Shadow-Mimicking Photography Boards

Shadow-Mimicking Photography Boards

V-Flat World, a prominent North American producer of v-flats, introduces an innovative product line named Shadow Boards, taking an innovative step beyond traditional lighting modifiers.

Dubbed “gobos” (short for go-betweens), these boards are strategically crafted to replicate the natural aesthetic and color of sunlight streaming through windows, enhancing the visual appeal of food and product photography. Acting as objects between the light source and the subject, these Shadow Boards are meticulously designed for use in the studio, adding a touch of realism.

Available for individual purchase at $25 each or in curated sets of three for $60, the Shadow Boards are now accessible directly from V-Flat World, offering photographers a versatile tool for elevating still-life images.

Image Credit: V-Flat World

Share the cutest photo you’ve ever taken

Share the cutest photo you’ve ever taken
image

Cute, a new exhibition exploring the cuteness in contemporary culture, will be opening in London later this month.

We would like you to submit your photos of the cutest thing you’ve ever seen. Please tell us what it is, why you think it’s so cute, and when you took the photo.

Chris Hoare photographs the fissure between Bristol’s centre and its forgotten fringes

Chris Hoare photographs the fissure between Bristol’s centre and its forgotten fringes

Though there was one particular event that spurred Seven Hills, the toppling of Edward Colston’s statue in June 2020, during the Black Lives Matter protests. “It was a reminder of the significance of making work in a place that I call home,” Chris says. “Bristol is historically a globally important city, due to its maritime history, which is as much tied to its pivotal role in the slave trade.” This event also ties to the series theme of myth-making. In the wake of the slave trade, how was it that Colston had been turned into a supposed philanthropist, with significant buildings, schools and statues all named in his honour?

Of all of the images in the series – pensive, golden-lit portraits, a fresh litter of puppies, huddled together, a lone gravestone by a tree, a young girl in Harry Potter pyjamas, resting on a family member’s arm – Chris draws our attention to one of two boys on a moped, taken near Cribbs Causeway, a shopping district in the far north of Bristol. “I went there to photograph kids hanging out with their cars, not really sure what to expect and wasn’t really being taken by much when I was there,” says Chris. “Until suddenly two lads rode in on what was clearly a stolen motorbike, they came speeding through into the car park, drove in between the cars at a fast pace burning out the tyres at the same time – everyone stopped and watched disapprovingly.” As the kids came past Chris he managed to stop them briefly, capturing a portrait, before they skidded off dramatically to the sound of sirens. “It was the brazen nature of what they did that stood out,” Chris says.

Seven Hills is a publication that feels like a “milestone” for Chris. “I’m proud of having finalised a book which expresses some of what I feel about my hometown,” he says. When people encounter it, he hopes to appreciate the aesthetic nature of the work, while also contemplating the message, using it as a medium for thought. Though the publication doesn’t mark the end for Chris, in fact it marks a start; the start of the photographer delving further into the themes so powerfully raised in this beautiful study.

Seven Hills is now available to purchase from RPB Photobooks.

Photography exhibition celebrates Frick Park in the midst and wake of COVID-19

Photography exhibition celebrates Frick Park in the midst and wake of COVID-19
image

The Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy will host a three-month exhibition at the Frick Environmental Center featuring the photography of Squirrel Hill resident and artist Brian Cohen.

The show is titled “Refugium,” which means “an area in which a population of organisms can survive through a period of unfavorable conditions.”

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Cohen explained, Frick Park became a refuge for him and many people. He said he became acquainted with the park in unanticipated ways.

“We walked and ran the trails in greater numbers, dodging and weaving between masked strangers,” Cohen recalled.

“Yoga classes and religious services were held in the meadows. The off-leash area became crowded with COVID puppies and their humans.

“It was an escape. It was a safe place. It was a place to be able to take a deep breath,” Cohen said.

