Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S Review

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S Review

Introduction

The Z 85mm f1.2 S is an ultra-fast short telephoto portrait lens for Nikon’s extensive range of Z-series mirrorless cameras.

It’s primarily intended for use with professional Z-series full-frame cameras like the Z9 and Z8, but it is also compatible with Nikon’s APS-C camera range too, where the effective focal length would be 127.5mm.

Designated with the “S” moniker, lenses in this line are designed for ultimate sharpness (hence the S). It is the second f/1.2 lens for Z-series cameras, joining the Z 50mm f1.2 S prime.

Lens construction for the Nikon Z 85mm f1.2 S lens includes 15 elements in 10 groups, including 1 ED element, 2 aspherical elements and elements with Nano Crystal Coating. 

Nikon claims that this lens is incredibly sharp from edge to edge, and with its f/1.2 maximum aperture is ideally designed for low-light shooting.

The lens is completely dust and moisture sealed. There are 11 diaphragm blades which are designed to help produce attractive out of focus areas.

Portrait photography is the obvious kind of subject for an 85mm lens, but it’s also something you could consider for other subjects including pet photography, still life photography, street photography and wedding photography.

The Nikon Z 85mm f1.2 S lens is available now priced at £2999 / $2799 in the UK and USA, respectively.

This lens was first announced in February 2023. It is designed in Japan and made in China.

Ease of Use

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

The Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S is one of Nikon’s larger lenses in the Z series, with its size and weight being unsurprising considering the very wide maximum aperture of f/1.2.

It’s significantly larger than the much more compact 85mm f/1.8 S lens – and probably not one you’d want to consider as an “everyday” or “walk around” lens, but more for specific shooting requirements or events, such as portraits, weddings and so on.

At 1160g / 2 lb 9oz, it’s even heavier than the 50mm f/1.2 and much, much heavier than the f/1.8 version which tips the scales at a more manageable 470g.

Measuring 102.5mm x 141.5mm / 4.1in. x 5.6in. (diameter / length), again its a lot bigger than the f/1/8 lens, as you’d expect, which measures 75mm x 99mm.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Having said all of that, though, it still balances fairly well with full-frame cameras in the Z series – we’ve been using it with the Zf, but it would also work even better with the Z8 and Z9.

Although it will fit on the Nikon Z APS-C models, the smaller size of those cameras would make it very front-heavy and generally unwieldy to use.

Similarly to the other lenses in this line-up, build construction is very high quality, with a metal lens mount.

To attach the lens to your camera, you first need to line up the white dot around the base of the lens to the white dot on the lens mount.

Once you’ve done that, twist it to lock into place. When you want to release the lens, you need to push down the button at the side of the lens mount and twist in the opposite direction.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Like most Z mount lenses, the outward construction is fairly simple and straightforward. Towards the base you have the focal length and aperture written (85 / 1.2 S), while just next to it is a switch for moving between autofocus and manual focus. When working in autofocus, you can still manually override the focus if necessary.

A thin, ridged ring sits towards the base of the lens. This is a control ring which can be set to a few different functions via the main menu.

It will have a default option, for example adjusting aperture in aperture priority, but you can also assign it to exposure compensation or ISO sensitivity if you prefer.

You can even set it to have function whatsoever, which might be helpful if you were worried about accidentally knocking it and changing a setting.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

At the centre of the lens, you have one more control that is only found on Nikon’s more expensive, premium-end Z series lenses, namely a customisable L-Fn button.

Unlike the control dial, the L-Fn button can be assigned to a far greater range of controls, including metering, switching on raw, zooming into the scene (to check for focus), playback and much more. Again, you can also have it set to “none” if you prefer.

Strangely, there’s no OLED display window on this lens, as found on the comparable 50mm f1.2 where it displays either the aperture or focusing distance.

A large ring in the centre of the lens is used for adjusting manual focus. This is ridged and has just enough give to make slight adjustments easy to do.

