Photography

How Steve McCurry captured the incredible acrobatics of China’s Shaolin monks

How Steve McCurry captured the incredible acrobatics of China’s Shaolin monks


CNN
 — 

Editor’s Note: In Snap, we look at the power of a single photograph, chronicling stories about how both modern and historical images have been made.

A young Shaolin monk runs horizontally across a wall, intense concentration, and perhaps a hint of astonishment, visible in his face. Four other trainees at a martial arts academy near the Shaolin Temple in China’s Henan province lounge nonchalantly, seemingly unaware of the gravity-defying action taking place above their heads. Their bright orange robes and Feiyue sneakers stand in contrast to the earthen wall behind them.

The blurred back of a man on the left side of the image highlights the sharp movement at its center. A monk stretching in the background demonstrates his dexterity in a split-like stance.

“There’s this high-level action,” photographer Steve McCurry told CNN of the photo’s composition in a video call from his home in Philadelphia. “And these other boys are just hanging out.”

The image is featured in Magnum’s Square Print Sale, which ends May 5, alongside other photographers’ works. He shot it back in 2004, as part of a personal project, while traveling the world to document various forms of Buddhism. While he doesn’t consider himself to be Buddhist, McCurry has long been interested in the religion and applies some of its principles to his own life.

The Shaolin Temple – which was founded in AD 495 on the slopes of the sacred Mount Song – is said to be the home of Chan Buddhism. Although the religion emphasizes nonviolence, the temple’s warrior monks initially practiced martial arts to defend themselves from bandits. Over time, their rigorous physical training became inexorably linked with their quest to achieve enlightenment.

Today, Shaolin kung fu is widely known, and the monks’ feats in athleticism have been emulated in popular movies. The 1982 movie “The Shaolin Temple,” which launched Jet Li’s career and was filmed on location, was one of the films that brought renewed interest in the monastery. By the time McCurry visited in 2004, dozens of martial arts schools had sprung up on the road leading up to the temple.

“It’s incredible to watch them perform and train,” he said. “You can’t imagine that people can actually do that with their bodies.”

A career on the road

McCurry started his career working at a local newspaper after graduating from Pennsylvania State University. He then started traveling abroad as a freelance photographer, shooting images of people in some of the world’s most dangerous and remote places.

His career took off in earnest after he snuck across the border from Pakistan into Afghanistan in 1979, right before the Soviet invasion. He smuggled film out by hiding it in his clothing, providing the world some of the first photos of the conflict that left at least 500,000 Afghans dead and millions displaced.

His 1984 “Afghan girl” photograph – which captured the piercing green eyes of a 12-year-old refugee in Peshawar, Pakistan and was featured on National Geographic magazine’s June 1985 cover – is one of the world’s most famous photos.

Over the course of his 50-year career, McCurry, now 74, has filled more than 20 passports, snapping animals and festivals, worshippers and fighters, conflicts and catastrophes in destinations from Niger to India. He captures the ancient against the modern, the curious amid the day-to-day and accentuates the familiarity of strangers.

In 2016, McCurry came under fire when one of his photos in an exhibition was discovered to be digitally altered. He said it had happened in his studio while he was out traveling, but more images that appeared to be manipulated began surfacing, igniting a debate around the ethics of photojournalism.

In response to the allegations, the photographer told Time magazine later that year that beyond the brief stint at the local newspaper in Pennsylvania, he had never been employed by a newspaper, news magazine or news outlet. As a freelancer, he had taken on various assignments, including advertising campaigns. He said his work had “migrated into the fine art field” and that he considered himself a “visual storyteller.”

He added that he understood it could be “confusing … for people who think I’m still a photojournalist,” and that going forward, he would only use Photoshop “in a minimal way, even for my own work taken on personal trips.”

Shaolin Monastery or Shaolin Temple, a Chan Buddhist temple on Mount Song in Dengfeng, Zhengzhou..

‘Going back again and again’

Before shooting the photograph of the wall-running monk, McCurry had already paid a visit to the Shaolin Temple two decades earlier. He says it was “really empty” during that first trip, and he saw only “bicycles and people in these Mao suits.”

By the time he returned, a kung fu craze had gripped the nation. The area felt more commercial, he recalled. Tens of thousands of (mostly) Chinese boys and men were inspired by a wave of kung fu movies, and were training at the dozens of schools in the area.