“And that’s what this exhibit is, both an acknowledgment of that, and a way of saying thank you to all of the people who make that place possible.”

The exhibition features photos Cohen captured on his frequent Frick Park visits between 2020 and 2023. The London native resisted the oversimplification of “landscape photography” as a gallery description, but admitted the exhibition will be a departure from his typical artistic ventures, which heavily feature contemporary portraiture.

“This is the first genuinely, full-throttle landscape project that I have ever done, and that was lovely, and it enabled me to unashamedly channel some of my favorite photographers in the process,” Cohen said, pointing to artists like Andre Kertesz, Margaret Bourke-White, Gordon Parks, and Elliott Porter.

The exhibition kicks off Thursday, Jan. 25, with an opening night celebration from 6–8 p.m.

Fairs, auction houses and AI: five predictions for the art market in 2024

Fairs, auction houses and AI: five predictions for the art market in 2024

For nearly a decade, I’ve begun each year by making predictions about the art market in January that can be objectively evaluated come December. Although I end up being wrong more often than right, reasoning my way to a set of medium-term conclusions tends to unearth some thought-provoking aspects of important recent trends. Continuing the exercise feels especially fraught after the market correction of 2023, but here we go anyway.

1. Worldwide fine art sales at auction in 2024 will land within 4% of the equivalent total in 2023

Get ready for another year of hand-wringing, as the sharp turnaround the trade has been hoping for since early last year fails to materialise, largely due to unfavourable macroeconomic conditions.

Historically aggressive interest rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve over a 16-month stretch ending last July have tamped down inflation in the US, from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 to 3.1% in November 2023. But even after the three rate reductions the Fed forecast for this year, its prime lending rate would still be 4.6%—steeper than at any point between 2009 and this latest campaign of rises. The UK and European Union’s central banks both kept their high rates steady in December, with the latter refusing to even hint at future cuts. This means borrowing money will stay expensive in these regions in 2024, limiting the capital reserves of the collecting (and speculating) class.

Meanwhile, China’s economy continues to look shaky amid its ongoing crisis in the market for real estate, with no strong reason to believe it will right itself soon. And numerous economists anticipate the UK will grow less than 1% in 2024.

I can’t see global fine art sales under the hammer improving by more than 4% year-on-year without a strong rebound from at least two of the perennial top three national markets (the US, China and the UK). That doesn’t mean sales won’t modestly increase, just that they won’t surge by an attitude-resetting amount.

2. At least one blue-chip artist will split with a gallery over fallout from the Israel-Hamas war

As of mid-December, the most divisive geopolitical conflict in recent memory had already led to several ruptures in the art trade: reports of various collectors threatening to return, auction or even literally burn works by artists in their collections deemed to be stridently pro-Palestine; Lisson Gallery’s indefinite postponement of an Ai Weiwei show scheduled to open last November after a (since-deleted) social media post by the artist implied an anti-Arab bias in US policy and media coverage; and Australia’s Anna Schwartz Gallery dropping the artist Mike Parr over his performance work that reportedly invoked “apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing” in regard to Israel’s political and military strategy in Gaza.

The effects in art’s institutional and publishing realms have included firings, resignations and departures by alleged mutual agreement, exhibition cancellations and removals of works from exhibitions in protest. There are very few higher-stakes fractures left for tensions over the conflict to induce: the dismissal or resignation of a museum director, the severing of a corporate partnership with an art institution and the breakup of a blue-chip artist and one of their dealers. Each of these three is on the table in 2024, but the last one seems the most likely of all to me.

3. Patrick Drahi will sell a minority stake in Sotheby’s to a private investor by 1 October

The concussive impact of higher interest rates on the debt-fuelled corporate empire of the Sotheby’s owner is the most overlooked story in the auction sector, mainly because tracking it requires a working understanding of concepts such as bond maturity rates, term loans and debt restructuring that would scarcely be any less accessible to professionals outside finance if they were explained in the runic language of druids.

