About

Posts by :

The art market counts the logistical cost of the Red Sea conflict

The art market counts the logistical cost of the Red Sea conflict

The conflict in the Red Sea is adding delays to art shipping for entities in the Middle East and for clients sending works between Asia and Europe.

“The current issues in the Red Sea are having a significant impact on our art logistics operations in the region,” says Thomas Schneider, the chief executive officer of Hasenkamp, a German art shipper who handles much of the logistics in the Arabian Gulf. “We are therefore increasingly using air freight rather than sea freight to maintain our high standards for the safe and timely delivery of artworks.”

Since November, Houthi rebels based in Yemen have been targeting shipping vessels travelling through the 1,200-mile-long waterway, mostly at the southern end, where the ships pass through a narrow strait between Yemen and Eritrea. A Houthi missile attack killed three seafarers on the Greek-owned, Barbados-flagged ship True Confidence last week.

The Red Sea is the main route for cargo ships sailing from Asia and the Middle East to Europe, and it is estimated that 15% of the world’s cargo passes through the sea.

The Houthis have said that their attacks are in retaliation for the war in Gaza, though they are attacking ships owned or flagged by a variety of countries, in addition to that of Israel and its allies, the US and the UK. In January, the US and its allies began a series of strikes on Yemen in response to the Red Sea attacks.

While most art shipping is concentrated between the US and Western Europe, entities in Asia and the Middle East that use the Red Sea route have had to find alternative routes and methods.

Looking for alternative routes

“In response to the disruption in the Red Sea, we have taken precautionary action to temporarily divert all affected sea freight to an alternate route which avoids this area,” said a spokesperson for Christie’s, which operates a route between London and Hong Kong. “We continue to monitor the situation, working with our partners and clients.”

Shipping companies and clients were reluctant to discuss the subject, but sources confirm that a number of Middle East events have been affected, including the Diriyah Biennale, for which Hasenkamp was contracted. The second iteration of Saudi Arabia’s contemporary art biennial opened outside of Riyadh on 20 February. There were delays on freight that was already en route in the Red Sea, and the shipping method had to be changed from sea to air for a number of works, with budget ramifications.

A spokesperson for the biennial said that he was unable to comment on internal logistics.

There are no reports of any works that were destroyed or harmed in the Houthi explosions.Beyond the Middle East, the effect on US and European art travel is little—largely because sea freight continues to be an unpopular route for sending work.

“The reality of the trade is that most of the time you don’t have the luxury of time to ship by ocean,” says Fritz Dietl, the chief executive officer of Dietl, the largest fine-art shippers in the US. “Or [the work] doesn’t fit into an ocean container, or the value is too high, or the items are just too sensitive to expose them to the potential environmental conditions of an ocean trip.”

Art shipping has become a vexed subject recently as environmental groups have identified air freight as one of the art world’s largest sources of carbon emissions. Victoria Siddall, a trustee of the advocacy group Gallery Climate Coalition, says sea freight can entail up to 90% fewer emissions than air freight.

The conflict’s effect on consumer goods, however, is much higher—particularly because a second pressure point has emerged in the lake of the Panama Canal, where water levels are so low that fewer ships can pass through. The disruptions to two key global crossings mean ships must take much longer routes around continents, adding days to supply chains and driving up insurance and other costs.

However, shippers say that the current worries around shipping are still far from the price rise during the Covid-19 pandemic, which was brought on by the cancellation of air travel. Most commercial passenger flights also carry cargo in their holds. The grounding of this ancillary means of shipping meant that the cost of sea freight spiked almost overnight.

And while the art trade might be insulated from the threats to sea shipping, it is still at risk from the wider market slowdown, which is noticeably reducing the amount of works being transported—by sea or by air.

Anabella Sarrias talks about human alienation

Anabella Sarrias talks about human alienation

In a Sardinia that blends ancient and modern, Michael Francalanci‘s photographic project, titled “The Last Healer of Sciatica,” plunges us into the mysterious and fascinating world of traditional healing. Francesco Bagattini‘s text accompanies the images, providing an in-depth look at the millennia-old practice passed down from generation to generation. In pre-war Sardinia, traditional medicine thrived, creating a collective knowledge where healers played almost magical roles. The island, now an Italian tourist destination, reveals a unique context: a historically closed region embracing modernity through tourism. Let’s delve deeper into Francalanci’s journey and the photographs documenting it.

Last autumn, Francalanci’s team spent weeks in the island’s interior, near Lake Omodeo, seeking individuals born after the war who still practice traditional healing. The focus was on those who, while fully integrated into contemporary society, continue ancient healing practices. Francesco, portrayed in the images, is a central figure in this project.