However, it doesn’t have hard stops at either end to help you ascertain when you’ve reached the maximum/minimum focusing limit.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

If you are using manual focusing, there are some settings you can activate to make it easier. From the camera’s main menu, switching on focus peaking will help you ensure easier focus, while zooming into the scene can also ensure focusing is on point – which is especially important if you want to focus manually at very wide apertures such as f/1.2.

Focusing, if you choose to stick with autofocusing, is very quick, and very quiet, which makes it ideal for use in a wide range of situations where quiet focusing is advantageous – for example while shooting video, or in quiet places such as churches.

A very large lens hood is supplied in the box (HB-106), which you can attach to the front of the lens. To do this, you need to line up the white dot on the lens hood with the white dot at the front of the lens.

Simply then twist it to lock it into place – and do the reverse when you want to take it off. You can also turn the lens hood backwards for easier storage and transportation.

Focal Range

The Nikon Z 85mm f1.2 S lens has a single focal length. If using the lens on a full-frame camera with DX format activated, or with a DX-camera, the equivalent focal length is 127.5mm. The angle of view when shooting in FX format is 28°30’, and in the DX format, 18°50’.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Chromatic Aberrations

The Nikon Z 85mm f1.2 S lens has been designed to the highest optical standards, and as such we wouldn’t expect to find too much evidence of chromatic aberration. Usually typified as blue or purple fringing along high-contrast edges, it is often a problem with cheaper lenses.

We struggled to find any incidence of chromatic aberration appearing with this lens, even when examining images closely at 100%.

Vignetting

At the widest aperture of f1.2, there is some slight noticeable shading in the corners when photographing a white wall. This is not something which is overly noticeable with more usual subjects, and the effect lessens at f/2.0, before pretty much disappearing altogether at f/2.8.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Distortion

Pin-cushion distortion is well controlled in both the JPEG and RAW files.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Sunstars and Flare

The Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S is capable of creating quite nice sunstars when stopped-down to f/16, as shown below, and flare is also well controlled even when shooting directly into the sun.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Macro

The Nikon Z 85mm f1.2 S lens is not a designated close-up or macro lens, but thanks to its focal length, it’s still a good option to consider when shooting classic macro-type subjects, such as flowers. The minimum focusing distance is 0.85 m / 2.79 ft and the maximum magnification is 0.11x.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Bokeh

Bokeh is the word used to describe the out of focus area in an image. It is generally described in qualitative terms, such as creamy, smooth or pleasing.

With a very wide maximum aperture, 11 rounded diaphragm blades, and a mid-range focal length, we’d expect the bokeh from the Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S lens to be nothing less than stellar, and it certainly does not disappoint.

Bokeh here is rounded and attractive, while also producing a natural drop-off effect from the main subject. Since feelings on bokeh can be quite subjective, we have included some examples below to help you make your own mind up.

Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S

Sharpness

In order to show you how sharp the Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S lens is, we are providing 100% crops on the following page.

Phoenix Marketcity, Pune Unveils Majestic 25-Foot Lord Hanuman Sculpture Titled Divine Vibrations in Commemoration of Ram Mandir Inauguration

Phoenix Marketcity, Pune Unveils Majestic 25-Foot Lord Hanuman Sculpture Titled Divine Vibrations in Commemoration of Ram Mandir Inauguration
Pune (Maharashtra) [India], January 23: Phoenix Marketcity Pune is proud to announce a momentous celebration in honour of the historic inauguration of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. As a gesture of immense reverence and festivity, Phoenix Marketcity, Pune has unveiled an awe-inspiring 25-foot Lord Hanuman sculpture in the mall atrium on January 22, 2024.

Child-Friendly Camera Concepts

Child-Friendly Camera Concepts

Nicola Morelli reimagines the photography process from the lens of children with the new Camera for Kids concept design. It aims to transform the idea of a digital camera into a more tactile experience that activates functions through physical controls.