But the point is that Drahi has an increasingly urgent need for cash; his companies have to repay about $21.3bn by the end of 2027 and $60bn overall, according to Bloomberg. Drahi has already sold hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of assets to narrow the gap and, as he reportedly told a roomful of potential investors about his portfolio of corporations last September, “Everything is open… it’s just a question of offer and demand”.

That should include syphoning off part of Sotheby’s for the right price. Charles Stewart, Sotheby’s chief executive, denied in December that leadership is pursuing an initial public offering of the company, and Bloomberg reported the same month that Drahi had cut ties with the two investment banks hired to pursue that goal in the US in 2021. There are only two reasons for him to do this: either he has decided to hold onto the company in full, or he has decided to prioritise private investment instead.

Option two makes much more sense, especially in light of a Financial Times report that Drahi has had informal talks about selling a minority stake in the auction house to potential investors that “included European billionaires and the Qatar Investment Authority” during the past two years. It may be true that he views Sotheby’s as a unique asset that he is reluctant to sell, even in part, but that stance also happens to be a textbook negotiating position. My guess is the gravity of Drahi’s financial situation overcomes his sentiment, and a deal in principle gets announced by the fourth quarter of the year.

4. Neither Endeavor/Frieze nor MCH Group/Art Basel will acquire any more regional art fairs

Ever since Frieze announced last July that it would acquire the Armory Show and Expo Chicago, many in the trade have been anticipating a wave of consolidation, with several more regional fairs being absorbed by the two largest organisers as rising expenses, declining sales and an abundance of options compel dealers and collectors alike to become more selective. But given how tough the business is getting for smaller organisers, my question is this: Why would the largest players want to pay to take on their problems?

Remember, MCH Group, Art Basel’s parent company, already rolled up an array of regional fairs in a vastly favourable economic climate—and regretted it quickly. From September 2016 to July 2018, MCH Group acquired majority stakes in the India Art Fair and Masterpiece London, publicised plans to launch Art SG in Singapore (in collaboration with Sandy Angus and Tim Etchells) and became a minority investor in Art Düsseldorf. By November 2018, MCH Group announced it “would not proceed” with Art SG and would divest its shares in the India Art Fair and Art Düsseldorf. Masterpiece London, the last remnant of its regional-fair investment spree, was shuttered for good in early 2023 due to “escalating costs and a decline in the number of international exhibitors”. (MCH Group did invest in Art SG in 2022, but its share is only 15%.)

Frieze’s recent acquisitions aren’t just different from MCH Group’s earlier multi-continental approach; they may be unique. The Armory Show and Expo Chicago are likely the two largest, most consequential regional fairs in the most robust art market on the planet. I’m sure Frieze or Endeavor, its parent company, could buy more regional fairs elsewhere if desired, but being part of a broad category does not make each item in it equal. Wine and sparkling water are two bottled liquids in my home, but just because they’re nice to drink doesn’t mean my laundry detergent and drain cleaner are, too.

Whether out of curiosity, pragmatism or vanity, some artist of note is going to be the first to go into business with the AI companies

Endeavor/Frieze and MCH Group/Art Basel are certainly still hunting growth in 2024. I just think their leaders believe alternatives like digital initiatives, advisory arrangements and novel partnerships (see: Frieze’s No. 9 Cork Street gallery project) are more profitable pursuits than operating even more of the same events in an oversaturated sector.

5. One or more brand-name artists will strike a licensing deal with the maker of an AI-powered image generator

Although there’s still plenty of fear about the consequences of unbridled artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of image-making, the technology has now attracted so much funding, opened the door to so much creative potential and accumulated so much power that artists in every discipline are largely reconciling themselves to co-existing with it for the rest of their lives. (At least in the US, where the will to use legislation to restrain tech in general and AI specifically lags far behind the EU.)

