Over the Span of Two Years, Amanda Large of doublespace photography Documents Uno Prii’s Modernist Toronto Apartment Buildings

Over the Span of Two Years, Amanda Large of doublespace photography Documents Uno Prii’s Modernist Toronto Apartment Buildings

Project of the Week

Uno Prii – an Estonian-Canadian architect – would have turned 100 this year. Known for his use of bold geometric forms, Prii designed many modernist apartment buildings across Toronto in the 1960s and ’70s.

“This series features select images from ten of Uno Prii’s Toronto apartment buildings, just a small slice of his legacy,” explains Amanda Large of doublespace photography. Amanda took on photographing Prii’s buildings over the span of two years.

44 Walmer Road

Amanda’s photographs of Prii’s apartments are displayed in black and white – distilled down to the architecture’s essence – light and forms.

11 Walmer Road

“I wanted to photograph the buildings in similar conditions – in sunlight, near the edges of the day,” tells Amanda.

35 Walmer Road

I appreciate how Amanda shows Prii’s work off in context. Dark foregrounds draw our eyes in toward the apartment buildings. We see them among construction, traffic, framed by foliage, and from the sidewalk a few streets over. She immerses us in the landscapes surrounding Prii’s apartments, and we feel as if we are viewing them in real life, right on the street.

300 Eglinton Ave E

Amanda also makes more abstract vignettes of Prii’s buildings, like in this shot of the apartment at 300 Eglinton Avenue East below. The repetitive forms and punchy contrast give off a fine art feel. We see just a slice of Prii’s structure, but get a sense of the whole thing.

300 Eglinton Ave E

Again, dark foregrounds create vignettes that draw our eye into the frame. Amanda carefully places the buildings between the tree leaves and amid the nearby homes, leading our gaze while providing a bit of context.

485 Huron S

The well-timed lighting creates long, sharp shadows which convey a sense of time and place while chiseling out the forms that Prii is so well known for.

50 Stephanie St

Amanda speaks on her approach to portraying the apartment buildings. She shares, “When there was furniture or tchotchkes on the balconies, or electrical wires in the frame, I tried to resist the urge to digitally remove them. Buildings are made to be lived in, and electrical wires are part of dense urban settings”

100 Spadina Road

“Eight of the ten buildings were photographed in fall/winter for better quality of light. Two buildings – 141 Erskine and 425 Ave Rd – are north-facing, so they had to be photographed in mid-summer as that is the only time the sun made it around to the main façades,” explains Amanda.

425 Ave Road
20 Prince Arthur Ave
141 Erskine Ave

“It’s hard to choose a favourite from the series – I shot, edited and culled this series so that the images work together as a unified set with no ‘hero’ shots. If I were showing only 10 shots from the body of work, I’d have likely selected different images than these. But the last image is one of my favourites.

Anyone who knows me, knows I’m not about the wide shots that show the entire building. I think this detail shot encapsulates two of the major design features of 141 Erskine; the classic Uno Prii white concrete swooping canopy entrance, and the two different balcony treatments. I intentionally went on a beautiful summer evening so the sun would reach just around to the north side of the building by sunset, and the play of the light on the main façade is really lovely.

One of the challenges of shooting older buildings can be mature trees obscuring the façades, but in this case I was able to use the tree canopy and shadow to make a natural vignette for the frame, drawing the eye to the subject.”

141 Erskine Ave

A massive thank you to Amanda Large for submitting this personal project in to us!

Make sure you pop by doublespace’s website and give them a follow on Instagram @2spacephoto to drool over more of Amanda’s (and Younes’s) work!

If you have a project you’d like to be considered for Project of the Week, you can submit it here.

Why Your Photography May Be Harmful and What You Can Do About It. |

Why Your Photography May Be Harmful and What You Can Do About It. |

Many of us don’t consider the harm we do with our photos. Our actions might be innocent, but there’s a dark side to most genres that we don’t ever consider.

The Problem With Wedding Photography

A book sitting on the shelves above my desk is about wedding photography. It starts by saying that wedding photographers were once considered bottom feeders. It then points out that things have changed significantly over the last couple of decades as documentary-style photography has taken over from the “look-at-the-birdy-and-say-cheese” group photos that plagued the genre for most of its history.