The photographer was granted permission at one of the academies and spent a few days with the monks as they went about their daily routine, which included practicing acrobatics on repeat. Some of the boys ate with McCurry at a noodle joint across the street, sharing their hopes to eventually land jobs in security services, performance troupes, as well as the entertainment industry. “They were normal kids,” he said. “But they were very, very dedicated and serious about this practice.”

He captured other photographs of monks’ intense training regimes during his stay, including several hanging upside down by their feet, hands calmly pressed into a prayer pose.

McCurry sought to find the right combination of variables like the subject, angle, light, and background, as the monks perfected their moves. “It’s a (matter) of photographing and going back again and again.”

His perseverance paid off. “It’s a picture that evokes a lot of emotion,” he said of the final shot of the wall-running monk. “It either brings a smile to people’s faces, or they’re kind of in awe of the physicality of these young boys.”

Tuesday, May 7: Focus on Photography

Tuesday, May 7: Focus on Photography

Advertisement

Tuesday, May 7: Focus on Photography

A picture is worth a thousand words, and thanks to technology we all have the ability to capture powerful images.

We visit the Griffin Museum of Photography in Winchester to discuss how that’s changing the landscape. We catch up with a photographer whose job it is to tempt your tastebuds. Capturing stunning birding images is no longer only for wildlife photographers; we meet a local man finding inspiration overhead. Speaking of inspiration, one local photographer finds it – and plenty of history – on the streets of Boston.

We visit the Griffin Museum of Photography in Winchester to discuss how that’s changing the landscape. We catch up with a photographer whose job it is to tempt your tastebuds. Capturing stunning birding images is no longer only for wildlife photographers; we meet a local man finding inspiration overhead. Speaking of inspiration, one local photographer finds it – and plenty of history – on the streets of Boston.

Advertisement

Hard Copy, the art show finding salvation in Xerox printing

Hard Copy, the art show finding salvation in Xerox printing
image

An estimated 63,000 images are captured globally every second, or 5.3 billion every day. The vast majority of these are taken on smartphones, condemned to forever reside in the incorporeal digital world of 0s and 1s. Meanwhile, physical copies are increasingly hard to find. For artist Aaron Stern, the mechanical whirr and beep of the Xerox printing machines stands as a staunch opposition to this trend, its deliberate, almost painstaking process of printing hard copies offering a return to a time when picture-making was more deliberate. 

Hard Copy, curated by Stern, showcases contemporary photography from 20 artists, including Gray Sorrenti, Katsu Naito and Shaniqwa Jarvis, laboriously scanned and xeroxed for physical consumption.  Through their unmistakable vertical streaks and brutalist grayscale, these Xerox prints are both alluring and mysterious, providing a nostalgic look back at the enduring power of the photographic medium, as well as a celebration of today’s luminaries. 

“There are 1 trillion, mostly digital, mostly garbage, pictures made every day. It’s nice to see good ones in person,” says Stern. “More than anything – I wanted to do what I wanted to do. Repurpose work of other artists. In collaboration with them. I did it all mostly for the process. Gave me an excuse to talk to my friends. That I put in the exhibition. And a good reason to reach out to people I’ve wanted to work with.”

As for the images themselves, you’ll have to see with your own eyes to find out. “If you look close enough, you most probably might find yourself here,” Sorrenti cryptically announced on Instagram last week. According to Stern, her contribution comprises 900 images, pulled from Facetime, and collaged to make a staggering 61-foot-long mural.

The exhibition launches at 6-9pm this evening (May 3) at downtown New York’s WSA building, 161 Water Street, showcasing until the end of the month. Come jam with the printed medium and hope the printer doesn’t jam.

Chief Photographer Chuck Sibley signs off after more than 51 years

Chief Photographer Chuck Sibley signs off after more than 51 years

ROCHESTER, Minn. (KTTC) – Chief Photographer Chuck Sibley set down his video camera after more than 51 years at KTTC Friday.

He joined the KTTC team on the news set at 6 p.m. for a final goodbye and glimpse back at his decades behind the camera.

He also visited one of his favorite spots in southeast Minnesota Friday for his final “weather bump,” the video clips that play before going to commercial break. He shot video of the “Hope” sign off I-35. It is a message he wants to leave for the community as he embarks on retirement.