Whether out of curiosity, pragmatism or vanity (or a combination of all three), some artist of note is going to decide it is better to be the first to go into business with the AI companies rather than fight them, in what is probably a losing battle, to shield their work from unauthorised use as a visual reference point. The same thing has happened with just about every innovative technology since Andy Warhol partnered with Amiga computers in 1982.

Would, say, Marina Abramović or Jeff Koons shy away from cashing a cheque from OpenAI, the developer of DALL-E, when doing so could make them the artistic face of an evolution in digital image-making? I doubt it. But one way or another, we’ll know in 12 months.

How Alien We Seem: On Being Blind and Obsessed with Photography

How Alien We Seem: On Being Blind and Obsessed with Photography

I’m not sure when the blind pencil vendor entered my consciousness as a stock character in the urban landscape. All I know is that he (he seems always to be a he) has been jabbing my blind sensibilities for a long time. I do, however, remember exactly when I first encountered a blind writer identifying with him. That was in the 1999 memoir, Slackjaw, by Jim Knipfel—who is the author of many books of fiction and nonfiction, and who I and other like-minded “blindos” (blind plus weirdo) consider the patron saint of blind punks.

On the eve of Knipfel’s blind-man training, someone at work asked him “what my trainers would do to me.”

Knipfel’s answer was: “First thing, I imagine… is they’re going to give me a tin cup full of pencils and station me on the corner of Forty-seventh and Fifth, just to see how much money I can make.”

Another friend pushed the idea further. “You know what you do? You take one of those pencils, see, and jab it into people’s eyes when they stop, and say, ‘Ha! Now you can go sell pencils, too!’”

This passage made me giggle when I read it years ago, and it made me giggle again when I reread it a few weeks ago. It was the first thing I thought of when I discovered a black and white photo of a blind pencil vendor in the New York Public Library.

As a blind person who wrote a book mobilized against ocularcentrism, I was as shocked as anyone to suddenly find one day that I had become obsessed with photography—or, rather, the obsession sighted photographers have with blind subjects. And so it was that I found myself researching the many anonymous blind faces in the vast photography collection of NYPL’s Wallach Division. This is how I discovered Walter Silver’s black and white photograph of a blind pencil vendor taken in the 1950s in New York City.

As a blind person who wrote a book mobilized against ocularcentrism, I was as shocked as anyone to suddenly find one day that I had become obsessed with photography.

Silver’s blind pencil vendor features a man in a heavy coat sitting on the ledge of what appears to be a department store window. The man holds pencils in one hand and a sign written on the lid of the box that he’s holding on his lap with the words: “Blind” in big letters, and in smaller print: “Please buy a pencil. Thank you.”

After having both sighted humans and AI describe this photo to me, I decided to learn what some blind writer friends thought—I’m lucky enough to have a few very good ones! Of course, I started with Knipfel. I emailed him a description of Silver’s photo, and asked him a bunch of questions that basically boiled down to: why does the blind pencil vendor continue to resonate? Is it, like, related to low expectations? Both the low expectations most sighted people have for blind people and, more vexing still, the low expectations we newly blinded people have for ourselves?

“Yes, there’s certainly that perception that the blind are so pitiable and pathetic the only way we can make what even approaches a living is to sell pencils on street corners,” he agreed. But he noted there was something more going on. “Even though they were once a commonplace and very real phenomenon, generations after actual blind pencil salesman vanished the image remained… it became a cultural trope. The tin pencil cup was as much a signifier of blindness as a cane or dark glasses.”

One might suppose that signifier has already lost its teeth for younger generations, because, as Knipfel pointed out, “images of the blind as anything but noble and empowered are being scrubbed away.”

Yet I find the trope of the blind pencil vendor (or “BPV”) persists in depictions of blind people and in how we are treated by the sighted. The blind pencil vendor may be a thing of the past, but his presentation of blindness feels indelible. I’m nothing like him, and yet I’m mistaken for him, or, at least, something like him.

