‘All I wore was my camera strap’: David Hurn’s best photograph

‘All I wore was my camera strap’: David Hurn’s best photograph

Early in my career, I realised that having a well-numbered archive with clear captions was something that would bring in an income for ever. I realised, too, that it was a good idea to go out and photograph unique subjects: the biggest, the smallest, things that were about to disappear. When you’re the only person who has photographed something that has been and gone, that gives you an enormous advantage when people want images of it in the future.

So whenever I heard of something that fitted that category, I’d trot off and photograph it. If someone wanted to publish the photographs at the time, great. But at the back of my mind was always the thought: “This is really for the future.” And that was the case when I attended the Isle of Wight festivals, all three, in 1968, 69 and 70. I knew I’d get some pictures – but of course it was also great fun.

There were some big acts on stage over those three years – Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell, Jimi Hendrix – but I knew the other 200 photographers would have them covered, all ending up with basically the same pictures. I was always much more interested in the spectators, the fans. There was certainly no shortage of people to photograph. The second festival was much better attended than the first, and there were rumours before the 1970 one that it was going to be the biggest concert the world had ever seen. I’ve since read that there were as many as 700,000 people there.

At big events, the first thing I always look for is the shot that shows how many people are there. I tend to shoot that picture first, because it usually means hiking up some bloody hill and if I don’t do it straightaway I’ll forget. Then I’ll do the journalistic thing and analyse what’s important – how do people live, where do they sleep, do they have their children with them – and photograph those. At the Isle of Wight, I ended up concentrating on a main group of a few hundred people.

Opportunities to wash were few and after a while we all started to smell. The heavy body odour hanging over everyone became increasingly difficult to ignore. Realising we weren’t that far from the beach, a group of about 300 of us went down to the sea to get clean. To do that properly, of course, you have to take your clothes off, so that’s what everyone did. When I took this, the only thing I had on was my camera strap. It seemed perfectly natural, I’d have felt more embarrassed if I was the only person fully clothed. There are a few people wearing swimming costumes, and I sometimes wonder if they’ve seen this since and wished they’d been bolder.

Salt water is actually not much use for getting clean, but in the picture everyone had congregated at a point where a freshwater stream ran into the sea. I don’t think the V-signs are aimed at anything in particular – that’s just what people did then. It’s a fun picture, totally joyous. The whole thing lasted no more than 15 minutes, then we got dressed and went back to the festival. I don’t remember anyone else being on the beach when we arrived, but as we left we passed old ladies and police who seemed none the wiser.

Actually, the police were very relaxed throughout. I’ve heard reports of trouble at the 1970 event but I didn’t see any – and I usually have a pretty good nose for that sort of thing. I have a picture of a group of Hell’s Angels at one of the festivals: they looked a bit threatening but I’ve always found that if you go up and started talking to people, they are charming.

In a sense, I’ve been shooting the same picture since 1955. My aim is always to make as truthful a record as possible. I don’t pose people or alter anything and never retouch. Every morning I wake up and say: “Well, I’m still here. That’s a good start.” Then I look out of the window and think: “It’s a new world, it’s not the same world as yesterday.” That means I’ve got lots to photograph. And whoopee, off I go.

This is one of over 100 images available in the Square Print Sale, at magnumphotos.com, 16-22 October, in which Magnum Photos partners with the World Press Photo Foundation

David Hurn’s CV

Portrait of David HURN, photographer, shot by Sue PACKER, photographer. 2014.

Born: Redhill, Surrey, 1934
Trained: Self-taught
Influences: Rodin, Bruegel, Seurat, later Sergio Larraín, Bruce Davidson
High point: “The Lucie award for achievement in documentary photography”
Low point: “Missing pictures because of not having a camera with me”
Top tip: “Wear good shoes”

Disjointed and Mirrored Figures Break Into Indistinct Selves in Kat Kristof’s Portraits

Disjointed and Mirrored Figures Break Into Indistinct Selves in Kat Kristof’s Portraits

“She & Her” (2023), oil on canvas, 150 x 150 centimeters. All images courtesy of BEERS London, shared with permission

“Where is the outline of one’s self beyond the physical body?” asks the artist Kat Kristof. “If I stand close to you, am I part of you? If we touch, our beings intersect, where do I start and do you begin? Do we share a single being between us?”