The “Hope” exit sign off I-35(Chuck Sibley)

Chuck joined the station as a part-time Studio Camera Operator for then KROC-TV, now KTTC, on August 1, 1972. Chuck graduated earlier that year from Lourdes High School. In 1977, he started as a news photographer; a job he’s held ever since.

During his five decades-plus with KTTC, Chuck has made his mark on many stories and many people.

“It’s truly been an honor and a privilege to work with so many great people while covering news, sports and weather,” Chuck said. “Truly an honor and a privilege.”

Chuck has covered the Super Bowl, U.S. Open, Final Four, and the World Series twice. There also hasn’t been a significant high school sports tournament or championship that Chuck hasn’t been on the sidelines for.

Chuck has many top moments behind the lens, but one at the top is a story on the Viola Gopher Count. In the early 2000s, Chuck and reporter Jason Wenisch profiled an 85-year-old man who had trapped more than 15,000 gophers for the annual count. He was known as the “King of Gophers.” Chuck shows this story to every new employee and intern on their first day.

Chuck has won numerous awards for his work from the Minnesota Associated Press Broadcasters, the Minnesota chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, the Rochester Area Officials Association, the Midwest Broadcast Journalists Association, and regional Emmys. He was inducted the Gold Circle at the Upper Midwest Emmys in 2022.

For more on Chuck’s lengthy career, visit this story.

Find stories like this and more, in our apps.

Photographer arrested on suspicion of trespassing near Rio Grande Gorge Bridge

Photographer arrested on suspicion of trespassing near Rio Grande Gorge Bridge
image

TAOS — Photographer Raul Velderrain spent two months planning the perfect shot: He would spend two hours climbing to a spot in the Rio Grande Gorge and then 20 seconds with an open shutter to capture the Milky Way as it loomed behind the gorge bridge.

What he didn’t plan to do was spend 28 hours in jail on a count of trespassing.

“It was worth it,” Velderrain told The Taos News, “because I got to see my vision and my art come to fruition.”

Add atmosphere back into your landscapes with fog in Lightroom

Add atmosphere back into your landscapes with fog in Lightroom
Unlocking the atmosphere in landscape photos with haze

One of the biggest challenges of landscape photography is having the camera see what your eyes do. Our eyes are much more sensitive to certain changes in light than cameras. We see subtle variations in tone that the camera just doesn’t pick up.

This means environments can appear a little more drab than we’d hoped. In this video, Mark Denney walks us through how we can get some of that atmosphere back. It’s a great technique, and you don’t even have to leave Lightroom.

YouTube video
[embedded content]

Adding back the atmosphere

We’ve all been somewhere before where everything just seemed to come together. The light, the shadows, the clouds, the separation of depth from the haze. We bring up our camera to get a shot and it just completely loses the haze.

Trying to bring that back in the edit can be a challenge. It used to be extremely difficult to do in the early days of digital photography. Photoshop was kind of primitive, and Lightroom didn’t even exist yet. Aside from the lack of tools, the biggest issue back then was that the same techniques didn’t always work on all images.

That is still true today, as Mark mentions early on in the video. Every scene is different, and every scene is lit differently. So, he shows several different techniques for adding a hazy atmosphere back into your photos. And being done in Lightroom, the edits are completely non-destructive.

On a side note, I do find it quite amusing to see tutorials like this while also seeing tutorials about reducing the haze and how to make your colours pop.

Cairo youth photographs the Eclipse

Cairo youth photographs the Eclipse

#inform-video-player-1 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

#inform-video-player-2 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

CAIRO — Nine-year-old budding astronomer Seth Lynch traveled to Williford, Arkansas, to view the solar eclipse with his dad Jonathan, mom Kendra, and siblings Hannah, Caleb, and Sarah, plus grandmother, uncles, aunts, and cousins: eighteen in all.

Lynch and astronomer Randy Rhea met when he attended a partial eclipse viewing last October at the Pebble Hill Learning Center, and have been in contact since then. Santa brought Lynch a Celestron NexStar 130SLT telescope, and Lynch has been honing his astrophotography skills. He took this photograph of the eclipse at totality while mom followed his instructions on how to track the Sun with the hand controller. Lynch’s mom wrote Rhea: “Seth got after me when I was getting behind. Words, and even pictures, cannot do justice to the beauty and majesty of the experience. The eclipse even tricked the streetlights during totality. One scientist came all the way from Taiwan to view totality.”