*

The blind pencil vendor was already an old story in 1890, when journalist/reformer Jacob Riis went into Lower East Side tenements with a camera and the newly discovered flash powder that allowed him to take pictures in dark places, and came out with How the Other Half Lives, a book that exposed the extreme poverty of many New Yorkers. For Riis a hundred and thirty some-odd years ago and for many of us today, the line between blind beggar and blind pencil vendor appears blurry at best.

“The blind beggar alone is winked at in New York’s streets,” wrote Riis, “because the authorities do not know what else to do with him… The annual pittance of thirty or forty dollars which he receives from the city serves to keep his landlord in good humor; for the rest his misfortune and his thin disguise of selling pencils on the street corners must provide.”

The blind pencil vendor is not really selling anything. It is a pretext for begging. A shabby disguise which fools no one. Silver’s photo clues us in to that fact: his sign announces no price; there is no sense that he will be making change for anyone. There is only the ask: “Please buy a pencil.”

I emailed Georgina Kleege, author of many books including More Than Meets the Eye: What Blindness Brings to Art, to ask her thoughts on the blind pencil vendor and why, despite (or because of?) his pitiful appearance, he feels like an easy joke.

“It must have something to do with the low value of the pencils,” she replied. “Why not sell something worth more, with more profit? Also I guess there’s the joke that he won’t know how much or how little money people are putting in his box.”

I might add: or, if people are taking money out of his box. It is not the first thing my “sighted informants” (thanks to Kleege for that term!) notice, but, there is a box to the left of the man that has a hole cut out of it. He appears to be dropping his money into that more secure place. This explains why he holds his pencils, and an empty box.

Most sighted informants find the stuff surrounding the blind pencil vendor quite eye-catching—to use a favorite sighted-people expression. To be sure, it’s a dynamic photo. On the other side of the window behind him stands a woman wearing a cloche hat, and the gathered curtains are patterned with a design that reminded one informant a little bit of Paul Klee. Most striking is the stack of newspapers bundled neatly in front of the next window over.

There’s all this interesting visible stuff surrounding the poor fellow that he doesn’t know about. It speaks to the sort of thing sighted people say to me often: It’s so sad you can’t see… the sky, this dress, how pretty you are (that was when I was younger), the spectacular fall foliage, etc.

But sighties also hit me with the opposite: it’s good you can’t see: that rat, how messy my house is, this horror or that. There seems to be an innocence attached to not-seeing that gets hung around the necks of we the blind.

The innocent ignorance of the blind is no more starkly put than in Kate Chopin’s 1897 short story “The Blind Man,” which briefly follows the ramblings of a door-to-door pencil vendor whose ignorance causes him to suffer many small discomforts but saves him from the final catastrophe. When we meet him in the heat of the day, he is walking on the sunny side of the street while everyone else is on the other side with its “trees that threw a thick and pleasant shade….But the man did not know, for he was blind, and moreover he was stupid.”

Chopin’s blind man is stupid because he does not remove his vest in the heat and trails the curb with his foot, apparently unaware that a cane (or stick) would be very useful in detecting obstacles and level changes. In other words, he is not very good at being blind.

And yet, it seems his ineptitude shields him from, first, noticing he’s almost been struck by a trolley car—which the reader/viewer is made, for an alarming moment, to believe happened. And second, continues on his way without noticing the death in his wake and the subsequent Horror “when the multitude recognized in the dead and mangled figure one of the wealthiest, most useful and most influential men of the town.”

I can’t help but notice that, in our cultural imagination, the blind pencil vendor/beggar seems always to be a man. Perhaps this is a kind of ironic inversion of the ancient blind poet/prophet (Homer/Tiresias). Perhaps too, the solo itinerant nature of the biz excludes women, who have traditionally been placed behind walls, while the blind seem always to be wandering outside them.