Francesco is seated in his laboratory, a stone room illuminated by a small square window. Behind him, against the wall, there’s a wooden cross and the History of Italy in comic book form. With his gaze fixed ahead, he tells us with his warm and low voice that in the 17th century, during the great pestilence that struck the island, a group of Jesuits returned from China to care for the sick. The religious brought with them seven healing practices (meighinas in Sardinian). The only one that has reached us, passed down through Francesco and his ancestors, is the treatment for sciatica.

Francesco’s healing ritual is fascinating and steeped in tradition. The practice takes place only during the waning moon, a period usually lasting for eleven days. «For each patient, Francesco gathers a wild fig branch. It is crucial that the tree is located outside the patient’s province (mandamento), in a spot where the rooster’s crow cannot be heard. To strip the branch and obtain a ribbon about a meter long, Francesco uses the same knife his grandfather used,» explains Bagattini in the project’s text. In Francalanci’s shots, the magic of these moments is captured. Images of Francesco during the practice, the fire consuming the fig knots at the end of the waning moon period, and the Sardinian landscape embracing this millennia-old tradition.

The narrative by Francalanci and Bagattini provides an intimate insight into this endangered practice. Francesco is indeed the fifth and final healer in his family, marking the end of a chapter that has endured for over a century. The family legend asserts that the practice can only be passed down for five generations, and with Francesco, the secret of the meighina against sciatica will slowly dissolve over time, bringing an end to an era of healers in Sardinia.

Courtesy Michael Francalanci

Kate Middleton breaks her silence about the Mother’s Day photograph controversy

Kate Middleton breaks her silence about the Mother’s Day photograph  controversy
image

Meanwhile another royal reporter Richard Palmer said the issue had been heightened into a real controversy, saying, ‘What should have been a way of dampening down the hysteria now threatens to add fuel to the fire.’

In January, it was announced Kate Middleton had been admitted to The London Clinic for scheduled abdominal surgery.

At the time, Kensington Palace said she would require ten to fourteen days to recover in hospital and would be unlikely to return to royal duties before Easter.

An official statement from the palace acknowledged the ‘interest’ this news will garner but asked for respect and privacy during what will no doubt be a challenging time for Kate’s closest family.

In a statement, a spokesperson said, ‘The Princess of Wales appreciates the interest this statement will generate.

She hopes that the public will understand her desire to maintain as much normality for her children as possible; and her wish that her personal medical information remains private.’

As such Kensington Palace said they would only provide ‘significant new information’ on her medical progress, to retain privacy for her medical information and her children’s lives.

Public theorising reached fever-pitch last month with concern spiking as a result of Prince Williams’ notable absence from his godfather King Constantine’s memorial service in Windsor Castle.

A representative for Kate told US Weekly: ‘We were very clear from the outset that the Princess of Wales was out until after Easter and Kensington Palace would only be providing updates when something was significant.’ They added only that the ‘guidance stands.’

The somewhat formidable response followed speculation on social media that the Prince of Wales was conspicuously missing from Constantine’s service because of the Princess’ ongoing health issues. A brief update followed by a palace aide at an event at Windsor Castle, who declared that ‘The Princess of Wales continues to be doing well.’ However the scandal of the image will do little to reassure fans.

Tatler has approached Kensington Palace for comment.

Royal photographer speaks out after Kate’s Mother’s Day photograph pulled

Royal photographer speaks out after Kate’s Mother’s Day photograph pulled

The decision by major picture agencies to pull the first picture of the Princess of Wales after her abdominal surgery, over fears it has been manipulated, is “very odd”, a royal photographer has said.

The photo, taken by Prince William in Windsor, was released by the royal family to mark Mother’s Day and showed Kate Middleton smiling surrounded by her three children. A few hours later the photo was recalled by picture agencies, including the Associated Press and Reuters.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4 Today’s programme on Monday (11 March), royal photographer Ian Lloyd said “manipulation” of royal photographs was “common”, but the decision to pull it was “very rare”.

Mr Lloyd added: “Someone at Kensington Palace is not vey good at Photoshop.”

Kate reveals SHE edited Mother’s Day portrai

Kate reveals SHE edited Mother’s Day portrai

The Princess of Wales has admitted that she edited the Mother’s Day portrait that was released by Kensington Palace yesterday and apologised ‘for any confusion’ that the family photograph has caused.

The Palace had come under mounting pressure to reveal the truth behind the photo after the world’s top picture agencies – including the Press Association – ‘killed’ the image over claims it had been digitally manipulated.