It is designed with the notion that kids will be functioning the camera with a shutter button activated by a water gun trigger or a crank lever used to alter the brightness and focus of the camera. Another example is pulling on a ‘TNT’ string to take timed photographs as it will shorten down to taking the shot. Due to the natural toy-like performance of the camera, it encourages a playful experience more than an intimidating one.

Image Credit: Nicola Morelli

REVIEW: “Dynamic Range: Photographs by Bill Tennessen”

REVIEW: “Dynamic Range: Photographs by Bill Tennessen”
Photo by Keifer Russell

The exhibit is on display in the Haggerty Museum of Art until May.

.sno-story-photo-area {
width: 100%;
margin-bottom: 0px;
max-width: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.sno-story-photo-area img {
object-fit: contain;
}
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-image-area {
height: unset;
max-height: unset;
background: #dddddd;
}
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-image-area img {
height: unset;
}
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-caption-area,
.sno-story-photo-area .captionboxmittop {
max-width: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
@media only screen and (max-width: 600px) {
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-caption-area {
padding-left: 20px;
padding-right: 20px;
}
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-image-area {
height: unset;
max-height: unset;
}
.sno-story-photo-area .sno-story-photo-image-area img {
height: unset;
}
}

“Dynamic Range: Photographs by Bill Tennessen” a photography exhibit at the Haggerty Museum of Art explores a range of themes in photography from sports, politics, Juneteenth and more. The exhibit is on display at the Haggerty Museum of Art from Jan. 19. until May 12. 2024. 

This exhibit was curated by Lynne Shumow, Curator for Academic Engagement, in collaboration with Robert Smith, Professor of history and director of The Center for Urban Research Teaching and Outreach at Marquette and Milwaukee’s Black Holocaust Museum. This exhibition is a collection of photographs taken by Milwaukee photographer Bill Tennessen. Tennessen is a graduate of Marquette’s College of Business Administration class of 1956 and worked as a photographer for the Milwaukee Community Journal.

This exhibit can be found on the second floor of The Haggerty Museum of Art. The exhibit divides the photographs into five different sections. In the first room when walking in, viewers can see photographs separated into five categories: “Community,” “Juneteenth,” “Ernest Lacy,” “Storefronts and Churches” and “The Arts.” In the second room of the exhibit, viewers can see the sections: “Sports,” “Politics” and “Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee.” 

The photographs are mostly from the 80s and 90s and display a range of political figures, famous athletes, Black youth at community events and the arts around the Milwaukee community. The exhibit especially highlights the tragic death of Ernest Lacy in 1981.

In the Ernest Lacy section of the exhibit there is a plaque explaining that 22-year-old Lacy, who was suspected of rape, was killed after an altercation with Milwaukee police officers. The plaque explains that after Lacy’s death he was ruled out as a suspect after identification from the victim.

“Hopefully some of the people that come in will see some familiar faces. You see a lot of joy in the black community. You see a lot of focus on family and community. There is one section that is very difficult about Ernest Lacey who was killed in police custody which is a very challenging aspect of the exhibition. It is very important though, and brings up ideas of history repeating itself,” Shumow said.

This section of the exhibit also contains photographs from the courtroom, photographs of marches that took place in Milwaukee on Wisconsin Avenue where Lacy was killed and a photo of Lacy’s parents at the day of his service.  

Shumow explained that this exhibit took about a year and a half to complete. She said that each photograph in the exhibit has an accompanying plaque to give context for the picture and what year it was taken. 

“There were a lot of photographs to look at, so I recruited my team to go with me to Mr. Tennesen’s house a few times. We brought hundreds and hundreds of photographs back here and we broke them down into categories. I had the ultimate discretion but it was a team effort to decide which photographs to include,” Shumow said. 

Shumow also explained the unique process of how this exhibition came to fruition. Bill Tennessen’s son Charlie Tennessen came into The Haggerty Museum of Art and asked to speak to a curator. Shumow said that normally the staff at The Haggerty come up with their own ideas for exhibitions. However, Charlie Tennessen explained that his father was a graduate of Marquette and Shumow agreed to sit down with him and began to look through the photographs.