Seth Lynch

BEHIND THE TELESCOPE: Seth Lynch at his telescope during the eclipse.




Notice the “cloud” around the Sun in Lynch’s photograph. At totality, the Moon covers the entire bright surface of the Sun, and the Sun’s atmosphere (corona) becomes visible. The Sun’s corona is actually much hotter than the solar surface, which is why the corona is white (white hot) rather than yellow. However, the corona is tenuous and therefore dimmer than the Sun’s surface. Coronal material is ejected by the Sun and travels millions of miles into space as it dissipates into the solar wind. It is this solar wind that pushes a comet’s tail away from the Sun. Seth’s photograph also reveals the filamentary nature of the corona.

Photographs of the total eclipse taken with cell phones show the corona. However, Lynch’s photograph also shows solar prominences. Solar prominences are large loops of plasma (atoms and electrons stripped of their bond). Prominences are anchored to the surface but loop around strong magnetic fields, rising hundreds of thousands of miles from the Sun.

Prominences rise above sunspots. Lynch’s photograph of the eclipse before totality shows sunspots. During periods of heavy solar activity, if you have keen eyes, you can see sunspots using only the safety glasses you used for the eclipse. Sunspots appear as very small speckles of black on the Sun. A telescope with a solar filter reveals larger spots in more detail, often in groups.

Before the eclipse, Rhea saw a headline “Your map of the path of totality is wrong, experts say.” This type of half-truth news prevails in media’s click-grabbing coverage of science today. The Sun is a ball of seething gas, so its exact “surface” is somewhat variable. This results in an uncertainty of a few seconds in the length of totality. Turn that idea into the “path is wrong” and media gets more clicks.

Where can you get accurate coverage of astronomy. Right here in the Times-Enterprise, of course. Or ask Lynch.

#inform-video-player-3 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

Visionary Women Photographers Collide in Unexpected Museum Show

Visionary Women Photographers Collide in Unexpected Museum Show

The work of photographer Francesca Woodman is having a moment, being the subject of both an exhibition at Gagosian in New York and a must-see museum show at the National Portrait Gallery in London. Though her name is reaching new heights of world renown, the young New York photographer has been a critical darling for decades and her works, produced before her tragically early death in 1981 at the age of just 22, have an enduring sense of style and experimental daring.

This timeless appeal is inevitably foregrounded throughout the impressively original London exhibition, which weaves her works with those of another celebrated historical photographer active a whole century earlier, Julia Margaret Cameron. A careful curatorial eye brings to the fore striking comparisons in which a similar subject matter is approached with mastery, mystery, and invention by the artist, while still very much bearing the essence of their respective eras. Each of these unique talents could, of course, have easily merited an exhibition of their own, yet this pairing does not constrain them.

Born in Calcutta in 1815, Cameron enjoyed a privileged Victorian upbringing due to her father’s involvement with the colonial East India Company. She and her sisters were known to be outspoken and unconventional, but it wasn’t until Cameron moved to London with her husband in 1845 that she became a member of artistic circles.

a collage of two photographs each of a young woman from the waist up with her head turned in profile and long hair spilling back

From left to right: Julia Margaret Cameron, The Dream (Mary Hillier) (1869). Courtesy of the Wilson Centre for Photography. Francesca Woodman, Untitled (1979). Courtesy of the Woodman Family Foundation, © Woodman Family Foundation/DACS London.

Cameron learned about the invention of photography in 1839, while still in her twenties, and first saw a daguerreotype in 1842. Yet she didn’t take up the practice herself until the age of 48, having been given a camera as a present by her daughter. In the last 12 years of Cameron’s life, until her death in 1879, she produced some 900 photographs that evince a highly exploratory approach to the fledgling art form.

Fast forward 100 years and photography had exploded in popularity, replacing writing as the most ubiquitous means of documenting of daily life. Like Cameron, Woodman received her first camera as a gift from her father. She trained formally at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) with stints spent in Rome before moving to New York in 1979 to make it as a photographer. Woodman was highly ambitious and quickly became devastated by what she perceived as a lack of immediate success.

a collage of two images side by side, on the left a faded face appears, on the left we see a woman's body in an interior space but it's very blurred

From left to right: Julia Margaret Cameron, The South West Wind (1864). © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Francesca Woodman, House #3 (1976).Courtesy of the Woodman Family Foundation, © Woodman Family Foundation/DACS London.