In Her & the Self opening next week at BEERS London, Kristof expounds on what it means to try to define something as mutable, fluid, and fragmented as the self. She paints in neutrals and muted jewel tones, rendering figures that are disjointed, mirrored, entwined, and glitched. In works like “She & Her,” for example, a secondary figure appears to peel itself off the body of the subject, a motif similar to that in “Portrait of Them IV.” Other pieces, like “Portrait of Her IV,” show a single woman looking directly toward the viewer, while another identical form slyly peeks out from her left side with a knowing expression.

A statement about the exhibition poses the theory that each portrait equally depicts the sitter and the artist, further ensnaring several identities and perceptions into each of Kristof’s works. While composed of geometric blocks of subtle color, her stylized figures defy clear delineation, their forms often melding into one another and blurring any boundary between the two. The subjects also retain their anonymity and distance from the viewer, further questioning the limits of what we’re able to glean about each other and ourselves.

Her & the Self runs from October 20 to November 25. Glimpse Kristof’s studio and process on Instagram.

 

A mirrored portrait of a woman split in the center

“Portrait of Her I” (2023), oil on canvas, 135 x 145 centimeters

A portrait of a woman wearing blue with a second figure appearing to emerge from her left side

“Portrait of Her IV” (2023), oil on canvas, 100 x 100 centimeters

A portrait of a person with their back turned to the same figure. Fragments of that figure are also flipped and mirrored vertically

“Portrait of Them II” (2023), oil on canvas, 150 x 150 centimeters

Two figures with geometric faces, both touching heads

“Portrait of Them IV” (2023), oil on canvas, 145 x 110 centimeters

A portrait of two women wearing white, one leans her head on the others' shoulder

“Her & Her” (2023), oil on canvas, 185 x 125 centimeters

Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $5 per month. The article Disjointed and Mirrored Figures Break Into Indistinct Selves in Kat Kristof’s Portraits appeared first on Colossal.

Adobe: ‘Some Amount of Photography Will Move to Virtual Photography’

Adobe: ‘Some Amount of Photography Will Move to Virtual Photography’
Generative Match tool
Adobe’s new Generative Match tool powered by Firefly 2.

Adobe has announced Firefly 2, the next iteration of its generative AI tool which will deliver “higher-quality” images and include a new “Generative Match” feature which seemingly spells bad news for photographers.

Firefly 2 was unveiled yesterday at the 2023 Adobe Max conference with the artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tool incorporated into Lightroom’s new lens blur feature that simulates depth of field along with a host of other tools.

However, it was the new “Generative Match” tool that will allow users to upload a reference image to guide the AI image generator to a specific style that prompted Adobe to comment that the new tools could mean less work for photographers.

Adobe is appealing to companies who want a “consistent look across assets.” It is offering brands the chance to generate hundreds, if not thousands of similar images for different uses such as websites, social media, and print advertisements.

Generative Match tool example

The idea that brands can use Adobe’s tool to generate a large set of imagery could signal bad news for human creators, something Adobe’s chief technology officer for digital media, Ely Greenfield, appeared to confirm to Reuters.

“Up until a few months ago, it was still a very manual process to get all those photos — not only to take the photos but then to process them,” Greenfield says.

“Some amount of photography is going to move to virtual photography, where you’re generating from whole cloth. But a lot of it also is going to be, you do some amount of traditional photography or traditional creative work, and then you do a bunch of adaptation using this generative technology.”

Generative Match is still in beta mode which means users can’t use the output for commercial purposes yet. Any work generated by Generative Match will have a Content Credentials tag automatically attached to it which will mark it as being AI-generated.

Firefly 2 is currently available on Adobe’s web app and will be “coming soon” to its Creative Cloud apps.

Firefly 2’s New Features

At the Adobe Max conference, the company said that Firefly users have generated three billion images since the service was launched in March.

[embedded content]

The new Firefly 2 image model will power Adobe’s popular Generative Fill tool which will be better at rendering humans with improvements to “skin, hair, eyes, hands, and body structure” and the pictures will be higher resolution and feature more vivid colors and color contrast.

