Native American artists in SD travel new paths to prosperity

Native American artists  in SD travel new paths  to prosperity
image

#inform-video-player-1 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

#inform-video-player-2 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

WHITECLAY, Neb. — Within concrete walls that once housed a beer store that fueled alcoholism and death among residents of the nearby Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, renowned Native American artist Evans Flammond Sr. deftly draws lines on a huge buffalo hide.

Sitting at a table in the building in this small village on the South Dakota border, Flammond uses a tool called a chisel brush to lay out straight borders on the hide. The animal skin would eventually contain a sweeping encampment scene with American Indians on horseback running along the bottom.

This page requires Javascript.

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

#inform-video-player-3 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

Even with nothing on: Intimate photoshoots take over bedrooms

Even with nothing on: Intimate photoshoots take over bedrooms
ByUrvee Modwel

Jul 01, 2023 02:52 PM IST

Would you pose for intimate portraits? For many, it’s self-expression, body positivity, a way to fight back against artificial perfection

Celebs make it look like fun. Mindy Kaling and Ranveer Singh, Martha Stewart and Jennifer Aniston have bared it all… could you?

Model Simi Dass photographed by Shivaji Sen. Erotic photography can be liberating, Sen says. (All photos courtesy Shivaji Storm Sen)
Model Simi Dass photographed by Shivaji Sen. Erotic photography can be liberating, Sen says. (All photos courtesy Shivaji Storm Sen)

For most of us, a magazine cover isn’t really on the list of #goals. (Do you want vegetable oil smeared on your legs?). But artful nudes are another matter.

Boudoir photography can be empowering and exciting. At its heart, it is the opposite of the magazine shoot; its aim is to please just one viewer, you; and maybe one or more that you show the images to.

It’s about asking and answering the question: How comfortable are you, really, in your own skin? It’s an intimate exercise.

Choosing the right photographer is vital, and a growing number have built bodies of work, and reputations, in this niche. As with any deeply personal service — wedding planning, spa days, a bikini wax — discussions over what one is looking for, and comfortable with, shape the event.

Mumbai-based photographer Shivaji Sen (@shivajistormsen on Instagram) has one caveat: “I’m not a huge fan of the word ‘boudoir’. I think erotic photography is better,” he says. It’s a question of syntax, to him. “Boudoirs were essentially changing rooms for women, that men weren’t allowed to enter. So, the implication with ‘boudoir photography’ is that a person is seeing something they weren’t supposed to see.”

This isn’t a peepshow; he has a point. Take a look at other points he has to offer.

Boudoir photo shoots might seem daunting. But photographers assure you, it’s nothing they haven’t seen before. (Model Preet Rawat photographed by Sen.)
Boudoir photo shoots might seem daunting. But photographers assure you, it’s nothing they haven’t seen before. (Model Preet Rawat photographed by Sen.)

The process: “There’s a lot of conversation that happens before we meet and shoot,” says Sen. “The client talks about what they want to shoot; lays out the boundaries clearly.” Once it has all been arranged, the actual shoot can take four to six hours. Don’t schedule it for a lunch break, then.

The set-up: Find a photographer who will use some of that time to build a connection. “To makes things less uncomfortable, I break the ice by making tea for the person while we chat.” Spend a little time doing something mundane so you can connect, is Sen’s advice. Don’t overthink it. There’s nothing there the photographer hasn’t seen and shot before. If you want to do this, “don’t let it build in your head.” Don’t worry about what to do. “There’s not a lot of posing. It’s more about playing with light,” Sen says.

The subjects: Who is this for? “There are essentially two kinds of people who sign up for erotic photography,” Sen says. “Those who are very confident with their bodies and those who aren’t. Some of the latter sign up because they feel this will help them become more confident.” Most of his clients in this niche are women, Sen adds. He has shot with a few couples. “It was their anniversary gift to themselves.”

Vicky Kaushal in his bedroom, shot before the actor became a household name. (All photos courtesy Shivaji Storm Sen)
Vicky Kaushal in his bedroom, shot before the actor became a household name. (All photos courtesy Shivaji Storm Sen)

Overall, the numbers are rising. Sen says he had zero clients signing up for nude or erotic photography a decade ago, and about six or seven a year today.

The price: Sen charges between 60,000 and 1.5 lakh, depending on the number of frames requested, how elaborate one wants the location and set-up to be, and whether styling is required. Payment includes a guarantee of ownership for the client, and privacy protection. Certain terms can be insisted upon. For instance, “I’m the only one who works on erotic photographs for my clients, and the only one who sees them,” Sen says.

The verdict: So, should you do this? “People find it liberating, but they need to come to this on their own,” says Sen. “Nobody should be pushed into it. If they’re eager, if they want to try something, then this is for them.”

From HT Brunch, July 1, 2023

Follow us on twitter.com/HTBrunch

Connect with us on facebook.com/hindustantimesbrunch

Ron Haviv and the ‘power of photography’

Ron Haviv and the ‘power of photography’
By, Delhi

Jul 01, 2023 02:35 PM IST

Rwandan genocide to Russia’s Ukraine invasion, celebrated photojournalist Ron Haviv has long documented the horror of war. Today he works to expose AI threat.

In the time it takes to read this article, around 10 million photographs will be taken. Most will come from the smartphones of users who are compelled to constantly document their lives. By contrast, award-wining US photojournalist Ron Haviv has mostly taken photos to document conflict. He has photographed more than 25 wars, from the US-led invasion of Iraq to conflicts in Afghanistan, Panama, Haiti, and most recently, Ukraine

Pictures shared by Ron Haviv on their Instagram page. (Instagram/@Ron Haviv)
Pictures shared by Ron Haviv on their Instagram page. (Instagram/@Ron Haviv)

Born in 1965, he is co-founder of the photo agency VII and works with UNICEF, Doctors Without Borders and the International Red Cross, in addition to numerous publications.

While his thought-provoking images have become a way to raise awareness about the horrors of war and violence, this was not initially by design.

(Also Read | That’s no pizza: A wall painting found in Pompeii doesn’t depict Italy’s iconic dish)

“I wouldn’t say that I chose it,” he told DW at the Globadetl Media Forum in Bonn in June. “My first foreign assignment was in Central America covering elections in Panama that turned violent.”