Andrew Leland, author of The Country of the Blind, reminded me of Chopin’s story (I had repressed it) when I hit him with my blind pencil vendor email query. He also gave me a delightfully sharp reading of it and the handy abbreviation. “The BPV is here a ridiculous, tragic, pathetic figure,” Leland replied, “but Magoo-like, he bumbles past any real harm.”

Mister Magoo is the blind cartoon character of the mid-twentieth century who traveled the most harrowing paths, never seeing (or experiencing) any of the dangers. Leland continued: “It is as though in his forsaken state, god spares him the worst accidents. He sells no pencils, but he somehow survives, hungry and bedraggled, anyway. He has no subjectivity—too stupid for that. He is all surface, pure emblem of ignorance.”

Unlike Silver’s BPV, Chopin’s does not carry a sign. He is the sign, a metaphor, a symbol less for the blind than for the presumably sighted consumer.

Unlike Silver’s BPV, Chopin’s does not carry a sign. He is the sign, a metaphor, a symbol less for the blind than for the presumably sighted consumer. The Blind Man’s inconsequence is reinforced by the worthlessness of the thing he sells. Chopin underlines this worthlessness when she reveals that someone “who had finally grown tired of having him hanging around had equipped him with this box of pencils.” And, as far as we know, he never sells a single one: “the man or maid who answered the bell needed no pencil, nor could they be induced to disturb the mistress of the house about so small a thing.”

What’s most pitiful is how hard he’s working to sell something nobody wants or needs. It seems like, across the decades, “a pencil is the most trifling of goods for sale,” as Leland put it in his email.

When I mention this to one of my sighted informants, he said, “Pencils are great! I love pencils. We should go to that pencil store I told you about, get a photo of you in there!”

That particular informant is my sighted partner, Alabaster Rhumb. Pencil enthusiast. He is not alone. At Graphite Confidential, a website that chronicles “American history, one pencil at a time,” I read a brief article about how a blind organization reclaimed the BPV with images of blind children urging “mayors, socialites and everyday New Yorkers” to buy pencils stamped with “To Aid N.Y. Guild For The Jewish Blind.”

*

Stephen Kuusisto (author of Planet of the Blind and many other books of poetry and prose) finds the sign of the BPV to be a kind of stand-in for autobiography—or perhaps a barrier to it. “His appearance on the ordinary street is founded on the principle of auto-graphein,” writes Kuusisto in a lyric essay that accompanies his poem, ‘To the Pencil Seller.” “Surely he cannot write his life?” thinks the sighted passersby. “We shall buy his pencils.’

There’s something particularly degrading about the blind pencil vendor. He is selling cheap items, but more specifically, these are cheap inaccessible items. A sighted person fallen on hard times might take that hair’s-breath step up from panhandling to selling pencils, but he could—should he fail to sell them all—use one to make a note. A list perhaps of other, more lucrative, career paths. But the blind man can make no use of the pencil–except as a weapon à la Shakespeare’s archvillain in King Lear: “Out vile jelly!”

Kuusisto is provoked, ‘after long deliberation,” to write a poem in which the BPV talks back, with mystery and eloquence:

The blind man is amaranth, a man-word of sorts,
A word that will be mistaken on earth.
Still I
Saluted the closed world
Without its consent,
Cross the water of streets
And raised a sign
Unreadable as the moon.

Yes. We are human-made-word in the eyes of so many sighted. We are inscribed with meaning: blind poet/prophet, blind saint, blind beggar….And this amaranth, life-giving sacred grain, symbol of immortality. Hence death. With its red-petaled flowers that never fade. We are inscribed BPV and I, with letters we are presumably not able to read, letters that stretch from ancient times to now.

*

The endurance of the trope was made apparent to me one day on the New York City subway. I was sitting on the N Train with my guide dog, heading to NYU from Astoria. A man came up to me and was confused when he found that the lid of my Dunkin Donuts coffee was in place. Nowhere to shove his dollar. “Oh,” he said. “I thought….Here’s a dollar.”