The photo of the mother-of-three beaming with Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis was the first official picture released of the princess since she underwent ‘planned abdominal surgery’ in January. 

A statement from the Princess of Wales said: ‘Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C’

A source stressed that this was ‘an amateur, family photograph taken by the Prince of Wales’.

They said the couple wanted to offer an ‘informal’ picture of the family together for Mother’s Day and the princess made ‘minor adjustments’, as she has shared in her statement on social media. An aide added: ‘The Wales family spent Mother’s Day together and had a wonderful day.’

It comes after PA – Britain’s most respected picture agency – this morning joined AP, AFP, Reuters, Getty Images and EPA in withdrawing the photo.

Kensington Palace yesterday released the first picture of the Princess of Wales since surgery

The Princess of Wales has admitted that she edited the Mother's Day portrait and apologised 'for any confusion' that it caused

The PA news agency said it had withdrawn the image of Kate from its picture service today

The UK’s national news agency said it had been ‘seeking urgent clarification about the image from Kensington Palace’ since it was released over claims it was digitally altered.

Statements from the picture agencies who have ‘killed’ the image

AP

‘The Associated Press initially published the photo, which was issued by Kensington Palace. The AP later retracted the image because at closer inspection, it appears that the source had manipulated the image in a way that did not meet AP’s photo standards. The photo shows an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand.’

AFP

‘It has come to light that the Handout issued by Kensington Palace today of Kate and the kids had been altered, therefore it was withdrawn from AFP systems.’

Reuters

‘We are removing this image following a post publication review.’

Getty Images

‘Earlier today our picture desk identified a problematic image provided to Getty Images by Kensington Palace. We can confirm the image in question was removed from our site in accordance with our editorial policy.’

PA 

A spokesperson for PA said: ‘Like other news agencies, PA Media issued the handout image provided by Kensington Palace of the Princess of Wales and her children in good faith yesterday.

‘We became aware of concerns about the image and we carried a report about it last night, and made clear that we were seeking urgent clarification about the image from Kensington Palace. In the absence of that clarification, we are killing the image from our picture service.’

 

Advertisement

But in a sensational development this morning, PA revealed that it had now withdrawn the image ‘in the absence of that clarification’.

A spokesperson for PA said: ‘Like other news agencies, PA Media issued the handout image provided by Kensington Palace of the Princess of Wales and her children in good faith yesterday.

‘We became aware of concerns about the image and we carried a report about it last night, and made clear that we were seeking urgent clarification about the image from Kensington Palace. In the absence of that clarification, we are killing the image from our picture service.’

PA became the sixth news or picture agency to retract the photo. 

The image of Kate and her children, said by the palace to have been taken by Prince William, was posted on social media.

Without an official response from the palace, confusion around the image had fuelled online conspiracy theories about Kate which have swirled on the internet since her abdominal surgery.

Ahead of Kate making her statement, royal commentator Peter Hunt said: ‘This is damaging for the royals. They knew there would be intense interest in any picture they released of Kate.

‘Their challenge is that people will now question whether they can be trusted and believed when they next issue a health update.’

The picture shows Kate sitting in a chair with her arms around Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, who are on either side of her, with Prince George standing behind, as all four smile at the camera.

But there was speculation that edits had been made to the left sleeve of Princess Charlotte’s cardigan, and other areas of the picture also raised concerns about possible manipulation.

In the social media post, Kate thanked the public ‘for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months’.

Within hours of the photo being shared around the world, multiple picture agencies issued a ‘kill notification’ – an industry term used to retract a photo previously handed out to publications.

Late on Sunday, the Associated Press became the first agency to ‘kill’ the photo over an ‘inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand’.

While AP said there was no suggestion the photo was fake, it retracted it because it said on closer inspection, the source had manipulated the image in a way that did not meet the agency’s photo standards. 

AP said its editorial standards state that images must be accurate and that it does not use altered or digitally manipulated images. 

The agency’s news values and principles explain that minor photo editing, including cropping and toning and colour adjustments, are acceptable when necessary for clear and accurate reproduction and should maintain the authentic nature of the photograph.

Kate also posted the apology on the Prince and Princess of Wales' Instagram account

It appears Charlotte's hand was copied over from another picture as there is an empty space where her sleeve should be

Kate's zip appears to be misaligned on the photo as the top of it is further left and appears significantly lighter than the rest of the zip

Charlotte's hair seems to end abruptly on her shoulder on her right despite her hair on the left going on for a few inches

The corner of Charlotte's skirt was pointed out as another 'editing error' by social media sleuths

As well as PA, five other picture agencies around the world have taken the extraordinary step of killing the photo of Princess Kate

Changes in density, contrast, colour and saturation levels that substantially alter the original scene are not acceptable. Backgrounds should not be digitally blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning. The removal of ‘red eye’ from photographs is not permissible.