Then everything changed.

“I took a photograph that became very famous. Seven months after I took the photograph, the United States invaded Panama. And the president of the United States spoke about the photograph as one of the justifications for the invasion,” he explained.

‘Raising awareness and education’

Haviv soon gained “an understanding at that moment that the photography that I could do, especially around conflict, could play a very serious role in conversation, in raising awareness and education.”

This sparked an interest in documenting historical events with his lens, including the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall or Nelson Mandela’s release from prison in 1990.

But it wasn’t long before Haviv was dragged back into conflict zones, including the never-ending war in Iraq.

It was a steep learning curve for Haviv, and not just in terms of photography techniques. He also had to discover that “it was imperative that there we’re people telling these stories to hold people accountable, not only for their action, but for their inaction,” he explained.

Photography ‘becomes evidence’

“In my career I have documented three genocides – Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur.”

Within some of the cruelest of human acts, taking photos becomes ever more important.

“The photography moves past this idea of just being journalism, it becomes evidence. Photography can’t stop a war. Photography can’t start a war, but it can play a very important role in the dissemination of information and the way that decisions are made.”

In 2015, Turkish journalist Nilufer Demir took an image that was to prompt responses from European leaders regarding a “human catastrophe.” The image of Alan Kurdi, the two-year old Syrian refugee who drowned in the Mediterranean Sea en route to Europe, lying face down in the sand, led many to ask the question of where the moral line should be drawn when photographers take such images.

‘The power of photography’

Haviv is in little doubt just how important these photos are. “I believe in the power of photography,” he said.

“I’m of the belief that the greater good overrides, that the story is important enough to be seen. Even if somebody’s crying or suffering, the photograph needs to be taken to show the world what’s happening.”

But what about the sensitivities, the intrusion? Haviv is unequivocal. “Having done this for more than 30 years,” he said, “I have never gone to a funeral of somebody that’s died through politics, war, famine, and been told, ‘No, don’t take any photographs.'”

People have instead demanded that he document the plight of their loved ones. “I have been physically dragged by a family member and said, ‘Photograph my son, photograph my child, show the world.'”

Fending off the threat of AI

But is the whole photography craft under threat from transformational technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI)?

“What you should be expecting from people like myself is authorship of an idea,” he said in response to the threat of AI. “This is a story that I’m telling in depth, especially now. There is integrity, that this is not an AI production: This is reality.”

He continued: “I’m showing you a true representation of the way that I saw things. And you have to trust me because I am a valued person or I’m doing it with The Economist and you trust The Economist and therefore you believe what you’re seeing.”

With AI able to easily manipulate images, “we are moving more and more into this place where it will be very difficult to believe what you’re seeing,” Haviv said.

But there is a chance that such dystopian misrepresentations can be avoided.

“There is no place for AI in my world,” the photographer continued. “The goal is to keep AI out and it has to be done in partnership with the publications, in partnership with the camera companies, and most importantly, in partnership with the audience.”

He describes a new initiative led by Adobe called Content Authenticity Initiative, whereby photo files will be given a blue check to confirm they have not been manipulated.

Haviv has been in the photojournalism business for over three decades. Though many things have remained the same, technology now threatens the authenticity of the craft, meaning the way we see the world needs to be questioned more than ever.

Paper Magazine, the Oral History: ‘They Were Wide Open’

Paper Magazine, the Oral History: ‘They Were Wide Open’

Paper Magazine made its debut in June 1984. The first issue was a foldout poster with a look as minimalist as the publication’s name, matching the raw aesthetic that reigned over Lower Manhattan in those days.

With its mix of bubbly enthusiasm and Gen-X skepticism, Paper became the scrappy kid sibling to the argumentative Village Voice and the lustrous Interview. Its readers were beautiful people and misfits, insiders and outsiders. Cover subjects included Sandra Bernhard, Naomi Campbell, Deee-lite, Kim Gordon, Cyndi Lauper, Queen Latifah, Chloë Sevigny, Venus Williams and Kim Kardashian.

The brains behind the operation were Kim Hastreiter and David Hershkovits, who had met while working at The SoHo Weekly News, an alternative paper that folded in 1982. On their watch Paper tracked all that was young, queer and cool in the culture until 2017, when it was acquired by EntTech Media Group.

In April, EntTech laid off the staff and sought a buyer. A few weeks ago, the media entrepreneur Brian Calle, who had resurrected The Village Voice and LA Weekly, said in an interview for this article that he had struck a deal to bring Paper back. In this oral history, the main players describe the highs and lows of a mostly glorious 40-year run.

David Hershkovits, left, and Kim Hastreiter, both wearing glasses, pose before a wall covered in Paper Magazine covers.
The founders of Paper, David Hershkovits, left, and Kim Hastreiter in 1988.Rita Barros/Getty Images

Cyndi Lauper, musician: It was a very creative, inventive time. And there were no rules. You made it up as you went along. You invented yourself. That was such a great part of the ‘80s. It was so inspiring.

Kim Hastreiter, co-founder: SoHo was bubbling. We were right in the middle of it, and David wanted to start a weekly. We tried to raise money for two years, but everyone rejected us. So we ended up just having to do it ourselves.

David Hershkovits, co-founder: We were trying to figure out how we were going to start this thing. I received a poster in the mail for a Kenny Scharf art opening. I was lying in bed and I unfolded it and went, “This could be something that we can make into a magazine. Do it as a poster.” It was visually stunning and different.

Carlo McCormick, writer, editor, 1984-2017: It started off a misshapen and unwieldy oddity in print. It celebrated a time of amateurism that’s probably been lost in New York.

Kim Hastreiter: I sold ads to Danceteria, Patricia Field, the Fun Gallery, the Pyramid. The ads were like $250 each. I would personally have to get the ad and collect the money.

Vincent Tullo for The New York Times
Vincent Tullo for The New York Times

In the early years, Paper was a D.I.Y. operation run mostly out of Ms. Hastreiter’s loft on Lispenard Street in TriBeCa. Richard Weigand, who was then a freelance designer at The New York Times, and Lucy Sisman, a designer and journalist who also worked at The Times, helped give the publication its distinctive look.