“Um, what?” I was baffled. Then I wasn’t. All I could do to deflect the insult was laugh in his face.

The confusion many sighted people show upon learning that I use the very same iPhones and computers they do reveals, time and time again, how alien we seem to them.

In The Metanarrative of Blindness, Disability Studies professor David Bolt describes an eerily similar experience. While waiting for his friend outside of a bar, a stranger tried to hand Bolt something. Thinking it was an inaccessible flyer of some kind, he did not put his hand up to accept—his “standard little expression of protest.” The man “seemed perplexed,” and paused “before asking if I was not collecting for the blind. At that point, though not in a can or a hat, a proverbial penny dropped for us both.”

When we are mistaken for blind beggars, it’s hard not to feel like our presence in the sighted world is being “implicitly explained by a cultural construct,” concludes Bolt.

To be sure, things have changed rapidly since the BPV haunted our streets. The digital era has a lot to do with this. We have access to books and information and tools of communication previous blind generations could not have imagined.

Yet attitudes towards blindness have not changed much since the days of Riis and Chopin. The confusion many sighted people show upon learning that I use the very same iPhones and computers they do—just tricked out with text-to-speech and a Braille display—reveals, time and time again, how alien we seem to them. Many sighted people ‘assume that blind people were just dropped out of the sky without any prior knowledge of the environment,” as Kleege put it. Such people are startled to find us in their midst.

After a Brooklyn barbecue last summer, I heard from the host that when my blind friend, I, and our sighted partners left, someone who didn’t know us said with surprise, “How do you know not just one but two blind people?”

This otherwise educated and hip human still fancies us as the other half, sitting on the margins of civilization with a tin cup, a sign, and some old-school (if sometimes fetishized) and inaccessible writing implements.

Enter the stock character riddling the blind landscape. They are the ignorant sighted person who remains blissfully, stubbornly unaware of the fact that such remarks make us want to poke them in the eye. But the accessible computer is mightier than the sharpened pencil. I content myself, with this brief sketch, in the hopes that they will recognize themselves, reach deep into their pockets, and produce change.

M. Leona Godin

Lithuanian Art Market Expert Ornela Ramasauskaite – Among the Leaders in Global Art Investment

Lithuanian Art Market Expert Ornela Ramasauskaite –  Among the Leaders in Global Art Investment
Ornela Ramasauskaite artxchange global by Egle Senderoviene

Ornela Ramasauskaite artxchange global by Egle Senderoviene

Ornela Ramasauskaite artxchange global

Ornela Ramasauskaite artxchange global 2024

artXchange Global logo

artXchange Global logo

Lithuanian art market expert earns global recognition. Ms Ornela Ramasauskaite, the founder of “artXchange Global”, is awarded for art wealth management.

VILNIUS, LITHUANIA, January 4, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ — Lithuanian Art Market Expert Ornela Ramasauskaite – Among the Leaders in Global Art Investment

Even though Lithuania is a small country, its artists are recognized worldwide. In addition to artists, niche representatives such as Lithuanian art market expert and art investment consultant Ornela Ramašauskaitė is acknowledged as leaders globally. She was honoured with the “Leading Female Figure in Art Wealth Management” award at the “Wealth & Finance Awards 2023,” and her company, “artXchange Global,” received the “Art Investment Strategist of the Year – Europe” award at the “LUX Global Excellence Awards 2023.”

These awards place Lithuania on the art market map, connecting culture with economics and going beyond aesthetics. The global art market impresses with impressive art sales, and art investment competes with the S&P 500 stock index returns. While the works of Lithuanian creators are not yet widely considered global investment opportunities, art experts can draw attention to authors from this exotic country.