When AP determined the photo appeared to have been manipulated, it issued what is known as a ‘photo kill,’ an industry term that retracted the image and instructed clients to remove the photo from their systems.

‘At closer inspection it appears that the source has manipulated the image,’ the AP said in its advisory. ‘No replacement photo will be sent.’

A second agency, Reuters, also withdrew the image ‘following a post-publication review’. ‘We are reviewing the matter,’ a spokesperson said.

Reuters picture editors said part of the sleeve of Kate’s daughter’s cardigan did not line up properly, suggesting that the image had been altered.

The agency could not immediately establish how, why or by whom the alteration had been made.

AfP then followed suit by issuing a ‘mandatory kill notice’ before Getty Images became the fourth agency to retract the photograph. EPA this morning also issued the same ‘mandatory kill’.

A spokesman for AfP said: ‘It has come to light that the Handout issued by Kensington Palace today of Kate and the kids had been altered, therefore it was withdrawn from AFP systems.’

A spokesperson for Getty Images told Sky News: ‘Earlier today our picture desk identified a problematic image provided to Getty Images by Kensington Palace. We can confirm the image in question was removed from our site in accordance with our editorial policy.’

Readers on X added a community note to a post from the Prince and Princess of Wales’ account which shared the photo. 

It said: ‘This photo is believed to be digitally altered and as a result many major news outlets have pulled the image from their reports.’ 

The Princess of Wales has not been seen since she attended the Christmas Day church service at Sandringham

The Prince and Princess of Wales's annual Christmas card image with their three children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, appeared to have a Photoshop fail. Louis' middle finger was missing in the photo

William has been stepping up royal engagements in Kate's absence. Pictured: Prince William and Princess Kate are seen at a  ceremonial welcome for The President and the First Lady of the Republic of Korea at Horse Guards Parade on November 21 last year

Kate left hospital on January 29 and returned to Adelaide Cottage in Windsor to be reunited with her children almost two weeks after having the surgery. Pictured: Kate and William in September 2022

The photo of the princess is the first released since she was admitted to the London Clinic, the private hospital where the King underwent treatment for an enlarged prostate, for a planned operation on January 16.

Charles, 75, visited his daughter-in-law’s bedside after being admitted himself on January 26, the 11th day of Kate’s stay.

She was also visited by her husband, William.

Kate left the hospital on January 29, almost two weeks later, and returned to Adelaide Cottage in Windsor.

Details of the princess’s condition have not been disclosed but Kensington Palace previously said it was not cancer-related and that Kate wished her personal medical information to remain private.

The 42-year-old future queen was last pictured in public during a Christmas Day walk in Sandringham, Norfolk.

Kate is not expected to return to official duties until after Easter, and William, 41, temporarily stepped back from his royal role to juggle caring for her and their children as she recovered.

He returned to royal duties in February and is expected to carry out an engagement linked to his Earthshot environmental prize on Monday, as well as accompanying the Queen at events to mark Commonwealth Day.

Earlier this month the Army was forced into an embarrassing about-turn after suggesting Kate would attend Trooping the Colour on June 8.

Tickets were being sold for the event, with Kate expected to attend in her role as Colonel of the Irish Guards, the regiment which is trooping its colour this year.

However, it is understood the Army did not seek approval from Kensington Palace before publishing the page, and the website was subsequently updated to remove the reference to her.

In photos: the controversial ‘betel nut beauties’ of Taiwan

In photos: the controversial ‘betel nut beauties’ of Taiwan

Constanze Han’s photo project explores and documents an ‘intimate, peculiar’ aspect of Taiwanese culture which has obsessed her since childhood

11March 2024

Constanze Han’s earliest memories of Taiwan are the long drives her family would take to visit her grandfather in the countryside. In the late 90s, the highway that stretched from Taipei in the north to the agricultural plains in the south was lined with betel nut stalls – small, brightly lit glass booths twinkling with neon signage. Inside, young women dressed in lingerie or cosplay costumes would sit and wait for vehicles to pull up, before running out to interact with the drivers. 

As a child, Han would gaze wide-eyed at these girls, and press her parents about them. Initially dismissive of her questioning, they eventually gave in and explained that these women were “betel nut beauties”, hired to sell betel nuts – the fruit of a palm plant chewed as a stimulant. While the consumption of betel nuts is popular in many parts of Asia, particularly among long-haul truck drivers, hiring betel nut beauties to attract customers emerged as a distinctly Taiwanese phenomenon in the 1960s.