David Hershkovits: It was super hard because we didn’t have the equipment. We would go to The Times and produce a lot of the magazine secretly.

Richard Weigand, art director, The New York Times: I said, “Well, since we’re in the building, you might as well come and do it here.” I was stuck there all day anyway.

Todd Eberle, photographer: It was just X-acto blades and this thing called a waxing machine. They would have column lines drawn out, and you would literally paste a piece of text onto that column. And then there would be a freak out, because they noticed a comma was missing. I remember searching around on the floor, trying to find a waxy comma.

Kim Hastreiter: You didn’t sleep. We were so exhausted. Onetime David had the matte knife and he said, “Has anybody seen a reverse apostrophe?”

They were key to Paper’s editorial identity: From left to right, Mickey Boardman, who rose from intern to editorial director; Richard Pandiscio, who helped create its look, with the photographer Todd Eberle; and the writer and editor Carlo McCormick.Barbara Alper for The New York Times; Patrick McMullan, via Getty Images; Lindsay Brice/Getty Images

Richard Pandiscio, then the art director of Condé Nast’s House & Garden, came aboard as the lead designer, working on Paper in his off hours. Soon, ad revenue allowed it to morph from a broadsheet into a perfect-bound magazine.

Kim Hastreiter: My parents lived on 12th Street, near Fairchild Publications. My father called me, hysterical: “They’re throwing away all the desks! I have them for you!” He had all these giant steel desks from the 1940s that weighed a million pounds. But we had to take them because they were free. And that put me over the edge because I had 10 gigantic desks in my house. So we got an office.

Debi Mazar, actress: Kim was on the pulse of everything. I was doing a lot of photo shoots for her, and we just became girlfriends — not lovers, but girlfriends. I was 16 and I was working at the Mudd Club. Kenny Scharf, Keith Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat were my friends. No one was famous yet.

Anna Sui, fashion designer: Kim had this column about things she was obsessed with. It made your month, if you were on that list, because everybody was reading Paper.

Kenny Scharf, artist: Of course, we were aware of Paper. Basically, it was the East Village Eye and Paper, and then some magazines in Japan like Brutus, that were writing about us.

Cyndi Lauper: It wasn’t like other magazines. It really documented the downtown scene.

The Mudd Club, 1979. The actress Debi Mazar worked there while helping out with Paper photo shoots.Allan Tannenbaum/Getty Images

Sally Singer, head of fashion direction, Amazon: I was a teenager in California and I would seek it out on specialized newsstands. It was a dispatch from a cool world that I didn’t live in.

John Waters, filmmaker: I had a subscription from the day I saw it.

Todd Eberle, photographer: There was downtown and there was uptown. One never went uptown — maybe to the Met. And Paper was the first to kind of start mixing that up. It was a really interesting creative friction that caused sparks.

In 1989, to celebrate its fifth anniversary, the B-52’s posed for the cover. Still, it was more succès d’estime than moneymaker.

Kim Hastreiter: I worked for no salary for, like, eight years. I had to have other jobs.

Maggie McCormick: Sometimes bill collectors would come. We had to hide Kim under the blankets on her bed.

Debi Mazar: I did hair and makeup, and I was good at it. I did a lot of work for Paper. I don’t think I got paid.

Todd Eberle: They didn’t pay photographers. It was all for the glory of being published, which was a big deal then.

Richard Pandiscio, art director, 1985-1990: They gave me a lot of I.O.U.’s, which was cute.

via Kim Hastreiter
via Kim Hastreiter

While keeping an eye out for whatever was new in the culture, Paper included politics in the mix, mainly because the AIDS epidemic was ravaging the world the magazine covered. Joe Dolce covered the AIDS crisis; the graffiti artist Futura wrote about video games; and George Wayne documented nightlife.

David Hershkovits: Reagan wouldn’t even say the word AIDS in 1984. And while this whole uproar was going on, Tina Brown put Ronald Reagan and Nancy Reagan on the cover of Vanity Fair, dancing, as if there was nothing wrong. We took a stand. It wasn’t that popular in those days.

Bethann Hardison, activist, former model: They didn’t try to be diverse, because they naturally were.

Maggie McCormick, office manager, 1985-1993: There were just so many moments at Paper when you knew the world was being changed. I saw one of LL Cool J’s first performances.

Fenton Bailey, producer, former Paper columnist: The vibe was, “Hip-hop is a fad. It’ll come and go.” And that was not the attitude of Paper.

Dennis Dermody, film critic, 1986-2017: I got a call from David Hershkovits. He said, “Listen, we need a film critic, and I hear you go to the movies all the time. We don’t pay.” And I said, “Well, that sweetens the pot.” But who else would let me put out an article called “How to Cook and Eat Macaulay Culkin”?

Christine Muhlke, managing editor, 1994-2000: I got to ask bell hooks if she’d write a column for us. I said, “I can only pay you $100 a month but I promise I won’t change a word.” She said, “Sweetie, that is the nicest, sweetest thing I’ve ever heard in my life. Yes!”

Eileen Myles, poet, activist: I had just run for president, so I had this excessive idea of who I was, and I didn’t know where to go next, and those guys offered me this opportunity to be in their web. I wrote whatever the hell I was thinking about — millennial cults, labor movements, being queer living in the country. They were wide open.

Dennis Dermody: We were doing an April Fool’s issue in 1995, the year Disney was putting out “Pocahontas.” So I wrote this jokey article about how I saw a screening of it and it was depraved, filthy, and was going to get an NC-17 rating. La Stampa, in Rome, put up a big article: “Scandal Rocks Disney!” Disney held a press conference to say it was just a joke. David called me and said, “You’ve got to get down here, because your article is an international incident.” I couldn’t stop laughing.

From left, Eileen Myles, Futura and bell hooks.Bob Berg/Getty Images; Patti Morris; Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Paper’s interns included people who went on to success in their fields — the costume designer Sophie de Rakoff, the musician Jake Shears and the New York Magazine deputy editor Alexis Swerdloff.