This new style of wedding photography has certainly caused some upset among the clergy here in the UK, and I suspect elsewhere too. Wedding photographers seem to think their work is more important than the wedding. A retired vicar friend of mine told me that he was marrying a couple when, during the vows, he heard a noise. Looking behind him, he saw the photographer climbing onto the altar. Recent news stories here have reported the feud between priests and wedding photographers, with the photographers saying they should be shown more respect and not pushed to the back of the church where they are sometimes sent, and priests pointing out that their job is the most important.

I’ll have to say, as a wedding photographer, I agree with the Church’s point of view. A religious wedding is a celebration but is also a sacred occasion. Secular wedding ceremonies are also important events. No matter how it is conducted or by whom, the ceremony is by far the most significant aspect of the day. However much the happy couple pays, the photographer should allow the ceremony to progress without disturbing it, the participants, or the congregation.

So, perhaps we wedding photographers are bottom feeders. Or are we?

Are Landscape Photographers Worse?

I recently bought a fantastic landscape photography book by a well-known photographer I have a lot of respect for. In it, he exhibits photos taken early in the morning at a particularly beautiful stretch of coastline that I am very familiar with. Where he has set up his camera before dawn is probably the best place to get a photo of that scene. However, it’s also the best roosting spot for a raft of endangered shorebirds that overwinter and feed there.

Migratory birds need to spend all their energies feeding to regain the body mass lost during their flight to their overwintering grounds. Every disturbance reduces the survival of the birds. Those birds, or any wildlife, are an important integral part of the landscape, just as surely as lions, giraffes, and elephants are to the savannah, and polar bears are to the Arctic.

Perhaps Wildlife Photographers Do More Harm Than Good

Landscape photographers probably disrupt the creatures through ignorance. However, creatures are often deliberately disturbed by wildlife photographers who fantasize about appearing on the next cover of National Geographic no matter the cost to the creature.

Somebody I know has an extremely rare and shy bird breeding on their land. Officially, there is only one known breeding pair in the UK. There is more because nobody is letting on that this bird is there because they know they will be inundated with wildlife photographers who will disturb the birds and disrupt their breeding.

So, maybe some wildlife photographers are the worst.

Yes, But What About the Paparazzi and Fashion Photographers?

I’m not so sure, though. The paparazzi hound people and invade their privacy. This has led to enormous upset, disruption to family life, and that horrific fatal car crash in a Parisian tunnel in 1997.

Yet maybe that pales into insignificance when one compares that to the harm caused by fashion photographers who feed the world with images of skinny models with perfect skin. The damage that does to the self-esteem and mental health of, especially, young women. Fashion photography contributes to increased depression, anxiety, and self-harm; decreased socio-emotional well-being; low self-esteem; as well as negative body image.

Photographers of all genres should remember that the photograph is always less important that the subject and the viewer.

But maybe there is worse happening than that. Social media companies now employ vast numbers of content moderators who are exposed to horrendous images of inhuman acts. As a result, those moderators suffer mental health issues from exposure to the pictures. Moreover, there are insufficient moderators to perform that task. Should those inhuman photographers be solely accountable for those images, or should social media companies share that responsibility?

Until now, in America, internet companies have been exempt from any responsibility for the content their sites show because of Section 230, which was originally part of the Communications Decency Act.

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

Originally put in place to promote freedom of expression and innovation, it led to social media platforms washing their hands of any responsibility for the content they show. So long as they did not edit the information posted on their site, they could not be held responsible.

This led to a raft of social issues, not least harassment, hate speech, inciting violence, misinformation, abuse, promotion of suicide, and self-harm, as well as allowing posts by foreign groups to disrupt the democratic process. The mob storming of the United States Capitol in January 2016 is seen to have been prompted by social media posts.

So, it’s not just the photography that is to blame, but how people use images and other information. Those companies that host images will probably soon be held responsible for the outcomes. Just as there was bipartisan support for introducing it, there’s now bipartisan support for rescinding Section 230 because of the harm caused by uncontrolled social media.

If that happens, this will affect not just the big hosts such as Meta, X, and Google, but smaller image host providers, including sites like Fstoppers and its competitors. The moderation of comments and galleries will become more onerous, and I can see commenting disappearing from many sites.

Election Interference and Faked Photos

2024 will see more elections worldwide than any other year in recent history. Never have there been more opportunities for bad actors with evil intent to use imagery to interfere with the electoral processes by posting on social media. Already, fake photos have appeared that show one presidential candidate in a good light. AI image generation tools make that all the easier.