“The lights, colours and outfits really made you feel like a spectator driving through an interactive show,” Han tells Dazed, recollecting those vivid impressions from childhood. “They were so fascinating and visually powerful that the image of the betel nut beauties never went away. When I became a photographer, it was always at the back of my mind that this was something I wanted to photograph.”

Now in her thirties and working as a documentary and portrait photographer in New York, Han returned to Taiwan in August 2022 to do just that. The result is her intimate and inquisitive photo series, The Betel Nut Beauties (Bing Lang Xi Shi), the first instalment in an ongoing body of work about Taiwanese culture. 

I didn’t go back to Taiwan for over a decade, and during that time, I felt confused about the meaning of Taiwanese identity. Even as part of the Taiwanese diaspora, my own understanding of Taiwanese culture outside of food and politics felt very limited,” Han explains. “It felt like Taiwan was only ever in the international media for its position as a bargaining chip in the power struggle between China and the US. So I went back for a summer with a desire to photograph things that felt specific to Taiwan – intimate things, peculiar things, and the betel nut beauties were the first.” 

“It was always at the back of my mind that this was something I wanted to photograph… So I went back for a summer with a desire to photograph things that felt specific to Taiwan – intimate things, peculiar things, and the betel nut beauties were the first” – Constanze Han

Han hired a driver and set off on the same roads she’d travelled down as a kid, intending to spend time with and photograph the betel nut beauties at work. As with all her documentary projects, which have taken her from Mexico to Honduras and Cuba in recent years, she wanted to photograph them in a way that was “nonjudgmental and immersive”. But during the first week of her trip, she was struck by the marked absence of betel nut beauties on the roadsides. “I had expected to walk right into my memories and see betel nut beauties everywhere, but this just wasn’t the case,” she recalls. “There were far fewer betel nut stalls overall, and a lot of them were operated by middle-aged male attendants or their family members.”

The reasons for the decline in betel nut beauties, Han found, were complex. “It’s best broken down into a stigma against betel nuts and a stigma against the women themselves, many of whom are from underprivileged backgrounds,” she reflects. In the early 2000s, growing research into betel nut consumption revealed associated health risks, such as mouth ulcers and cancer, while environmental issues from the upsurge of betel nut planting were also brought to light. As Han contends: “These are all valid issues, of course, but as health and environmental concerns arose, it was the betel nut beauties who faced the harshest judgement from society and the strictest regulations from the government.” 

In 2002, local governments in Taiwan started to impose laws concerning the dress code of betel nut beauties, prohibiting the wearing of overly revealing clothes. In some areas, girls could be fined for showing cleavage or midriffs. Debates arose about how much skin was too much skin, and whether this marketing technique was exploitative or empowering – an example of objectification, or about the right to capitalise on one’s own image. 

It was important to Han to learn more about the women working the stalls today. In speaking to the beauties, she wasn’t surprised to learn that many are just doing their best to make ends meet. “It really is just a job, and the sexy clothing they wear is just a uniform,” she says. “I think what surprised me was that some of the girls quite liked the work, and enjoyed the autonomy of working alone. Most of them said that their customers were quite nice – usually men who seemed lonely and wanted a little conversation. Most also said they rarely felt creeped out or in danger.”

Han spent a memorable afternoon in a park in Taoyuan chatting to an 18-year-old woman named Mong Shuan. “Orphaned as a child, she started working at 15, first as a waitress at a hostess bar, then as a package handler. She even explored webcam work for its higher income potential, but found selling betel nuts to be the most consistent and stable option,” Han relays. “She’s earning the money she needs to go to beauty school.” 

While selling betel nuts is a means to an end for someone like Mong Shuan, Han met others who aspired towards owning their own stalls and working for themselves. There were also those who marketed their services online and produced merch – key chains and ashtrays adorned with selfies.

“From what I’ve experienced, rather than loud condemnations, disapproval comes in the form of silent judgement – especially when it comes to women, and women wearing scanty clothing” – Constanze Han

In response to the lingering controversy around the practice, Han’s intention was never to arrive at any kind of judgement. Her images are more about providing a visual record of a tradition that might eventually phase out, and capturing a phenomenon that is “at once so uniquely Taiwanese, and also a bit of a strange contradiction within Taiwanese culture”. 