Kim Hastreiter: If you found someone smart, you dumped everything on them. “Want to write a cover story?” And they’d be in high school.

Susanna Howe, assistant, editor, photographer, 1994-1996: Paper was like magazine grad school, because you were allowed to do so much that you would never be allowed to do at a bigger magazine. When I finally left, to go to Condé Nast, I quickly learned what big-boy magazine culture was: Being treated really badly. They wanted me to pick up their dry cleaning.

Mickey Boardman, intern, office manager, editorial director, 1992-2017: I applied to be an intern in March of 1992. I basically got kicked out of school. I didn’t really like Parsons and they didn’t really care for me, either. But Paper loved me and they loved my crazy outfits. I was a crystal meth addict at the time. I would wear Lilly Pulitzer pants with a lady’s polyester blouse and a chandelier necklace.

Christine Muhlke: Mickey was interviewing this woman for the receptionist job, and a mouse got caught in a trap, and he was killing it with his bare hands while he was interviewing her.

Susanna Howe: I remember that so well. He thought it was OK to take two sticky traps and sandwich the mouse between them and then throw that into the garbage. And you could still hear it squeaking. And he just went back to his desk.

Vikki Tobak, intern, columnist, 1992-1997: Carlo McCormick, one of our editors, had just gotten arrested and put in a Mexican prison. It was like, “We’re not working today. We’re just focused on getting Carlo out of prison.” That was my first week.

Carlo McCormick: I was indeed incarcerated in Mexico, sentenced to 25 years federal time for trafficking in peyote, which, of course, I was not. I was there doing a story on the art of a tribe that used peyote for their sacred visions.

Angie Estrada wears a Paper dress designed by her brother, Angel Estrada, at Susanne Bartsch’s Inaugural “Love Ball” to Benefit the Design Industry Foundation For AIDS.Fairchild Archive/Penske Media, via Getty Images

To raise funds for Mr. McCormick’s legal defense, Paper put on a show at Irving Plaza. Karen Finley, Richard Hell, the Psychedelic Furs and Deee-lite were on the bill. (Mr. McCormick was later exonerated in a Mexican court.) As the ‘90s moved along, Paper started featuring mainstream celebrities on its covers. When the magazine wasn’t covering parties, it was hosting them.

David Hershkovits: The ’90s were the most lucrative time for us. There were lots of ads. New York was exploding.

Vikki Tobak: Paper had a lot of power. Walking up to a door, I’d just say, “I’m Vicki from Paper,” and the seas would part.

Hunter Hill, publisher, 1993-2013: We didn’t have Condé Nast expense accounts. What we did have was a lot of cool people. Certain companies understood that and embraced it: Calvin Klein, Levi’s, Adidas.

Pedro Almodóvar, filmmaker: Kim has the best nose to smell emerging talent. When I released “All About My Mother,” she introduced me to two adorable beings, Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal. They were very trendy in the city.

Anna Sui: Somebody would call and say, “Oh, Paper’s having this party on the Manhattan Bridge.” There were hundreds of people, and I remember how exciting it was, just seeing the subway cars go by. It lasted 20 minutes before the police came. You felt like it was something special and renegade.

Paper over the years.Vincent Tullo for The New York Times

The media industry fell on hard times in the 21st century, destabilized by the internet. Like other publications Paper looked beyond its core business. It sponsored a concert series, Sounds of Paper. There were also Paper pop-up shops, an art store at Art Basel Miami and brand partnerships.

Alexis Swerdloff, intern, associate editor, executive editor, 2005-2012: It became a little more professionalized at some point. If you had a musician who had an album coming out, it was useful to have their first piece in Paper. I kept a Lady Gaga album on my desk with a Post-it note from a colleague, saying, “You should go check her out.” And I was like, “Pass.” Oops.

Carlo McCormick: The big blow was 9/11. Advertising budgets just dried up.

Kim Hastreiter: The designer Stephen Sprouse called me and said, “Target asked me to do something.” I was like, “What?” This is like in 2002. No one was doing collaborations. I called up all these talented people and said, “Can you design something for under $15 for Target?” Manolo Blahnik did a shoehorn, Isaac Mizrahi designed a mothball that’s a cube, so it didn’t roll, and I ran it at 30 pages with the title “Hey, Target: How About This?” I got a call from Target’s chief marketing officer, Michael Francis. He said, “This is the best thing.” He took me to the Odeon and hired me. I said, “You have to pay Paper.” So I worked for Target until the day I left.

Michael Francis, former chief marketing officer, Target: Kim helped us identify the right partners to engage. Frankly, we were borrowing the equity that they created with Paper. It was cutting-edge.

Carlo McCormick: I used to look down on other publications: “These magazines are way too much about marketing!” Well, Paper eventually became that, as well. It was a little sad and a little embarrassing to me, but I wasn’t the one trying to keep the lights on. So, no judgment.

Paper’s Winter 2014 cover was an online sensation.Vincent Tullo for The New York Times

Paper created its own marketing agency, Extra Extra. And it adapted to the internet, scoring an online hit in 2014 with a Jean-Paul Goude photo shoot featuring Kim Kardashian. In one picture, she is seen balancing a Champagne glass on her derrière. At a time when Paper’s print circulation stood at 155,000, the feature racked up 16 million web views in two days. It also got the attention of the media executive Tom Florio, who had served as the publisher of Vogue during his two-decade tenure at Condé Nast.

John Cafarelli, chief operating officer, 2012-2018: The magazine was still a beachhead of the brand. But in terms of how we made money? We sold access and ideas to some of the biggest companies in the world: Target, American Express, Tiffany & Company.

David Hershkovits: It became a different business because of the internet. And I felt outside the content of the magazine as time went on. I saw the writing on the wall.

Tom Florio, chief executive officer, EntTech: The Kim Kardashian cover shoot cost $10,000. And it took 30 million people to Papermag.com. An Annie Leibovitz shoot at Vogue cost significantly more and only drove 750,000 views to their website.

EntTech bought Paper in 2017. As its identity continued to evolve, the coronavirus pandemic cut into its events business. In June, about a month after EntTech laid off the staff, Paper was sold to Mr. Calle.