Firefly comparison
Firefly 1 versus Firefly 2.

Additionally, users of the Firefly web app will benefit from applying and adjusting photo settings, “similar to manual camera lens controls.”

The latest model also has an “improved understanding of text prompts and will recognize more landmarks and cultural symbols.”

Away from the world of “promptography”, there is a new Firefly vector model which creatives can use to generate “high-quality designs and illustrations.” As well as a Firefly design model which offers a “text to template” service.


Image credits: Adobe

Unleash Your Inner Bear With the “Born to be Wild” Public Artwork

Unleash Your Inner Bear With the “Born to be Wild” Public Artwork

NEON creates some of the best site-specific public artworks out there, and Born to Be Wild stays true to that statement. The permanent installation is centrally located within Keepmoat’s Cable Wharf development in Northfleet, UK, designed so that the public can interact by climbing, sitting on, and walking through it. But Born to Be Wild is more that what meets the eye, as it’s been installed above the buried remains of a bear pit that was a focal attraction of 19th century Victorian gardens.

overhead sketch of an outdoor art installation

Bear Pit Overlay

To preserve the historical structure from further weathering and erosion, English Heritage advised it be re-buried. In response, NEON used the lines of the archaeological drawings of the bear pit to define the sculpture when viewed from overhead. Gently undulating details evoke tree branches, which are of course a part of a bear’s natural environment. This particular way of interacting with Born to Be Wild is intended to be thought provoking – what’s the future relationship between animals and humans?

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

Mick O’Farrell, Regional Managing Director at Keepmoat, said: “It’s important to us that we celebrate the local history of our sites and their surrounding areas.” Added Mark Nixon of NEON, “We were keen that this project might allow the public to understand what lies beneath their feet while also providing an engaging, functional, and interactive experience. A key component of the project’s success was engagement with the local school children from Rosherville primary school who encouraged our team to make the sculpture even more wild!”

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

The group of Key Stage 2 students from Rosherville Church of England Primary Academy went through a series of online workshops during Covid that allowed them to explore the artwork and provide feedback. Their responses encouraged the NEON team to make the form much more curvaceous for a more exciting experience when used for play.

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation with children playing on it

“The art installation was originally commissioned to ensure the heritage at Cable Wharf was preserved and based on its popularity within the local community, we believe this has been achieved by the team NEON with the public artwork commemorating the historic bear pit within the Italian garden,” shared Adam Knight, Regional Managing Director at Keepmoat, South Midlands.

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation with children playing on it

The artwork was manufactured by Steeline in ten sections that were bolted together onsite. Born to Be Wild is constructed from 316 stainless steel and painted in a marine grade epoxy paint for durability. Special attention was paid to the foundations that were designed to be shallow so they wouldn’t impact the historic bear pit structure beneath. The artwork was engineered by Elliot Wood.

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation with children playing on it

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

large seafoam green abstract undulating outdoor interactive art installation

To learn more about Born to Be Wild, visit neon.uk.

Photography by Simon Anning.

Kelly Beall is Director of Branded Content at Design Milk. The Pittsburgh-based writer and designer has had a deep love of art and design for as long as she can remember, from Fashion Plates to MoMA and far beyond. When not searching out the visual arts, she’s likely sharing her favorite finds with others. Kelly can also be found tracking down new music, teaching herself to play the ukulele, or on the couch with her three pets – Bebe, Rainey, and Remy. Find her @designcrush on social.

Is Stock Photography Worth the Effort in 2023?

Is Stock Photography Worth the Effort in 2023?

It used to be that if you were good at it and could invest the time, you could make a decent living from stock photography, but in recent years, the industry has evolved in what has very much been a race to the bottom in many ways, and it is a far less reliable income source than it used to be. Is it still worth the time and effort in 2023? This great video essay features an experienced commercial photographer discussing his experience with stock work in the past year. 

Coming to you from Scott Choucino of Tin House Studio, this excellent video essay discusses his recent experiences trying to establish decent passive income from stock photography. It used to be that a talented stock photographer who dedicated time to producing a large library of images could be rewarded with significant passive income as those shots continued to sell over the years, but over time, the rise of microstock, free image sites, and now, AI-generated work, have all continued to eat away at was once a relatively secure genre, and it is now questionable if it is worth getting into. As Choucino details, it can be ok under very specific circumstances, but for the most part, you should think carefully. Check out the video above for the full rundown. 