There was outrage recently because a member of the British Royal Family had enhanced a family snap released for Mothering Sunday here in the UK. Most of us have done it to pictures, so the scandal boiled up by the press seemed disproportionate. How many of your family members have used Instagram filters to improve their looks? On one wedding shoot, I removed a pimple from the face in all the pictures of a bridesmaid. Nobody noticed apart from the bride who thanked me for it. If such an edit is done with good intent, then I believe there is no problem. Sadly, not everyone has the same opinion, and for them, anything goes.

However, except for minor edits such as removing dust spots, reputable news agencies insist that photos are genuine. There have been some notable digressions from this standard and great damage to the reputation of the news agencies that have done so. Nevertheless, most press reporting and photos are held to a high standard. Social media posts are not. Research shows that more than 40% of news on social media is fake and an astonishing 86% of Americans are falling prey to fake news.

In Conclusion

It seems the digital world we photographers walk in is precarious, and we risk having our reputations destroyed because of it. If people cannot tell the difference between a fake photo and a real one, doubt will be cast on the validity of all our images. All we can do is continue shooting genuine images and try to do as little harm as possible.

For Campbell Addy, ‘Photographer’ highlights diversity behind the camera

For Campbell Addy, ‘Photographer’ highlights diversity behind the camera
image

In “Photographer,” Academy and Emmy Award-winning filmmakers E. Chai Vasarhelyi and Jimmy Chin embark on a captivating journey with the world’s most remarkable visual storytellers. These extraordinary photographers team up with leading documentary filmmakers in an international adventure that promises an exhilarating and dynamic experience.

One of those photographers is Campbell Addy, a London-based photographer, filmmaker, and artist raised in South London. In his young career, the photographer has managed to kick open the door in editorial fashion photography that has been closed to many previous Black photographers.

Mother Of Girl With Autism “Disgusted” After Photographer Erases Her Child From Class Photo

Mother Of Girl With Autism “Disgusted” After Photographer Erases Her Child From Class Photo
ADVERTISEMENT

After their children took their class photos at Aboyne Primary School, located approximately 30 miles west of Aberdeen, Scotland, parents were shocked to be offered two variants: one with all the members of the class and one without children with complex needs.

Aberdeenshire Council said the decision was not made by the school, and the link to the photos was immediately removed, the BBC reports.

Highlights

  • A photographer offered parents two class photo options: with and without children with disabilities.
  • A mother expressed disgust over her daughter with autism being “erased” from one of the photos.
  • Four children in total were removed from the class photo, according to the mother.

Natalie Pinnell, the mother of one of the children erased from the alternative photo, publicly denounced the incident in a Facebook post.

“This week, a photography company erased my child from a school class photo. Why? Was she not aesthetically pleasing enough?” the mother wrote on Wednesday (March 27).

Image credits: Natalie Pinnell

Pinnell continued by sharing her reaction to the incident: “To say I am disgusted, devastated and absolutely heartbroken is an understatement. My daughter is AMAZING and BEAUTIFUL! Shame on anyone who believes that the erasure of ANY human being is in any way ok.”

She added: “The school were amazing. They were absolutely appalled.”

Pinnell shared that her eldest daughter was diagnosed with autism in 2017.

According to the World Health Organization, about 1 in 100 children has autism.

The term encompasses a diverse spectrum of conditions related to the development of the brain, which can manifest in some degree of difficulty with social interaction, focus on details, or unusual reactions to sensations.

Natalie Pinnell said her eldest daughter, who was diagnosed with autism in 2017, was erased from the class photo

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Natalie Pinnell

“To say I am disgusted, devastated, and absolutely heartbroken is an understatement,” the mother wrote on Facebook

Image credits: Natalie Pinnell

In the comments of the post, the mother wrote that she hopes that the “awful experience” will shed light on the issue of discrimination against children with developmental disabilities.

She also wrote that three other children were erased from the class photo.

Tempest Photography, one of the biggest school photography firms, informed that it had spoken to the photographer involved and the school and that it’s now investigating the matter.

Aberdeenshire Council reacted to the situation with a public statement, deeming the photographer’s actions “unacceptable” and apologizing to the parents.