Brian Calle: I’m passionate about figuring out ways to create a new model for these legacy institutions, but then also preserve the work itself. I think Paper is perfectly positioned to be the go-to avant-garde agency.

David Hershkovits: Good luck to them. It’s not why we started it. We got our agency thing going so we could put out the magazine. The magazine was always primary.

Kim Hastreiter: I had my knee replaced. The doctor asked me a million health questions. And then, his last thing, he says: “I just want to say thank you. Paper saved my life. I was a young gay, growing up in Indiana, and I found Paper and it made me realize I wasn’t alone.”

‘It looked like an alien landscape’: Sheldon Serkin’s best phone picture

‘It looked like an alien landscape’: Sheldon Serkin’s best phone picture
image

It happens to be his daughter Tess’s 16th birthday on the day I speak with Sheldon Serkin about this photograph, which he took when Tess (on right) was just six. Sheldon and his wife, Tali, had taken Tess and her older brother, Elliot, to visit an exhibition at New York’s Bronx zoo when they came upon the prairie dog enclosure.

“I wanted to take a photo of these bubbles in the ground, which visitors can climb up into as though they are in with the animals,” Serkin says. “It looked like an alien landscape to me. I framed the shot without the surrounding spectators, and as one of the prairie dogs took centre stage, children popped up in all three bubbles. It was brilliant timing and made an even better photo than I had anticipated.”

Back in 2013, Serkin was using an iPhone 5, and the app Hipstamatic for his edits. “I still use it once in a while,” he says. “It has some good filters.”

skip past newsletter promotion

Serkin has been shooting strictly with iPhones since he began street photography in 2010, and cites their intuitive nature as the main reason he has never felt the need to explore competitor brands. As for how he feels about this photograph after all this time, he says that, despite being the harshest critic of his own work, he still likes it a lot.

“I’m always trying to anticipate what will happen next when I’m shooting, but sometimes things come together in just the right way at just the right time.”

The Trojan horse of Native theater

The Trojan horse of Native theater

Larissa FastHorse stood stage right and waited for her cue. Behind her, the set of The Thanksgiving Play: three white walls plastered with inspirational posters, some long brown tables and the fluorescent lights that clearly compose the average classroom — smeared and dripping with the faux blood of Native people. Before her, an audience thundering in a standing ovation. FastHorse’s name was announced, along with the title that will forever be hers: The first-known Native woman to have a play produced on Broadway.

 

This was a premiere-night crowd at the Hayes Theater: a carefully curated group of industry professionals — FastHorse’s peers — all sharply dressed and primed to celebrate. And FastHorse, by virtue of being on stage, her play having completed the first performance in a two-month Broadway run, was primed for their approval. After a moment, smiling, FastHorse raised the microphone and read a message in Lakota from her cellphone. Halfway through, she paused to wipe tears from her eyes. “Sorry,” she said in English to the crowd. “My father just passed recently, and I didn’t expect to cry saying his name. He’d be so proud of me being here.”

Clapping, whistles, shouts. The moment was buoyant; joy seemed to bounce off the theater’s walls. There was history made, and, yes, a bit of compromise to make it.


fasthorse-feature-5-jpg

Courtesy of Second Stage Theater

IN THE FALL OF 2022, FastHorse gathered the theater staff who would be producing The Thanksgiving Play. This is something she does with every theater company she works with, including Second Stage Theater, which has focused on productions by emerging and established American playwrights since it purchased the Hayes in 2015. The group included the designers, front-of-house officials, managers, in-house production management company — everyone involved in the logistics of producing the play, except for the actors, who had not yet been cast. The day was dedicated to what FastHorse likes to call “Indian 101.”

“We spent a couple hours together doing really basic cultural competency training,” FastHorse said. The goal, she explained, was for her and the staff to locate themselves “in our journey of our knowledge of Indigenous peoples and Indigenous audiences and topics.”

The Thanksgiving Play follows four non-Native amateur theater hopefuls tasked with putting on a politically correct Thanksgiving performance for an elementary school audience. Producing this finely tuned satire — particularly within the commercial New York scene, which is short on Indigenous representation — demanded a nuanced understanding of Native issues that FastHorse knew she would have to establish.

Despite having some 15 plays under her belt, FastHorse still finds herself the first Native voice in many of the spaces she occupies. Indian 101 is designed to build community and set a standard that protects rising Indigenous artists and their communities from industry ignorance.

 



Larissa FastHorse poses for a portrait at Placerville Camp located in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

 

The time and thought she puts into these gatherings is, as she put it, “extra free labor,” delicately balanced atop the long list of a playwright’s duties to ensure that her material retains its heart and foundational intentions. In addition to advising on production and set and prop design, FastHorse worked daily through rehearsals and the run of preview shows to tweak, tighten and update the play’s dialogue. But the Indian 101 sessions reflect a piece of advice she received from an early mentor, the late, acclaimed Maori filmmaker Merata Mita. “‘Larissa, you can be an educator or you can be an artist; you cannot be both,’” FastHorse recounted. By keeping her education work behind the scenes, FastHorse frees herself on the page. Or at least that’s the idea.

“‘Larissa, you can be an educator or you can be an artist; you cannot be both.’” 

Written over the course of a 10-day residency in Ireland in 2015, The Thanksgiving Play is in many ways a rebuke of the forces that necessitate Indian 101. The show, which runs at a tight one hour and 40 minutes, lacks an intermission. Instead, a screen drops down to show four videos, written by FastHorse and directed by Rachel Chavkin, that serve as interstitials — intervening segments that depict real (and really racist) Thanksgiving lesson plans, a truly committed-to-the-bit take on “Twelve Days of Christmas,” and a rendition of “My Country ‘tis of Thee” that includes a teenage Native band member flipping the bird to Teddy Roosevelt. FastHorse’s dialogue satirizes and skewers white, liberal, do-gooder norms, constantly revealing and recontextualizing the four characters’ varying degrees of ignorance of Native experience and history, until its bloody, blindingly white finale lays bare the hopelessness of ever accomplishing a Native-less production.