On a roll: taking analogue photography to the streets

On a roll: taking analogue photography to the streets

For the past year, a shiny, silver Airstream trailer has been parked for a month at a time in different neighbourhoods across New York, distributing rolls of 35mm film for free and serving as a darkroom for resident photographers.

The mobile photo lab is an ongoing project by the Brooklyn-based art space Worthless Studios, with previous iterations travelling across the US. Free Film: NYC, as this edition is called, has so far made stops in Red Hook, the Lower East Side and the South Bronx, with the Airstream due to roll into Green-Wood Cemetery in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, this month and the Brotherhood of Sister Sol youth centre in Harlem in November.

At a time when the world is inundated with digital photography, and images generated using artificial intelligence are raising questions about authenticity and authorship, the Free Film project marks a return to a more physical form of the medium.

“Analogue has made a comeback,” says Neil Hamamoto, the founder and artistic director of Worthless Studios. There is a strong community of photographers who still shoot on film, he adds, and others who have held onto their manual cameras and remember the basics. “It’s something about the medium that just always sticks with people,” he says. “We’ve seen folks come in who just love the smell of the darkroom and love to sit down and share stories about their time learning photography.”

The project hands out between 100 and 150 rolls of film at each location and asks recipients to capture images based on a specific prompt. For the New York edition, the theme is One Square Mile, and neighbourhood boundaries are mapped out for participants, but they can otherwise interpret the theme as they wish.

At the end of the month, participants can return their film to the trailer and have it developed without charge, receiving free scans of their images from Worthless Studios. About 75% of the rolls are returned, Hamamoto says. “We try to vet people that we think will take the project seriously,” he adds, “and in certain instances, we are able to loan cameras to those that really want to participate.”

Worthless Studios partners with community organisations to host the Airstream, such as the Bronx Documentary Center and the Lower East Side Girls Club, and a resident photographer heads the project in each neighbourhood, leading classes and workshops, or taking groups on photo walks. Resident photographers get a $2,500 stipend as well as the materials they need to develop their own film and make prints. “Part of our mission is to provide resources to young career artists,” Hamamoto says, “handing over a set of keys for them to do what they want with the darkroom space.”

Sofie Vasquez, the resident photographer during the project’s stint in the South Bronx, says her focus was accessibility, opening the Airstream’s darkroom to photographers who never had the chance to create their own prints or experiment with techniques like cyanotype. “I like learning new things, especially with photography,” Vazquez says. “And I think just giving people access to knowledge and options, that’s how someone’s going to naturally figure out what they want to create.”

On Free Film’s opening day in the South Bronx, photographers of all experience levels stopped by the trailer, from a first-time manual camera user joining his friend who had recently taken up the medium, to emerging artists who had participated in other legs of the project.

A selection of 100 to 200 images drawn from the thousands submitted will be displayed in an exhibition at Worthless Studios’ space in East Williamsburg next year, where the project will end its tour. A book of photographs will also be published.

Despite the variety of people taking part in the project, some common themes are already emerging, Hamamoto says, such as portraits of passersby taken on the street. This shows the connections that photography can make. “Trying to take a photograph of someone sparks conversation,” he says, “and joy.”

From Chef to Lens: Jeff Couch’s Journey Into the World of Food Photography

From Chef to Lens: Jeff Couch’s Journey Into the World of Food Photography
OK LogoNEWS
man pp

Oct. 11 2023, Published 5:27 a.m. ET

Jeff Couch, a seasoned food photographer whose unique journey into the world of culinary artistry has led him to capture some of the most delectable and visually stunning dishes. From his initial career as a chef to his current role as a celebrated food photographer.

Article continues below advertisement

Jeff Couch’s journey into the realm of food photography began with a completely different career path – that of a chef. For several years, he honed his culinary skills, but as life evolved with marriage and family, he realized that the long hours in the kitchen were not aligned with the lifestyle he desired.

Seeking a change, Jeff transitioned to a role where he could combine his culinary expertise with design, working for a global manufacturer to create kitchen equipment from a chef’s perspective. His innovative designs even earned him a U.S. patent.