Shumow said that at first this exhibit was meant to be in companion with another exhibit the museum was already working on, which was a photography exhibit using photographs from an artist from the south. 

“It was initially planned as a smaller exhibition in companion with the bigger photography exhibition. The exhibit would have a local and national component,” Shumow said. 

Shumow and her team of staff and interns later decided to dedicate a whole exhibit to Tennessen’s photographs. Shumow explains that each photograph within the exhibit are all photographs Tennessen took and printed. Choosing which photographs to include was a hard process given that Tennessen has thousands of negatives and a large archive of photograph Shumow said. 

Shumow also said that with Black History Month coming up in February, this exhibit was intentional and the curation team at the Haggerty Museum of Art wanted to do something for Black History Month by highlighting a Black photographer in the Milwaukee community. 

Shumow said that she hopes that viewers of the exhibit will enjoy seeing pieces of Milwaukee history as well as joy in Milwaukee’s Black community. 

This story was written by Avery Darrow. She can be reached at a[email protected].

Story continues below advertisement

How to be a responsible travel photographer

How to be a responsible travel photographer

When visiting a small town called Maheshkhali in southern Bangladesh, it began to dawn on me just how problematic some photography can be. Maheshkhali was quite busy that day: a small cruise ship, with an estimated 100 passengers, had anchored offshore and many of its guests had wandered into town, buying souvenirs, sipping on coconuts and taking pictures. On a residential back road, away from the bustle, a small child – no more than four years old – was playing in a yard. His cheeks were stained with mud and his clothes in tatters. A metre or so away, just by the gate, a western traveller was photographing him without the child realising. As he innocently rolled a burst bicycle tyre in the mud, the traveller snapped away, capturing a depiction of Maheshkhali without context.

Someone else’s shoes

There’s no denying that taking photographs while travelling is a lovely way of documenting a trip. It preserves the characters and colours we come across, adding depth to the memories we preserve in our mind. Yet what had happened in Maheshkhali isn’t an uncommon occurrence. A child was photographed by a stranger, without his or his parent’s consent. Would this not be problematic if it were happening back home?

Then there is the added complexity of context. Images can unintentionally trap people and places in a narrative that isn’t their reality. Around the corner from where that child played, a lively street market was filled with young entrepreneurs – mostly women – who were weaving and embroidering scarves, shawls and wraparound skirts. The photo of the child was taken without a connection to, or an understanding of, this community. Yes, photographs tell a story, but nuance shouldn’t be overlooked

Is it Instagrammable though?

Today, a travel photo shared on social media can take on a life of its own. Search on Instagram for #durdledoor and you’ll find over 300,000 photos showcasing almost identical scenes of the iconic limestone arch in Dorset. With their aerial views, glassy ocean and sunset backdrops, these are images filtered within an inch of perfection. Yet what these photos don’t explain is that this area is fragile: the surrounding limestone rock is crumbling and the grassland is diminishing. Signs ask visitors, arriving in their hundreds each day, to stay on the path, but people still scramble over the ropes and climb onto the ridge in the name of an Insta-worthy picture. The conservation of this remarkable British landmark and its surroundings is now in jeopardy.

In 2017, a survey by Schofields Insurance revealed that 40% of clients, aged 18 to 33, picked holidays depending on ‘how Instagrammable’ the destination was. It seems that Insta-worthy, tick-box culture has become a reason to travel. With no context, no learning and no real understanding of the place, is this really a healthy way to experience the world?

While most travellers’ intentions are harmless, we should afford the same courtesy to the places and people we come across that we would expect from others visiting our home towns. With all this in mind, perhaps it’s time to recoin the responsible traveller’s motto to, ‘Take fewer pictures, leave fewer footprints’.