Aberdeenshire Council apologized to parents for the “unacceptable” incident

Image credits:  Aboyne Primary

“Why? Was she not aesthetically pleasing enough?” Pinnell asked after her daughter was excluded

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits:  Natalie Pinnell

The Aberdeenshire Council wrote: “We are aware that following Aboyne Primary School’s recent school class photographs, links to purchase the pictures included images with and without complex needs provision pupils.

“Whilst this was not a decision taken by the school, we absolutely appreciate the distress and hurt this has caused some parents and carers, and we are sincerely sorry.

“The issue has been taken up with the photography company directly, as this is totally unacceptable.”

The council added: “Aboyne is an inclusive school, and every single child should be included, engaged, and involved in their learning and school experiences.”

People called out the photographer for discriminating against the children

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Aberdeenshire pupils with complex needs ‘erased’ from school photo

Aberdeenshire pupils with complex needs ‘erased’ from school photo
image

Parents have complained their children were being “erased from history” after a version of their school’s class photos excluded children with additional support needs.

A photographer working for Tempest Photography took separate pictures of the P5 class at Aboyne primary school in Aberdeenshire, with the children with additional needs reportedly removed from one set. Parents were then sent a link with both versions to choose from.

It was reported that a set of twins was split up so that the child who uses a wheelchair was excluded from one version.

Natalie Pinnell, whose daughter Erin was among those excluded from a set of photographs, told the Press and Journal: “I am absolutely heartbroken. Furious. A lot of the other parents have decided not to purchase their school photos in support. That means a lot.

“To give people the option to erase my daughter from history for the sake of optics is frankly inhumane. One of the cruellest things that I’ve ever experienced. Me and the other parents just feel devastated beyond belief.”

Pinnell said the school was not aware of the decision to take two sets of photos and investigated immediately once it was alerted by parents.

A second parent, Lisa Boyd, told the newspaper her daughter Lily – who is a wheelchair user – was removed from an alternative photo, leaving the nine-year-old’s twin sister devastated.

Parents have received an apology from the local council, which said the decision had not been taken by the school, and that the link to the photos has been removed.

The Cornwall-based photography company, which employs local photographers to take school photos across the UK, said it had launched an investigation. It said: “We are currently investigating the situation with the school and have no further comment.”

Aberdeenshire council said: “We are aware that following Aboyne primary school’s recent school class photographs, links to purchase the pictures included images with and without complex needs provision pupils.

“Whilst this was not a decision taken by the school, we absolutely appreciate the distress and hurt this has caused some parents and carers and we are sincerely sorry. The issue has been taken up with the photography company directly as this is totally unacceptable.”

The council added: “Aboyne is an inclusive school and every single child should be included, engaged and involved in their learning and school experiences.”

Scotland’s first minister, Humza Yousaf, said that omitting children who have complex needs from some school photographs was “shameful”.

He told PA Media: “It should never have happened at all. I don’t want to see another single example of that anywhere in Scotland. It’s not acceptable, not right. And I’m pleased the council responsible has apologised.”

Photo firm that offered images without pupils in wheelchairs issues statement

Photo firm that offered images without pupils in wheelchairs issues statement

A photography firm apologised to parents after it offered alternative class photos without children with “complex” needs.

Parents with children in Aboyne Primary School, Aberdeenshire, were stunned when children with additional needs were removed from one set of photos taken by a photographer employed by Cornwall-based Tempest Photography. Parents had been sent a link with two versions of the class photo to choose from.

“Recently, after capturing a class group photograph, one of our photographers took additional images of the class group which omitted some members of the class from the photograph.,” Tempest Photography said. “We deeply regret any upset this has caused and would like to sincerely apologise to the parents and children affected.

Has this happened at your school? Get in touch with us here at webnews@trinitymirror.com

A photo of Erin Pinnell, nine. Tempest Photography apologised over what had happened.
(
Natalie Pinnell)

A photo of Erin, nine, leaning against a wall. Ms Pinnell said she did not want other schools to use Tempest Photography.
(
Natalie Pinnell)

“We are a family-run business and photograph at schools across the UK, and would like to reassure our customers that this is not standard procedure for our company and we are taking this matter very seriously. We are committed to implementing meaningful changes to prevent such an occurrence in the future.”