Taiwan is a pretty tolerant place, and it’s been praised for its progressive legislations, like 2019’s legalisation of same-sex marriage. But I feel like the culture is, broadly speaking, still pretty quiet, restrained, and conservative,” she explains. “From what I’ve experienced, rather than loud condemnations, disapproval comes in the form of silent judgement – especially when it comes to women, and women wearing scanty clothing. So it always seemed a little unreal that this practice occurred so openly and in broad daylight.”

While Han’s focus is now on her upcoming photobook, which explores nail culture globally, she intends to return to Taiwan in the near future, continuing to use childhood memories as a starting point “to understand and document things that feel distinctly Taiwanese”. 

Follow Constanze Han on Instagram for updates on this ongoing series. 

Winner Announced Of New Prize For Best Emerging International Photographer 2024

Winner Announced Of New Prize For Best Emerging International Photographer 2024
image

American photographer Keisha Scarville is the winner of the Saltzman Prize, a new award for the best Emerging Photographer in the world. This annual prize is a $10,000 award and additional funds to support a solo exhibition of the winning photographer’s work at Photofairs New York each September. The Saltzman Prize is presented in cooperation with the Center for Photography Woodstock (CPW) and Photofairs New York. The winner will also be honored on 20 April 2024 at the CPW Vision Awards.

The other nine shortlisted artists were: Hady Barry, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire; Eric Gyamfi, Accra, Ghana; Patrice Aphrodite Helmar, Juneau, AK / New York, NY; Nhu Xuan Huay, Paris, France; Hailun Ma, Shanghai. China / New York, NY; Rory Mulligan, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY; Trina Michelle Robinson, San Francisco, CA; Caroline Tompkins, New York, NY; and Wilfred Ukpong, Oxford, UK / Clermont-Ferrand, France / Eket, Nigeria.

This years’ Saltzman Prize nominators include MoMA curator Oluremi Onabanjo, British curator and cultural historian Mark Sealy, New York-based curator and writer Lyle Rexer, American photographer Deana Lawson, and The New York Times Opinion photo director Jacqueline Bates. Each nominator put forth two photographers to create a shortlist for the Prize. From the shortlist, CPW’s jury panel of three photography experts selected the year’s emerging photographer. The jury this year was MacArthur fellow and photographer Deborah Willis, the President of the Magnum Foundation Susan Meiselas, and the Director of Asia Society Yasufumi Nakamori.

Brooklyn-based photographer Keisha Scarville weaves together themes of transformation, place, latencies and the elusive body. Since the early 2000s, Scarville has been exploring ideas around belonging, place, and embodied narratives across mediums, particularly photography. Scarville’s personal background merges two distinct geographies, Guyana and America, which act as a large source of inspiration throughout her work.

Many of her works reflect on the symbolism of West African figures and the immigrant experience of her Guyanese-American parents. In one of her most important series, Mama’s Clothes, Scarville created portraits using her dead mother’s clothing, making a collaboration between absence and landscape to foster a space that enables the reemergence of her mother’s presence through her own body and identity. Her work has been exhibited at the Studio Museum of Harlem; ICA Philadelphia; The Caribbean Cultural Center African Diaspora Institute; and The Brooklyn Museum of Art. Scarville recently published a new artist book lick of tongue, rub of finger, on soft wound (MACK, 2023), which was shortlisted for the Aperture/Paris Photo First PhotoBook Award.

Hady Barry is a Guinean-American artist whose practice involves photography and sound. Her work has been featured in the British Journal of Photography, NAATAL, and Contemporary And. It has been exhibited by the National Portrait Gallery (UK).

Eric Gyamfi is a photographer living and working in Accra, Ghana whose works have been featured in A Diagnosis of Time; Unlearn What You Have Learned, Ecologies and Politics of the Living (Vienna Biennale 2021), and Bamako Encounters – African Biennale of Photography (2017 and 2019).

Patrice Aphrodite Helmar, born in Juneau, Alaska worked in a small-town camera shop and darkroom growing up and continues to work in photography. Helmar’s work has been shown at the Jewish Museum, Ortega Y Gasset Projects, Gaa Gallery, and the National Museum of Iceland.

Nhu Xuan Hua, a French photographer and artist with Vietnamese heritage. reinterprets archival family pictures through digital interventions, exploring the effect of dissipation generated by the passing of time and driven by the forces of inherited memory.

Hailun Ma’s fashion photography experience in New York inspired her to rediscover her hometown of Xinjiang, China differently: since 2018 she has shown an appreciation for Xinjiang’s culture, fashion, and youth.