Opinion | ‘Barbie,’ ‘Saltburn,’ Louis Vuitton: When Culture Becomes a TikTok Craze

Opinion | ‘Barbie,’ ‘Saltburn,’ Louis Vuitton: When Culture Becomes a TikTok Craze
image

In today’s creative economy, the tail increasingly wags the dog. Marketing is driving culture as promotional campaigns overshadow the offerings they seek to elevate — in fashion, music, art and film. With fashion weeks taking place around the world and awards season well underway, the hype machine is operating at full throttle. But few products, if any, can compete with such fanfare. On the runway, the red carpet and beyond, culture is at risk of being subsumed by the sound and the fury, the hype and the buzz, of its own promotion.

Fashion houses seemingly no longer hire creative directors for their design skills or aesthetic vision but for their marketing prowess. “The marketing guys frankly have invaded the companies,” Sidney Toledano, the former chief executive of Dior, said recently. This explains why there is less creativity on the runway and the most high-profile appointment in fashion last year was the rapper and music producer Pharrell Williams. In June, Mr. Williams presented his first men’s wear collection for Louis Vuitton, which, while confident and commercial, lacked “any new shapes, or ways of addressing the body, or thinking about luxury,” as the fashion critic Cathy Horyn put it. For Louis Vuitton, however, the show was an unqualified success: The star-studded spectacle attracted over a billion online views.

Marketing is nothing new, whether it’s deployed to promote consumer goods or creative works. First came the product, then the persuasion. But now the hype often precedes and overwhelms the product, to the point that the product seems almost irrelevant to its own success. “We have long moved beyond fabricating and selling products,” said Louis Vuitton’s chief executive, Pietro Beccari, contending that “fashion is becoming music, becoming pop culture, becoming a spectacle itself.”

“Barbie,” the top-grossing film of 2023, with nearly $1.5 billion in ticket revenues, was a sensation even before it opened in theaters. Its ubiquitous marketing campaign cost an estimated $150 million, more than its $145 million production budget. (In comparison, marketing across sectors averaged 10.6 percent of company budgets in 2023, according to a major industry survey.) Somewhere along the way, Barbiemania took on a life of its own, spawning countless social media memes and hundreds of items of bright pink merchandise. “It stopped becoming a marketing campaign and took on the quality of a movement,” said the Warner Bros. president of global marketing, Josh Goldstine.

Mr. Goldstine’s comment points to a new and expanded promotional terrain. Marketing campaigns provide the spark, but the news media kindles the conversation. By publishing articles about buzzy cultural offerings, the media responds to public interest, but also its own incentives: More clicks, views and engagement for sites and platforms. Performance metrics have laid bare the advantages of covering popular content. Social media works in tandem with these other promotional channels to reinforce the scale and scope of the phenomenon. Consider “Saltburn,” which, despite its lukewarm critical reception, has become “the most talked-about film of awards season” thanks to TikTok, where “Saltburn”related videos have netted almost four billion views.

As the chatter builds online and off, a self-perpetuating cycle takes hold: The campaign provides an occasion for press coverage; news articles fuel social media activity; viral excitement leads to more news and more posts, snowballing into a giddy and unstoppable “movement.” The chatter coalesces into an autonomous phenomenon, a meta-subject that is itself dissected and discussed, making the publicists of stars like Taylor Swift and Beyoncé famous in their own right.

In the 1990s, before the explosion of the internet, consumers had grown jaded about marketing and its methods, which they found manipulative. To influence this media-literate group, campaigns had to become subtler and cleverer. The internet gave advertisers even more opportunity to make ads that didn’t look like ads. But the rise of social media has taken this one step further: Consumers have become active participants in the marketing of culture, posting and sharing content that is effectively promotional, even if not intended as such. (The “Saltburn”-inspired reaction memes, dance videos, cocktail recipes and scented candles that went viral on TikTok before getting picked up by the press are cases in point.) Rather than cajole or badger, campaigns now invite consumers to join the conversation. They’ve recognized that anyone can amplify their message, whether through social media, traditional media or brand partnerships. It’s the ultimate soft sell.