Like Indian 101, The Thanksgiving Play began as a response to a common problem. FastHorse, who is 52 years old, spent more than a decade writing and working on plays that mostly focused on and cast Native people. Her work was well-reviewed at theaters, including the Kansas City Rep and AlterTheater, but her attempts to convince production companies that any of it was ripe for a wider audience — let alone a Broadway audience — always hit the same wall. Native art performed by Native artists appeared, to non-Native financiers, too risky a gambit. And so, The Thanksgiving Play was born.

“If people are saying they can’t cast Native actors — which we all know isn’t true — then here, I’m going to deal with Indigenous issues in a way that is very presentable for white-presenting actors,” FastHorse told me during a break in rehearsals this April. She sat in a velvet-covered seat in the auditorium, stagehands and theater staff buzzing around her, maintaining the frenetic rehearsal pace even during breaks. “I didn’t want to do this,” she said of the play. “I tried not to for 12 years.”

But FastHorse saw this script as her best opportunity to enter the commercial circuit. It premiered at Portland’s Artists Repertory Theatre in 2017 and was immediately a hit; “Satire doesn’t get much richer than that,” a New York Times critic proclaimed in 2018. The following year, with a total of eight productions, The Thanksgiving Play was one of the nation’s most-produced plays.



Cast members of Wicoun gather with Larissa FastHorse at the chapel at Placerville Camp in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

All the while, the cultural landscape of television and literature — and theater, too — was shifting, ever so slightly. Cheyenne and Arapaho author Tommy Orange’s debut novel, There There, and Seabird Island Band author Terese Marie Mailhot’s Heart Berries exploded onto bestseller and award lists in 2018. A flood of Indigenous writers followed; series like Rutherford Falls and Reservation Dogs broke longstanding barriers for Native television writers and actors; hell, Maori actor and filmmaker Taika Waititi did a damn land acknowledgment at the Oscars. The change has been slow, but the seven-year period between the first Berkeley reading of The Thanksgiving Play and the Deadline announcement for its Broadway premiere marked a significant change in how Native artists were allowed to write and depict themselves and their communities. Native bodies and voices no longer needed to reflect the industry-standard racist, stereotypical caricatures of the past; they could be themselves, proudly.

In mid-February, the Broadway cast for The Thanksgiving Play was unveiled, with D’Arcy Carden, Chris Sullivan, Katie Finneran and Scott Foley hired to play the leads. Finneran, a Tony-winner, was the Broadway stalwart, while Foley and Sullivan were known for film and TV, too. Carden, one of the stars of The Good Place, was making her Broadway debut.

All four actors are white, though Carden’s father is Turkish. Performing this play, particularly its Broadway premiere, with non-Native leads meant everyone had to be in on the jokes, and that everyone needed to be clear about their relationship to FastHorse’s material. (FastHorse’s usual casting notes reads, “POC who can be considered white should be considered for all characters,” however labor regulations prevented the casting agency from including that language in their casting call.)

At Chavkin’s direction and with the advice of FastHorse and associate director Jeanette Harrison, who is of Onondaga descent, the cast and creative team started the first day of rehearsal by gathering in a large circle onstage. The group smudged to begin the session. They looked each other in the face, acknowledging their existence as artists and human beings, the majority white and non-Native. “We had a lot of feelings expressed (by the) people who were digging into these things,” FastHorse said of the actors and their understudies. “It’s hard to play what’s, essentially, the ‘good’ bad guy. So we spent a lot of time (establishing) that it was always a safe space to discuss things.” She worked closely with Chavkin and Harrison to develop an approach to directing and feedback delivery that would empower both cast and crew to ask questions throughout rehearsals.

“(It’s) part of the things that, honestly, I have to do as a Native American playwright who’s almost always the first one in a space,” FastHorse said with a shrug. She let a sigh of hope drift up into the rafters.

“Honestly, I can’t wait for the day when I can just be a playwright.”

THE BURDEN OF BEING FIRST means constantly recognizing how those before you were held back. It’s acknowledging the deep-rooted colorism that dark-skinned Native artists recognize as a closed door, and white-presenting Natives recognize as a slim crack to slither through. It’s also a reminder of exactly what Native artists are allowed to say once they reach the upper echelon of any given artistic industry, particularly those that require a team of non-Native financiers to hold final say over which projects get the green light.

FastHorse’s talent as a playwright means she is able to enter ultra-exclusive rooms within already exclusive spaces that have, for the entirety of their colonial, capitalistic existence, been meticulously designed to present, on rare occasions, a specific kind of Native: someone who can speak firmly, but not too loudly; who is tan, but not too dark; “tradish,” but still, like, down with brunch on Sundays. FastHorse has seen the slivers of light and used her talent to slip through doors that she, by any reasonable measure of her skill, should have been able to kick — if not burn — down. It’s a frustrating and unfair position to put any Native artist in. But the burden of being first comes with blessings, too. It allows you, in those pockets of ovation-backed joy, to reflect on the people that lifted you up, past the limitations put on those who came before and onto those big-city stages.

“People would forget and say things around me that they would never say if they knew I was Native.”

FastHorse was 11 months old when she was adopted by a white couple, Edmund “Ed” and Rhoda Baer in Winner, South Dakota. Her birth father, a citizen of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, and her non-Native birth mother had separated, and the Baers became her Hunka — her chosen — family. When Ed took a job a hundred miles away in Pierre, Rhoda and FastHorse moved with him. Although she grew up away from her FastHorse family, she had mentors and teachers who were a regular part of her life, and she grew up proudly Lakota. And she learned the passing game. In Pierre, FastHorse learned how white people spoke about Native communities when they perceived themselves to be alone. “People would forget and say things around me that they would never say if they knew I was Native,” FastHorse said. “Then it’d be the panic, and they’d be like, ‘Oh, shit, you know — well, not you.’”

Despite her connection to both her Lakota and adopted families, FastHorse, an only child, felt a sense of isolation that she channeled into writing. She enjoyed crafting conversations between real or imagined characters. “I was writing scenes already,” she said. “I just didn’t know that’s what they were.”



Larissa FastHorse, who for 10 years was a professional ballet dancer, begins her morning with a workout at Placerville Camp.