The works of both photographers are roughly grouped according to themes of portraiture, otherworldly or dreamlike states, classical references, mythology, and the natural world, all of which reveal interesting affinities and departures in terms of staging, costume, focus, and style. Each artist has such clarity of vision that any differences in what could be achieved technically in their respective centuries feel mostly irrelevant.

Illusionistic effects that push photography beyond the status of a mere record are employed by both, as in the ghostly apparitions that haunt Cameron’s The South West Wind (1864) and Woodman’s House #3 (1976). Both artists seemed to have an instinct for capturing a partial truth and letting ambiguity and the viewer’s imagination fill in the bigger picture.

a collage of two images, on the left a small child looks straight at us wearing angel wings, in the right an adult female figure jumps up with wing-like sheets flowing off her back

From left to right: Julia Margaret Cameron, I Wait (Rachel Gurney) (1872). Photo: The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles. Francesca Woodman, Untitled from the “Angels” series (1977). Courtesy of the Woodman Family Foundation, © Woodman Family Foundation/DACS London.

Cameron often photographed close friends and family while Woodman, with a more modern notion of the artist available to her, usually made art using her own body. Either way, each took as a subject what was immediately available to her but imbued it with greater resonance, playing with fantastical elements or mythological allegories. In one nearly supernatural Untitled work from Woodman’s “Angel” series, the artist could almost be said to levitate.

As the National Portrait Gallery’s wall texts point out, angels have long been seen as able “to move between spiritual and earthly realms, the conscious and unconscious, and are often encountered in dreams or visions.”

Cameron’s great-niece Rachel was once instructed to adopt poses inspired by the putti from Renaissance paintings. She later called having “a pair of heavy swan’s wings fastened to her narrow shoulders[…] No wonder those old photographs of us, leaning over imaginary ramparts of heaven, look anxious and wistful. This is how we felt, for we never knew what Aunt Julia was going to do next.”

a collage of two photographs, on the left an older man with a haggard and shocked expression, on the right a young woman posing with a young man in a leather jacket

From left to right: Julia Margaret Cameron, The Astronomer (Sir John Frederick William Herschel) (1867). Courtesy of the RISD Museum, Providence, R.I. Francesca Woodman, These People Live in That Door (1976-77). Courtesy of the Woodman Family Foundation, © Woodman Family Foundation/DACS London.

Sometimes, both Cameron and Woodman made straightforward portraits of the people in their lives. Woodman’s close friend Sloan Rankin and a one-time boyfriend, Benjamin Moore, appear in many photographs from the late 1970s. Alongside fond Pre-Raphaelite studies of muses and friends like Julia Jackson, Cameron turned her lens on some of the most important luminaries of her age like the scientist Charles Darwin, astronomer John Frederick William Herschel, the poet Alfred Tennyson, and the writer William Michael Rossetti. These animated character studies feel astonishingly ahead of their time.

Thinking back on the many double-act shows that had more ambition than bite, rarely does this curatorial conceit deserve to be as self-satisfied as here. How can a kinship be found in the oeuvres of two artists who evolved from such starkly different contexts? Rather than getting too caught up in a specific time or place—Victorian-era London or 1970s New York—the comparison pushes us instead towards more expansive interpretations that show already well-defined practices in a new light.

“Francesca Woodman and Julia Margaret Cameron: Portraits to Dream In” is on view at the National Portrait Gallery in London until June 16, 2024. 

Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.

‘Fragments’ features Brentwood photography in Duncan

‘Fragments’ features Brentwood photography in Duncan

Brentwood College School students are offering “Fragments” in a photography show in Duncan starting May 5.

The exhibition is their annual student-organized show of photographs that highlight the culmination of senior students’ growth through the photography program, “promising a captivating display of talent and creativity.”

The show’s opening reception will take place on Sunday, May 5, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Just Jakes Restaurant (45 Craig St.) and will remain on display until June 1, providing ample opportunities for art enthusiasts to not only view the creative works captured by these emerging artists, but also to purchase one to take home.

“When attendees purchase student artworks, they are not only taking home a beautiful image to hang, they are also supporting an aspiring artist’s creative journey,’ said a press release for the show.