“It’s an honour to be recognized in international awards. The art market is very niche; everyone knows each other, relying heavily on reputation, scrutinized meticulously. However, awards provide visibility among the mass audience – part of my mission is to demystify art investment, showing that it’s an accessible option even for average-income individuals. Secondly, I want to attract the attention of corporations – it’s rare in our region for them to have their art collections,” says O. Ramasauskaite. Her expertise extends beyond asset management consultations; she also works with creative industries and technology in the cultural sector.

“I’ve been in the art market for almost two decades – during my UNESCO cultural management and cultural policy studies, I worked at art auction houses, served as an expert in the Council of Europe’s cultural policy monitoring project, and worked on managing art collections. I quickly realized that my field of work is the entire world, allowing me to choose interesting projects. I became an ambassador for the Amedeo Modigliani Foundation (Italy), rescued one Dubai bank with NFTs, talked at several international creative industries conferences, joined the CultTech association as a mentor and advisor for investors in art and technology startups, evaluated applications for the large cultural project Zmina: Rebuilding (Ukraine), helped lots of artists and galleries with marketing. In my doctoral studies, I delve into the impact of artificial intelligence on the art market and manipulations in shaping the prices of artworks. I have several prominent collectors with whom we gradually build amazing collections without compromising on quality. All my partners know I don’t favour specific galleries; I always remain objective, focusing on methodologies and indices. In other words, I’m in a new place each time, and I already consider Istanbul airport my second home,” O. Ramašauskaitė laughs.

The art expert is pleased that Lithuanians are increasingly recognized in the global art business – more and more young people choose international studies related to cultural economics, politics, or management, work in prestigious institutions, and specialize in narrow fields such as taxation. In the Baltics, interest in art is also growing, collectors are emerging, and a tradition of attending art exhibitions is being born. “It’s exciting to observe the careers of several artists – there’s a good chance that we will soon have globally renowned names whose works will be sought after by prestigious museums and serious collectors,” says the director of the “artXchange Global” art market agency.

Ornela Ramasauskaite
artXchange Global
+370 61262965
ornela@artxchange.global
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
LinkedIn

image

Mirrorless Cameras: A New Era in Photography

Mirrorless Cameras: A New Era in Photography

Mirrorless Cameras: A New Era in Photography

Photography finds a new face as mirrorless cameras gain popularity, offering a blend of advanced imaging technology and compact design. This year, leading brands are enticing customers with attractive deals on top mirrorless camera models, such as the Nikon Z50, Sony Alpha ILCE-6100Y, Sony Alpha ZV-E10L, Sony Alpha ILCE-6400M, Sony Alpha ILCE 6100L, Panasonic LUMIX G7, and Canon’s EOS R10. These models are lauded for their high-resolution sensors, sophisticated autofocus systems, and 4K video recording capabilities.

Evolution in the Field of Photography

Once dominated by bulky DSLRs, the field of photography has seen a paradigm shift with the arrival of mirrorless cameras. These gadgets provide high-quality images without the associated heaviness, catering to various photography styles, from landscape and sports to portraits. They have become particularly popular among travelers and content creators, attributable to their lightweight and compact nature. The standout model in this category is the Sony Alpha ILCE-6100Y, which has secured its position with its high versatility and performance.

Making the Suitable Choice

When selecting a mirrorless camera, potential buyers should consider several factors such as sensor size, autofocus capability, video features, lens compatibility, and user interface. Of course, budget plays a significant role in the final decision. Mirrorless cameras offer benefits over DSLRs such as size, speed, and video quality, making them a suitable choice for photographers at all levels, from beginners to professionals.

Noteworthy Models

Among the notable models in this category, the Fujifilm GFX100 II Mirrorless Medium Format Camera Body deserves special mention. This device offers a new 102-megapixel large-format sensor, IBIS with up to 8 stops of stabilization, AI-developed autofocus, and advanced video features. It also provides a blackout-free 5.3fps burst and a 9.44 million dot EVF for an optimal viewing experience. With discounts reaching up to 23%, leading brands continue to offer irresistible deals on these cutting-edge mirrorless camera models.