FastHorse worked as a professional ballet dancer for a decade, performing Balanchine for companies in Atlanta and Los Angeles. After her dance career ended, she worked her way into a paid internship at Universal Pictures, citing experience at a nonexistent Santa Monica film school she made up. But what began as a stab at television writing quickly shifted to the stage. “This was 15 years ago in Hollywood,” she reminded me. “The representation of Indigenous peoples was constantly being watered down; the casting was: Anyone brown was fine.”

In theater, she discovered the sense of agency that Hollywood had denied her. Unlike screenplays, the plays she wrote were not the proprietary assets of film studios; instead, hers, and hers alone, to license as she saw fit. She was able to hire language consultants and commission Native artists like Bobby Wilson (Sisseton-Wahpeton Dakota) to produce lobby artwork that would set the tone for audiences as they entered the theater. She was able to contribute to, and eventually create, Native-driven and -staffed productions, designed for audiences of all backgrounds. “Coming from the ballet world,” FastHorse said, “I was like, ‘This is dancers with furniture, I can do this. I get it.’”

FastHorse’s scripts often reflect an ongoing exploration of the dynamics within intergenerational households and the many ways in which community can be defined, and she’s taken care to build these values into their subsequent creation and performance. As FastHorse began to rack up some of the world’s most prestigious fellowships and residencies and appear on annual best-of lists, she developed a partnership with Cornerstone Theater Company and director Michael John Garcés, for what would become a trilogy of plays entirely developed, written and produced with local Native communities. The first production, Urban Rez, was set and staged in Los Angeles and tackled the issue of federal recognition, while the second, Native Nation, was hosted by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community and developed in partnership with tribal communities in and around Phoenix. The third, Wicoun, was set closer to home, with performances in Rapid City and other locations in South Dakota, in late May through mid-June — several weeks after her Broadway premiere.

FastHorse has built a career by acknowledging and exploring the universal experience of awkwardness that can exist between siblings and elders and partners. At the same time, she addressed larger existential questions of belonging, of found-and-curated communities and the lasting emotional impact of paternalism, whether by a loved one or a federal government.

One of her boldest plays, What Would Crazy Horse Do?, occupies the narrow space between black comedy and harrowing drama. The script tells the story of twins Journey and Calvin, who, as the last two surviving members of the fictional Marahotah Tribe, are approached by the Ku Klux Klan with a peculiar offer. The Klan sees the demise of the Marahotah as a perfect symbol: A tribe on the brink of extinction because of the ignoble effects of race-mixing and integration. The precise deployment of humor in the play is required for its high-wire act to pay off. (The twins constantly remind one another of their moribund “womb to tomb,” suicide pact.) But it is unabashedly a Native production. Early in the play, scoffing at the possibility of other Marahotah descendants, Journey cracks, “The only ones that may be left are so mixed they wouldn’t even call themselves Cherokee.”

As I pored over Calvin’s concluding monologue and the play built up to his sister’s decision, in the final scene, to don regalia embroidered with the Klan flag, I found myself muttering, So, this is what it’s like when a Native writer feels unbound.

THE THANKSGIVING PLAY is not unbound.

It is still pretty funny. Sullivan, who plays history teacher and wannabe-playwright Caden, is honored when he’s named dramaturg, “the holy grail of American theater titles.” D’Arcy Carden’s character, Alicia, inquires, “What is that?” to which Caden replies, in a hushed, mysterious whisper: “No one knows.” And the pairing of Finneran and Foley, who depict a seemingly frictionless, granola-ass couple, nail both the physical comedy and the barbs — “and the sex is so … bizarre!” Finneran, as Logan, shouts, finally unleashing on her tantric-style boyfriend, to a wave of laughter.

 



FastHorse, center, and cast members gather at work in the chapel.

 

For the first hour, the show is funny in a way that feels familiar, now that sending up white liberals is already something of a cottage industry in the entertainment and comedy worlds. It crisply delivers on the satire of purported Indigenous allies, and the four leads nail every savory line. But the mechanism FastHorse employs to subvert the audience’s expectations is where compromise again rears its head.

Roughly halfway through the show, Jaxton and Caden exit to gather materials for a battle sequence commemorating the Pequot Massacre of 1637 — during the massacre, several dozen Mohegan and Narragansett citizens joined with the English to participate in the slaughter of Pequot families. The pair re-enter the classroom and perform their scene, in which, with full Highlander cosplay and fog machines, they empty a bag filled with blood-soaked, realistic Pequot mannequin heads onto the stage. The two men and Alicia then kick the heads around, toss them back and forth and roll them on the floor. Alicia smears bloody handprints on the back wall, while Jaxton and Caden complete their speeches and spread more blood about the stage, all to the horrified shock of Logan.

“You tell stories differently when it’s your nation, your blood memory. Everything is more weighted.”

This moment, as directed and depicted onstage, is both intensely disturbing and darkly, darkly absurd — both layered and abruptly straightforward. At the two performances I attended, the scene was met at first with groans and a handful of gasps, and then, eventually, a smattering of laughter.

For Chavkin and scenic designer Riccardo Hernández, this was more or less the desired effect. Using the touchstones of The Shining and Cabin in the Woods, they’d played around in early-stage rehearsals with dark-red lighting cues, and, at one point, they even tried what Chavkin described as “this creepy-ass tilt” with the classroom set’s ceiling. The idea was to create a tunnel effect, “almost sucking the audience and the actors in,” Hernández said. But ultimately, Chavkin — crediting a note from FastHorse — decided that pulling the focus away from the actors (and the Pequot heads) would have been distracting. Making the collective call to leave the soft white lighting and the level ceiling, staying in the confines of the classroom, was the kind of decision that “takes trust,” Hernández said. “Trust and instinct.”

It’s an effective scene — for the intended audience. Because, for a Broadway audience or a non-Native audience or even a non-Northeastern Native audience, the heads they see being kicked and rolled around aren’t Pequot heads. Instead, they’re symbolic, an amalgamation that doesn’t represent a specific trauma, but rather the broader consequences of the violence of European- and American-caused genocide — that, and the fact that the lingering impacts of this violent history have not been fully absorbed by today’s artists.