Promotional movements have become as impressive as the products themselves, perhaps even more so. “Just as perfection only exists as an ideal never quite made flesh,” Whizy Kim wrote of “Barbie” for Vox, “Greta Gerwig’s desperately anticipated film based on the blonde plastic doll will necessarily disappoint some when the fantasy of its stunning promotion gives way to the reality of seeing the actual movie.” There have always been runaway hits, such as “Titanic” and “Gangnam Style,” but the product now seems strangely more like the beneficiary than the source of its promotional allure.

A video ad for the Christie’s 2017 “Salvator Mundi” auction might be an allegory for our time. Titled “The Last da Vinci: The World Is Watching,” the video never shows the actual painting but rather the misty-eyed, mouth-agape reactions of viewers, including Leonardo DiCaprio and Patti Smith. While the work had been dogged by questions about its condition and attribution, it overcame the issues raised by critics to become the most expensive artwork ever sold, fetching $450.3 million — a result that was deemed “a triumph for the dark art of marketing.” “Why Would Anyone Pay $450 Million for the ‘Salvator Mundi’?” an Artnet News headline asked, and answered: “Because They’re Not Buying the Painting.”

More cultural industries are prioritizing promotion over product as their traditional businesses arrive at impasses and breaking points. Some industries have faced declining profits, including music and film, where digital distribution has undermined long established revenue streams. Others have reached record heights, as in the case of luxury fashion, where megabrands have grown so large that a slowdown feels inevitable. Whether victims of changing business models or of their own success, these industries have come to view their core products with a degree of pessimism: Can they continue to deliver?

Marketing, on the other hand, confronts none of these inherent limits. In the best-case scenario, promotional efforts strike gold and trigger a popular craze, a mass movement. Today’s cultural phenomena, from “Barbie” to Taylor Swift, have approached a kind of sublime, with earnings that defy comprehension and fans so rapturous their cheers have caused seismic activity. But it is not just the cultural industries that benefit. For audiences, too, promotion adds value. Just as the crowd at the “Salvator Mundi” auction “gasped and whooped” at the artwork’s winning bid, we applaud the spectacle of success. It becomes a sufficient reason in itself to consume culture.

This stands in stark contrast with the ’90s, when consumers viewed marketing with suspicion and rebuked artists for going mainstream. The idea of selling out spoke to us because we encountered art in private. Discovering that something which had resonated with us so deeply was in fact a product of mass appeal brought with it a sense of betrayal. But today we venerate what is popular. We recognize that we are one in an army of consumers, and this knowledge conditions our experience of culture. In commercially successful art we find a sense of belonging. We take part in something larger than ourselves. We join the conversation. We become culturally conversant and delight in shared references. We like and comment and win public approbation. If art is a means to an end for others, why not for us, too?

Natasha Degen is a professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the author of “Merchants of Style: Art and Fashion After Warhol.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and Threads.

Yesterday’s Heroes: Gammy Smith, hand-coloured photographs, and the need for a national boxing museum

Yesterday’s Heroes: Gammy Smith, hand-coloured photographs, and the need for a national boxing museum

By Miles Templeton


I WAS recently contacted by John Vail, a very generous man. He had a hand-coloured photograph of a long-forgotten fighter, Gammy Smith of Cambridge, which he wished to go to a good home. Gammy was an old friend of John’s father and, when Gammy died in 1988, he did not leave a family behind to pass the photograph on to, and so John wished to give it to me.

I have long thought that there should be a national boxing museum around somewhere, as there is with football, and if there was such a place then it would prove the natural location for a lovely piece such as this to go to. When I get the time, it is my intention to see if something can be done along these lines.