However, his creative spirit remained unsatisfied, and he soon found himself drawn to photography, particularly the captivating allure of ghost towns and urban decay. Armed with little photography knowledge, he embarked on a journey of self-discovery, ultimately leading him to pursue formal education in photography at UCLA. After completing a four-year program and a mentorship, he found his calling in food photography.

Food photography is a unique niche in the world of photography. Jeff emphasizes that the most critical element in this genre is lighting. With his culinary background, Jeff possesses a distinct advantage – he can not only capture the perfect shot but also prepare, style, and even cook the food, ensuring it looks as tempting as it tastes. His expertise allows him to offer a comprehensive service to clients, from food styling to the final image.

Jeff’s passion for lighting extends to the artistry of food photography, where he can create diverse moods – from bold and bright to dark and moody, depending on the desired effect. The ability to control every aspect of the photograph, including lighting, is what he finds most exhilarating.

While food photography may seem straightforward, there is much more to it than meets the eye. For instance, certain tricks are employed to ensure the food looks its best for the camera. For example, if a Thanksgiving turkey is to be photographed, it is often not cooked all the way through to maintain its plump and appealing appearance. Water droplets on fruits may be created with glycerin, which, while edible, may not be as enjoyable on the outside of a warm tomato.

MORE ON:

NEWS

Article continues below advertisement

Jeff notes that in some cases, substitutions can be made, such as using frosting instead of ice cream to maintain the desired texture and look without melting during the shoot.

Like many creative fields, photography faces challenges with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). While AI can enhance and simplify aspects of photography, it also has the potential to devalue the artistry and creativity of human photographers. Jeff acknowledges that AI can manipulate images easily, which could lead to an oversaturation of manipulated content.

However, he firmly believes that AI cannot replicate the true essence of artistry and creativity, as it can only execute what it is programmed to do. True artistic innovation comes from human vision and creativity.

burgers

As for his future in food photography, Jeff is content with his current endeavors but harbors aspirations of delving into fine art photography, reminiscent of the old masters’ paintings. He hopes to continue pushing boundaries and exploring new creative avenues within the realm of photography.

Jeff Couch’s journey from the kitchen to the camera lens is a testament to the boundless possibilities that await those who dare to follow their passions. His story is not just one of culinary artistry but also a celebration of the art of photography itself.

While AI may change the landscape of photography, artists like Jeff Couch remind us that true creativity and innovation cannot be replicated by machines. As he continues to illuminate the world of food photography with his unique perspective, we eagerly anticipate the visual delights he has yet to capture.

Advertisement

Art market icons talk to SOM class

Art market icons talk to SOM class

Courtesy of Magnus Resch

Controversy was a common thread at a Monday evening’s art talk at the Yale School of Management, which took place during the most recent class of “Entrepreneurship in the art market,” an interdisciplinary course that combines the arts and business. 

“I would say that we have three of the most controversial figures in the art world [with us tonight],” Magnus told the class before introducing the first speaker. 

Magnus Resch, an author and economist, is the instructor for “Entrepreneurship in the art market.” 

Every class session throughout the course begins with an artist talk. There are also guest lectures with a Q&A section prepared by student groups. 

Due to the nature of the class, the final project can be either a paper about the future of the art market or a piece of artwork students create that reflects what the they have learned.

“I’ve always been interested in the intersection of art and business,” Resch told the News. “It’s important for artists to understand what industry they’re really getting into.” 

The lineup began with Jeff Koons, the most expensive living artist, who was followed by art columnist Kenny Schachter and art collector Stefan Simchowitz — all three of whom dialed in on Zoom. An expensive artist is someone whose work is sold at high prices. 

Big names like these are typical for guest speakers in Resch’s course. Students in past years have heard from speakers including artists KAWS, Alex Israel ’03 and Tavares Strachan ART ’06. Other past speakers have included prominent figures in the business world, such as the CEO of Sotheby’s, Charles Stewart ’92 and the Chairman of the Fine Arts Division at Sotheby’s Amy Cappellazzo.