But, as the playwright Madeline Sayet reminded me, “You tell stories differently when it’s your nation, your blood memory. Everything is more weighted.”

Sayet is a citizen of the Mohegan Tribe, a clinical assistant professor at Arizona State University (where FastHorse also teaches), and the executive director of the Indigenous Performing Arts Program at Yale University. Sayet is also a playwright, director and performer, and she recently toured her one-person play, Where We Belong, in which she engages with the division created by colonization and the different expectations of war, including the generational harm caused by the Pequot Massacre.

New York, she told me, is not an easy place to be a Native person in theater. There is community and progress and beautiful art all happening on stage, but the city’s commercial scene feels sometimes stuck in a constant game of catch-up. It’s a conflicting space, both the pinnacle of the industry and a constant reminder of incrementalism, particularly for those from the region.



Larissa FastHorse watches Wicoun cast members during rehearsals at Placerville Camp.

Sayet thought back to Broadway’s long history of pillaging Northeastern Native stories, citing the 1829 premiere of John Augustus Stone’s Metamora; or, The Last of the Wampanoags, at Park Theater, which helped popularize redface in the New York theater scene and historicize the region’s Indigenous population. This thread connects to the slow pace the modern Broadway scene has assumed when it comes to providing true support for Native artists — that FastHorse bears the burden of this particular first in 20-damn-23 is as much a condemnation of the whole operation as it is a hint of what it could yet still be.

Set against the Broadway backdrop, a Lakota-written, white-cast and -directed play that hinges on the punting of Pequot heads is a tricky operation to pull off, particularly when the audience is unlikely to be mostly Native. And the more I teased out the questions that rushed through my head the two times I watched this scene — does this work? Who is this for? What does it mean to mix my silence with others’ laughter? — the more I felt myself coming back to a note Sayet gave me as she reflected on her own play.

“I kept being told it was going to ‘do’ something, and I think for some audiences, I think it did — ultimately, it was at least a Native person telling a Native story,” she said. “But I still wonder, ‘Why that story? Why’d they pick that one?’ Is it because they want to see Native people suffer? Like, ‘How did they get me alone?’ I feel like we ask all these questions because we know that they’re not willing to go all the way at once and so there’s this thing that’s immediately in our minds of like, ‘What have we given into?’”

There is still a perceived gap, real or not, between the amount of Indigenous honesty that the moneybag-holders in American theater believe an audience can handle, and more to the point, what they will shell out cash to be entertained by.

Tara Moses, a citizen of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and Mvskoke and a widely produced playwright and director, described this self-imposed sense of risk as stemming from the insecurity built into the commercial theater scene, in New York and beyond. “It’s not just about having us as marginalized people be showcased for the first time, like other marginalized identities,” Moses said. “It’s that our sheer existence is political, full stop.”

FastHorse is forthright about why she wrote The Thanksgiving Play, and she has no regrets, not about the heads or the play’s non-Native director. For her, the play represents both external limitation and possibility: A foot in the door that allows her to wave through the coming generations of Indigenous playwrights, actors and directors.

“Because I did (The Thanksgiving Play) and it’s on Broadway, now my next five plays this year all have Native characters. I couldn’t get that before,” she said. “This play means I’ve got five plays of Native actors that are going to be employed the rest of this year and for all of next year, and three more plays after that, that are already set up.”

This is the compromise that The Thanksgiving Play represents. For better and for worse, it is a Trojan horse of Native art. On the other side of the gate: Wicoun.

“It’s that our sheer existence is political, full stop.”

FASTHORSE STOOD on a different stage now, 1,700 miles away from the Hayes Theater. Once again, there were tears in her eyes.

She was in the Black Hills, creating  new stories in what, for her people, is the place of their origin. The play — titled Wicoun and performed in Lakota, Dakota and English by an all-Native cast balanced with local and out-of-town actors — focuses on a Lakota teen, Áya, and their brother, Kȟoškálaka, as the pair navigate their zombie-filled homelands after they summoned a superhero. (FastHorse’s team also put on a second play, for Lakota youth, titled Learning Wolakota.) There was still compromise involved: The rehearsals were held at Placerville Camp, a Christian retreat center, a series of cabins and communal spaces at a former gold-mining outpost that the Wicoun team rented to polish their production. One of the rehearsal spaces, for Learning Wolakota, was a chapel. A cross loomed in the sanctuary above the actors; through the windows behind it, you could see the Black Hills, and all the reminders of home and colonization that come with them.

For days, the Wicoun cast had been running lines, going through staging, running it again and again, FastHorse always quick to huddle with her actors and with Garcés, until each subtlety felt just right — not for a Broadway audience, or for the financiers, or for anyone but the Native communities the play had been created with and for.

But, during a quick break, the playwright’s tears welled. The nominees for the Tony Awards had just been announced, and The Thanksgiving Play was not among them.

On her phone, FastHorse read a New York Times article on the surprises and snubs of the awards that year. Speaking of her play, the critic said: “It is also a parable of Native American erasure, which makes the exclusion disconcerting.” She showed the article to Kumeyaay actor Kenny Ramos and let her tears fall. She took another breath and then another and picked her head up.

“From the top!”   

Nick Martin is a senior editor for HCN’s Indigenous Affairs desk and a member of the Sappony Tribe of North Carolina. We welcome reader letters. Email him at [email protected] or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

Hi there, reader.

We hope you found value in the article, above.

Before you go, I’d like to ask you for a few dollars of support.

For more than 50 years, High Country News has been funded by readers just like you: citizens of the world who are curious and passionate about the West.

I’m guessing you are the kind of person who stays abreast of news and takes time to keep informed about issues that matter to you. As such, I’m sure you’re well aware that journalism around the globe is in real trouble.

You can help our team of independent writers, editors, illustrators and photojournalists stay focused on the important stories with your tax-deductible donation today. Even $4 – or the cost of a small latte – makes a difference to us.

We hope you’ll return to this website again, and read as much as your tough or tender heart can consume. And you’ll feel better knowing you’ve invested in fair-minded, in-depth journalism.

We need you now, more than ever.

Onward, with courage and resolve!
Greg Hanscom
Executive Director/Publisher

Get our Indigenous Affairs newsletter ↓