Hand-coloured photographs were very popular at one time. Colour photography, at the time that Gammy was around in the1920s, was virtually non-existent and it wasn’t until the 1960s that the process became normal for personal photographs. This is why all the photographs of old greats like Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, and even Rocky Marciano, are in black and white.   For a young boxer from Cambridge in 1927 to ask an artist to hand-colour his black and white photograph was quite unusual, but this is what Gammy did, and the resulting portrait is quite beautiful. While I knew of the name Gammy Smith and had researched his fight record, I knew little about him or the details of his ring career. I think it fitting now to adorn this colour image, so rare, with a brief look at his exploits.

Gammy was a middleweight and a big fellow for his time. In the 1920s most young lads were inches shorter than they are today, and stones lighter. Times were hard and the diet was not good, especially for working class lads. Most professionals in Britain in 1927, when Gammy’s photograph was taken, weighed no more than nine and a half stone and most of them boxed between flyweight and lightweight.

This made Gammy stand out, and he didn’t have to fight his way past a myriad of little lads to establish himself. He was part of what was known as the ‘Cambridge School’, a group of fighters from the city who all emerged at about the same time and who all trained together in a School of Boxing. Gammy, along with Archie Allen and brothers Ed and Gilbert Stubbings, formed the backbone of the ‘School’ and they filled the bills at the Corn Exchange in their native city throughout the 1920s. He had 20 professional contests, only eleven of which were reported in the pages of BN. 

There was so much boxing around back then and BN, whilst capturing most of it, still missed an enormous amount. This is why the careers of boxers from that period are so hard to research.   Early in his career, Gammy suffered two losses at Bedford, going down to Johnny Seamarks, a very good fighter, and to Harold Bass by knockout. He then boxed in Ipswich a couple of times, wining one and losing one, before re-establishing himself with a long series of wins back at the Corn Exchange.

His first 15-rounder took place there in 1928 against Londoner, Mick Harris.  This was a return, as Gammy had beaten him six months previously over 12 rounds. Harris was dissatisfied with the verdict in their first encounter and Gammy was only too happy to meet him again. The two fought in front of a packed house and the BN report states that Gammy won this contest clearly.  In his next contest, Gammy knocked out a Canadian in five rounds and then followed this with good wins over Bert Cannons and Bill Softley.

Gammy boxed at the Blackfriars Ring a few times before bowing out in 1930, with an 11-9 record. He is forgotten now, but this picture does him proud. Thanks, John!

Celebrity photographer Joseph Sinclair dies suddenly aged 49

Celebrity photographer Joseph Sinclair dies suddenly aged 49
  • Sinclair had been shooting professionally for almost fifteen years 

Celebrity photographer Joseph Sinclair has died suddenly aged 49.

Sinclair captured everyone from pop stars Dua Lipa and Nicole Scherzinger to Normal People actor Paul Mescal and, most recently, the young stars of royal drama The Crown.

‘Joseph sadly passed away last Friday,’ his agent, John Parkinson, confirmed. 

‘I spoke to him around 4pm on the phone, then later found out that he had died that evening. We are all very sad – he was a very talented man.’

Sinclair had been shooting professionally for almost fifteen years.

The Crown stars Ed McVey and Luther Ford shot by Sinclair

Popstar Dua Lipa posing for Sinclair in Disney+ documentary

Nicole Scherzinger poses up in white as Sinclair showcases his photography skills

Sinclair captured the iconic shot of Paul Mescal after winning The Olivier Award for Best Actor for his role in A Streetcar Named Desire

He was inspired by films and music while growing up in England in the 80’s and 90’s.

Specialising in Celebrity Portraiture, his work has appeared in publications such as GQ, Esquire, Vogue, Sunday Times and Vanity Fair. 

He also shot publicity campaigns for Netflix, Disney, Amazon & HBO.

‘I began taking photographs when I was around eight years old. Fascinated by capturing people on film’, he wrote on his website.

‘It’s the passion to create that drives me.’

‘The wonderful thing about having a camera is you never know where it will take you, who you will meet and what the next exciting project will be.’