Every year, the course brings in notable players in the art world to speak directly to students about their experiences making, selling and buying art. The students also receive hands-on opportunities in the form of class trips to art fairs, such as the Armory Show in New York.

“Magnus is not only an engaging speaker, but his deep involvement in the subject matter makes the class feel authentic and dynamic,” Rafael Villares ART ’24 wrote the News. “Furthermore, the class serves as a unique intersection between two worlds often kept separate in academia. Many art schools shy away from discussing the art market with students, so this class is enlightening in that regard.”

Koons is a sculpture artist known for his large-scale works like “Balloon Dog,” “Puppy” and “Rabbit.” He has also made headlines for plagiarism and copyright infringement allegations. 

His works, which he self-described as having “transcended” the art world, have sold for millions at top galleries including Gagosian, Pace and David Zwirner.

Each discussion with the three speakers was framed around questions compiled by students in the class. The topics included art and technology, criticism and career planning. 

“I think what I’ve come to appreciate about this class and about the interview of the guest is that we’ve been really encouraged to ask the hard questions,” Samanta Cubias DRA ’24, SOM ’24 told the News. 

The prestige surrounding Koons’s work prompted Cubias to ask about the power imbalance between artists and the galleries and curators that they work with. She asked if Koons’ status had provided him with an upper hand in negotiations with gallerists.

Koons responded by saying that he enjoys the social and relational aspects of his job — working with galleries and curators — but his purpose in art making is always to serve his work and others. 

“Hopefully when people come into contact with my work, they realize their own potential,” Koons said.

During his interview in class, Koons also shared anecdotes about his family and his early life as an artist, mentioning the time he met surrealist painter Salvador Dali at The St. Regis Hotel in New York.

When one student asked him if there was “a point where you had to release the need to have your hands in every piece,” Koons’ responded that since his works have gotten larger, he has required a team of people to help execute his vision. Processes like casting, which Koons said he has other people do, “take a lot of instruction.” 

Koons said that he had to relinquish control over his work “Puppy,” which is composed of live flowers. Despite planning out where each flower was to grow, he said the ultimate creative decisions were up to nature.

The second speaker, Kenny Schachter, made his first appearance in the art world as a writer and critic. He now has a column for Artnet, an art market website, and has his own exhibitions.

Schachter did not elaborate much on current issues in the art world during the talk — beyond referring to the art market as “the most conservative, backwards business … 90 percent of which is old white rich people.”

“Women and people of color are [still] underrepresented in galleries and museums. It’s an uphill battle for a lot of [these] artists to make a living and find success and recognition for the work that they dedicate their lives to,” Leigh Bushnell SOM ’24 told the News after class.

During his segment of the talk, Schachter showed the audience his two most recent exhibitions, called “Keep hope alive” and “Kenny’s list.” 

Students in the class then asked Schachter to explain the meaning behind some of his most prominent works. One of the chosen pieces was “Koons Call of Duty,” a photo of Jeff Koons holding his balloon sculptures with an edited Call of Duty backdrop. The text in the foreground reads: “There’s an artist in all of us.”

When explaining the purpose behind his art, Schacter said that humor is often integral to his creative process.

Stefan Simchowitz spoke last. Simchowitz was recently profiled in The Wall Street Journal about his success in curation and art collection. Similar to the previous two speakers, however, he also received criticism and backlash during his career, with one New York Times headline referring to him as “The Art World’s Patron Satan.” Those that criticize Simchowitz’s work claim that he buys the work of young artists and then “flips” them to increase the prices before selling them to buyers. 

Simchowitz spoke about his non-traditional approach to curation and art collection. He discovers budding artists on Instagram, rather than through networking at art events.

In a similar way to the speakers at the talk, Resch said he entered the art world early on by selling art as a way to finance his undergraduate education. However, he said that art is not a very good investment.

“Don’t buy art as an investment, but to support artists and the art community,” Resch told the News when asked what advice he would give to students interested in art and business. 

“Rabbit,” a sculpture by Jeff Koons, sold for $91.1 million at Christie’s.


CHLOE EDWARDS




Chloe Edwards is a Photography Editor, as well as a Beat Reporter covering Arts in New Haven at the University. Originally from North Carolina, she is currently a sophomore in Branford College majoring in Cognitive Science.