“Since it first began nearly two decades ago, the Fine Art Photography 12 annual art show has served as an opportunity to display the remarkable talent and growth that is nurtured behind the doors of Brentwood College School’s photography program,” said the release. This year marks the 19th installment of this showcase, underscoring the commitment to fostering artistic expression by both Brentwood, and more specifically, the school’s photography instructor Paul Fletcher.

“I am very pleased with this year’s Grade 12 Fine Art Photography students’ selection of artworks and the effort they have collectively put into this year’s show,” said Fletcher. “I am very thankful to Liz and Lance of Just Jakes Restaurant for all the years my photography students have hosted this show on their premises.”

The Classic Cool of Paul McCartney as a Photographer

The Classic Cool of Paul McCartney as a Photographer
Spread the love

This title is one that I truly never thought I’d type: but Curator Catherine Futter and the Brooklyn Museum have done what many might deem impossible. They’ve taken the work of someone not considered a traditional photographer and given it the specular highlights it needs to shine. If Paul’s photography were the sun, you wouldn’t mind going blind staring at it. The images are a testament to the pillar of documentary photography that advocates for people skills, access, and being emotionally in tune with what’s around you.

Paul McCartney Photographs 1963–64: Eyes of the Storm will be on display at the Brooklyn Museum until August 18th, 2024. Please visit their website for more information.

Paul McCartney Photographs: The Exhibit

To recap what so many of you know, I’m low-vision (formerly called legally blind, but that definition has changed.) So, if you wear transition lenses, I strongly encourage you to let your glasses adjust to the inside of the Brooklyn Museum. Paul McCartney Photographs takes up the entire floor, and there are no windows on said floor. If you don’t let them adjust, some rooms might seem much darker than they really are. Part of this is due to the lighting and how bold the wall paint is.

Let’s start there: the lighting on the prints is best appreciated with fewer people in the gallery space. At times, you’ll see reflections, but they’re largely kept down to a minimum. To truly appreciate the work with minimal reflections, however, you must sometimes stand far away from the prints. That’s something that can only be done with fewer people in the space. If you’re reading this, keep that in mind.

The Prints

While the prints have their own spotlight, I truly wish that the text had the same care and appreciation given to it. Some of the text is written in bright, contrasting text with copious amounts of light. While at other times, the text seems almost like an afterthought. The experience forces you to move very often throughout the exhibit to really appreciate what’s in front of you.

Indeed, what’s in front of you is a time capsule. These images were shot by Paul over the years as the band toured and went about daily life. Insights are provided into what he shot, why he shot it, and some of the little details in between. There’s a whole section where Paul switches from black and white to color. While doing this, the color images look just as timeless as all the black and white photographs do. And here is where you really want to get close: the details are masterfully printed. You can see things like blemishes on the faces of each individual member of the Beatles — reminding you that these are candid photographs made by a man who had immense trust in them.

This fact, in and of itself, is one of the most important things here. Paul demonstrated that he was a photographer more than capable of capturing emotional moments. But he also had access that many others didn’t. I know several influencers who would probably say things like “I could’ve shot this, why isn’t my work in a museum?” The honest truth is that Paul shot from a place of emotional memory capture — not from a place of pleasing an algorithm.

It speaks to the importance of people skills — something which is truly lacking in much of photography. I adore the fact that the Brooklyn Museum is putting photographers with people skills in the spotlight. Previously, they gave quite a bit of space to Jamel Shabazz. Preceding that, the Museum did an incredible job with Garry Winogrand’s photographs. It’s so important in a world where AI is seeping through the cracks and people are relating photography to an attention-based economy over one based on authenticity.

The Third Sense

S

The exhibit is akin to accomplishing what good cinema does — it converses with your eyes and ears. With that said, it misses the stimulation of the third sense, touch — which so many use often in the world of smartphones. The addition of several copies of the book for which this exhibit is named for is missing. Paired with the right lighting, this would’ve made the exhibit all that much better. However, you can pick the book up from Amazon.

Growing up listening to punk rock and currently sporting a mohawk at age 37, I could never get into the Beatles — though I acknowledge their impact on culture and applaud them as artists. Despite this, I can look past that and nod my head to Paul’s photography abilities. If you’re a photographer who does work revolving around people, you should really go see this exhibit.