Rory Mulligan is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Art at Drew University in Madison, New Jersey. Mulligan’s work has been exhibited nationally and internationally and is included in the permanent collections of the Philadelphia Museum of Art

Trina Michelle Robinson explores the relationship between memory and migration through installation, film, print media, photography, and archival materials.

New York based Caroline Tompkins has worked with editorial and commercial clients such as Apple, The New York Times, Vogue, Hinge, Rolling Stone, and Gap and has photographed an array of magazine covers, including those for Time Magazine, Esquire, Buffalo Zine, and GQ.

Wilfred Ukpong is a French Nigerian artist and researcher whose socially engaged practice utilizes interwoven mediums, including photography, film, sculpture, performance, architecture, and creative workshops, to tackle social issues with community participation and intervention.

The Saltzman Prize was founded in 2023 by New York-based photographer, film producer, and philanthropist Lisa Saltzman in collaboration with CPW, where she is a Trustee. Lisa created the Saltzman Family Foundation in 2020 in honor of her parents, Ralph and Muriel Saltzman, and has already developed two major arts awards through the Foundation, namely The Ralph Saltzman Prize in partnership with the Design Museum in London, which celebrates emerging product designers; and the Fashion Institute of Technology’s Ralph Saltzman Prize Student Contest, which challenges students to design innovative fabrics.

5 Artists To See at The Other Art Fair’s Los Angeles Edition This April

5 Artists To See at The Other Art Fair’s Los Angeles Edition This April

Cortney Herron, “Position No. 13” (2024), oil on canvas

Get your art fix at Saatchi Art’s The Other Art Fair, returning to Los Angeles from April 4 to 7. This edition promises an eclectic lineup of more than 140 independent, game-changing artists taking over the Barker Hanger in Santa Monica. Tickets are now available for an experience that promises to deliver the unpredictable.

This spring edition kicks off with some fresh additions, including outdoor sculpture installations by Misha Libertee and Ivan Butorac; “Perceive Me,” a nude sketch portrait experience by Kristine Schomaker aimed at promoting self-love and positive body image; and live performances during Opening Night and the sought-after Friday Late party.

As the weekend unfolds, the fair transforms into a buzzing hive of activity, attracting art aficionados and design mavens on the hunt for fresh inspiration. But it’s not just about serious collectors—casual browsers are also in for a treat, searching for those unique gems that scream individuality.

And foodies, you have not been forgotten! In the embrace of the city’s sunshine and just steps from the aisles of art will be food trucks serving up delights (Heritage Kitchen LA, Veggie Bomb, Vivace Pizza), espresso drinks, and a bar that just won’t quit. It’s a vibe that’s hooked Los Angeles thrill-seekers and art lovers from all walks of life, from the mildly curious to seasoned collectors.

Here are five artists to see in this upcoming edition:

In the vibrant tapestry of Los Angeles’ artistic landscape, figurative painter Cortney Herron weaves her creative narrative through acrylic and digital mediums. With a color palette that dances across her canvas and an interplay of organic lines and shapes, Herron finds delight in upholding an authentic artistic process. She champions the incremental layering of each brushstroke, inspired by textures found in nature.

 

Steven Rahbany, “Funeral Bouquet #2” (2023), mixed media: acrylic on soft (yarn, cotton, fabric)

Steven Rahbany specializes in the intricate craft of hand-sewn pillows. Using his graphic design background, he blends the art of typography with a tapestry of memories, weaving together strands of nostalgia and contemporary issues within the fabric of his one-of-a-kind creations.

 

Fujiko Rose, “Hidcote” (2021), ink on paper

Fine and decorative artist Fujiko Rose joyfully explores the intersection of nature and design. Recognized as the Sky Arts Landscape Artist of the Year in 2019, Rose’s artistic expressions, predominantly brought to life through monochrome ink, echo the timeless allure of antique intaglio prints cherished by her mother, alongside the vivid imagery that shaped her artistic journey from an early age.

 

Vanessa Valero, “Continent Sculpture” (2022), wood on soft (yarn, cotton, fabric)

Journeying through nature’s intricate tapestry, textile artisan Vanessa Valero engages in the meticulous craft of hand-tufting tapestries and embroidering drawings. She navigates vast landscapes, aiming to capture the grandeur of towering mountains and the delicate allure of minuscule particles.

 

Mallory Morrison, “Mystical” (2020), limited edition of 10 photographs, digital on paper

Committed to perfecting her craft by exploring novel techniques and ideas, Mallory Morrison immersed herself in the world of underwater photography. Having initially built her reputation in dance photography, her transition beneath the water’s surface enables her to harness the ethereal quality of weightlessness, weaving narratives that dive into the intricate realms of movement and composition.