Mum-of-two Natalie Pinnell was stunned when she learned parents were being given the choice to remove her nine-year-old daughter, Erin, from the class photos. She said the decision had “devastated” the family.

The mum told the Press and Journal it felt like having her child “erased from history and told the paper: “I am absolutely heartbroken. Furious.”

She added: “A lot of the other parents have decided not to purchase their school photos in support. That means a lot. To give people the option to erase my daughter from history for the sake of optics is frankly inhumane. One of the cruellest things that I’ve ever experienced. Me and the other parents just feel devastated beyond belief.”

“You can’t erase them because they’re inconvenient,” the businesswoman told MailOnline. “It’s devastating to have your child be erased from a photo or give parents a choice whether she should or should not be included.

“She is the most beautiful human being. Who could do this? I’m grateful that she’s not aware of it because the damage that would do to her self-esteem would be devastating. But I’m having to tell my other daughter about what’s happening to her sister. I’m not sure I’m going to sleep tonight.”

Ms Pinnell said she would never use the company again and that it undermined the work of the primary school. She also described the incident as “painful” and called on other schools to cut ties with Tempest Photography.

A second parent, Lisa Boyd, also told the newspaper her daughter Lily, a wheelchair user, was removed from an alternative photo, with the nine-year-old’s twin sister devastated.

An Aberdeenshire Council spokesperson told The Mirror: “We are aware that following Aboyne Primary School’s recent school class photographs, links to purchase the pictures included images with and without complex needs provision pupils.

“Whilst this was not a decision taken by the school, we absolutely appreciate the distress and hurt this has caused some parents and carers and we are sincerely sorry. The issue has been taken up with the photography company directly as this is totally unacceptable. Aboyne is an inclusive school and every single child should be included, engaged and involved in their learning and school experiences.”

Photography firm asked girl, five, to remove glasses for school photo

Photography firm asked girl, five, to remove glasses for school photo
  • Has YOUR school been affected? Email stewart.carr@mailonline.co.uk

A photography firm which ‘deleted’ children with disabilities or with special support needs from school photos asked a five-year-old girl with super-strength glasses to remove them because ‘her mummy would like a photo of her looking pretty’, MailOnline can reveal.

Tempest Photography which takes official school pictures across the UK was accused of ‘inhumane’ behaviour this week after it removed three children from group pictures at a Scottish primary school.

Parents were sent internet links giving them the option of ordering pictures with or without classmates who were disabled or have additional support needs, prompting one mother to say she felt like her daughter had been ‘erased from history’.

Now another outraged mother Natalie Wild, 45, has revealed how a photographer from the same company asked her daughter Tilly who has serious eyesight problems to take off her thick glasses for a picture.

Ms Wild, a commercial property developer, said the request made her daughter feel ‘vulnerable and scared’ as she relies on her 17 times magnification glasses, and considers them to be part of her.

Natalie Wild has revealed how a photographer from Tempest Photography asked her daughter Tilly who has serious eyesight problems to take off her thick glasses for a picture

Tilly was reportedly asked to remove her glasses because 'her mummy would like a photo of her looking pretty'

Ms Wild, a commercial property developer, said the request made her daughter feel ‘vulnerable and scared’ as she relies on her 17 times magnification glasses, and considers them to be part of her

Tilly Wild

Tilly Wild

She complained to the company after the incident in September 2022 when Tilly was in Year One at the Immaculate Conception Catholic Primary School in Spinkhill, Derbyshire.

But after she was told that it should not have happened, another photographer from the firm made the same request to her daughter on the company’s return to the school to take annual pictures last September.

In an exclusive interview with MailOnline, Natalie said: ‘I knew it was school photo day because parents had been asked to make sure their children were smart.

‘Tilly came out of school at the end of the day with the print out of her photos and handed me two different lots.

‘I said, ‘Oh, why have you got two photos?’, and she replied that the photographer had taken her glasses off.

‘I thought, ‘Oh right’, and I walked back to the cover teacher who said she didn’t know that the photographer had done that, and she was so sorry.

‘I asked what the reasoning was behind it, and she didn’t know. But Tilly said that the photographer had told her, ‘I would like a picture of you without your big glasses on’.

‘Her glasses are incredibly strong. Often glasses are three or four plus and over six is considered strong, but her’s are 17 plus because she has no lens in her eyes.