See work by all these artists and more at The Other Art Fair’s Los Angeles edition, on view from April 4 to 7. 

Grab your tickets for an unforgettable weekend at theotherartfair.com.

Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $5 per month. The article 5 Artists To See at The Other Art Fair’s Los Angeles Edition This April appeared first on Colossal.

Photographers what REALLY went wrong with Kate’s Mother’s Day photo

Photographers what REALLY went wrong with Kate’s Mother’s Day photo

The Princess of Wales’ Mother’s Day portrait is so full of errors and so ‘sloppily’ edited that it should never have seen the light of day, experts told MailOnline today.

Prince William has been urged to release the original photo he took after at least 16 mysterious manipulations have been spotted in the 24 hours since its release.

The innocent Mother’s Day picture of the Princess of Wales and her three children has sparked an international scandal after most of the world’s major picture agencies ‘killed’ the image and questioned its integrity.

Kensington Palace is yet to comment but photographers have had their say on what they think has happened and digitally altered.

Some believe Prince William has used an AI tool such as ‘Best Take’ found on a top of the range £1,059 Google Pixel 8 phone, which merges a burst of pictures into one perfected image to ensure all those in the images are smiling and have their eyes open, for example. But this can lead to blurred lines and glitches in final images.

Others have blamed ‘sloppy’ use of Photoshop or other computer software such as Topaz routinely used to improve images. 

One photographer told MailOnline today that one of the few things that the public can be sure of about the controversial image is that Kate was sat with her children for the portrait. But Katie Mortimore believes it was then ‘manipulated’ tremendously to create the ‘perfect family photo’.

Paul Clarke said he wondered if it was so drastically changed that even ‘snot on a sleeve’ of a royal child or another mark may have been removed to perfect every element of the final released image.

MailOnline can reveal the verdicts of leading experts from around the world about the ‘CuffGate’ scandal, so named because Princess Charlotte‘s left hand is misaligned with the sleeve of her cardigan, casting doubt on the authenticity of the image and leading to the rare ‘kill notice’ for a royal picture. 

EPA are among the agencies to 'kill and delete' alert amid questions about how heavily edited the photo of Kate on Mother's Day with her children really was

Charlotte's floating left wrist is believed to be the reason that picture was pulled

MailOnline has found at least 16 potential issues with the photo

Photo is manipulated using two or more pictures and software

Photographer Katie Mortimore believes the photo has been heavily changed using software.

She said: ‘The photo is clearly manipulated. What is not clear is if it is a combination of two similar frames to look its best or is a fabrication in parts.

‘I personally am fairly confident the Princess of Wales was sat in the chair with her children but without her arms around them. To be fair with recent major abdominal surgery that sort of reach of both arms would likely be painful.

‘I don’t believe this is the first manipulated image from the palace BUT this coincides with the Princess’ illness so only raises more questions rather than dispelling them.

‘The palace would be best to release the raw image to agencies but I would be surprised to see it happen. Why did the image get manipulated? I suspect the Princess did it as a keen photographer wanting to create a near perfect family photo’.

Google Pixel AI tool used 

Patrick Whitty, who takes pictures for the New York Times, TIME and National Geographic tweeted: ‘My guess is that it was taken with the Google Pixel 8, with the “Best Take” feature, which chooses the “best face” for each person and automatically merges them into one photo.

‘There are so many red flags in this photo from Kensington Palace. Surprised the wires would move it

Cleaned up with a ‘clone tool’ 

Freelance photographer Paul Bevan tweeted: ‘I don’t think it’s dodgy. Someone was trying to clean the photo up a bit and used the clone tool and did not use it very well and they were pushed for time to get the photo out. I’d like to see the original version’.

Images taken at a single shoot were combined

Jon Mills, Group Picture Editor of SWNS, the UK’s second largest press agency told MailOnline: ‘However the Palace ended up releasing this particular image it’s really clumsy editing, it wasn’t done by a professional. 

‘But the quality of the image is consistent so my best guess is that elements from images taken at a single shoot were combined. It probably shows the pressure the Prince of Wales is under to show his family in the best light rather than any attempt to deceive’.

Removal of snot on a sleeve? 

Paul Clarke, one of Britain’s most experience photographers, said that problems may have been caused by the search for a perfect picture, and perhaps trying to clean up imperfections.

‘Here we have puzzling decisions about the picture’s creation and it’s sloppy editing (a bit of snot on the sleeve? who knows) that just don’t make much sense’, he tweeted.

‘There are numerous 100%-certain photographic manipulations easily visible on that Kate photo. What were they thinking?’