‘The photographer told my child ‘mummy would like a photo of her looking pretty’. I was absolutely horrified that they could say that to my five-year-old child, especially when you can see she needs these glasses and vanity doesn’t come into it.

‘I was absolutely furious, and I literally cried because Tilly was just five-years-old and had gone through so much already with her eyesight issues.

‘I just bobbed down and asked her how it made her feel. She said, ‘Mummy, I was so scared. My glasses are like my legs and help me see where I am going and how I walk.’

‘We went home, and I rang Tempest. The lady on the phone tried to play it down and said that she had been asked to take them off because of the glare on the glasses.

‘But I told her that they did not have that problem the previous year when Tilly was in reception and had her photo taken.

‘I just didn’t buy it. I said it wasn’t acceptable in this day and age when we celebrate all differences and disabilities. For them to remove my child’s glasses was just disgusting.

‘She asked to pull up the photos on her system, and when she looked at them, she said, ‘Yes, I completely agree with you. There was no need to take them off because there was no glare on the photo. We’ve taken those off for a vanity reason.’

‘I tried to take it further with them, but I got absolutely nowhere. I got an email from a regional manager who regurgitated the same line. He then had the cheek to say that he knew how I felt because he had a granddaughter who was blind.

Three children at Aboyne Primary School (pictured) in Scotland were removed from images sent via an internet link, giving parents the option to order a photo without them in it

Lisa Boyd's nine-year-old daughter Lily Nicolson (pictured), who has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair, was also omitted from one of the class photos, along with another boy

‘There were other children in Tilly’s class who had less strong glasses, and their parents all told me that they had not been asked to take them off.’

Natalie added: ‘The new school photo day was coming round last year, and I told Tilly to not under any circumstances allow the photographer to take her glasses off.

‘The teacher knew that I was really mad about it because I had tried to get the school to stop using the company and everything.

‘When Tilly came out of school, the photo was lovely and showed her in her glasses. But she said that once again, the photographer had asked her to take them off.

‘She had refused, and the photographer asked her teacher to make her do it, but the teacher replied: ‘Absolutely not’. Thankfully she was very forceful, and told the photographer that they had no right to ask her.’

Natalie said: ‘As a parent of a VI (visually impaired) child, I belong to a lot of different forums to see what changes are happening in the world.

‘I mentioned this incident in a group, and so many people had been through a similar experience with Tempest, being told that glasses had to come off because of the glare.’

Natalie did not complain again to Tempest, but instead took the issue up with Royal National Institute for the Blind.

She said: ‘We were looking at whether it went against the Disability Act, but it was a bit of a grey area.’

Natalie who lives in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, with Tilly, now seven, her brother Colby, 13, and financial planner husband David Wild, 44, was ‘horrified’ to read the story about children being ‘deleted’ from pictures at Aboyne Primary School in Scotland.

Erin's mother Natalie told MailOnline: 'You can't erase them because they're inconvenient. It's just not OK'

She said: ‘When I was complaining to Tempest, I told them that there was no way they would ask a child to get out of a wheelchair to take a better photo, so why should glasses be any different?

‘But reading about this latest incident, you can imagine that they would. We are all equal. Tempest are a huge company and have pretty much cornered the market in school photos. They need to sort this out.’

Natalie said her daughter had suddenly developed eyesight problems at the age of two and a half when she woke up one morning and said: ‘Mummy, mummy, my eyes are not working’.

It was discovered that she had severe cataracts and had to undergo seven operations to remove them, but surgeons also had to take out the lenses of both her eyes to avoid complications.

Natalie added: ‘She has got vision, but she has to use these magnifying glasses for her to be able to see. For someone to remove them, you can quite clearly see they are an aid. They are not there for vanity or to correct a tiny bit of eye difference.

‘She wears them all the time. She is absolutely amazing and is flying away at school because she is very intelligent. She does gymnastics and trampolining in her glasses. They never come off.

‘The first time they put glasses on her, she kept them on for an entire year and even slept with them on every single night because she was so scared that her eyesight was going to go again. It just gets me that someone could have done this to my child.’

Tempest Photography which is based in Cornwall could not be contacted today about Natalie’s claims as its switchboard was unmanned due to it being a Bank Holiday.

In a statement released to the BBC, the company said it ‘regretted any upset’ about alternative school group pictures being offered with or without disabled children or those with additional needs.

The firm said: ‘We are a family run business and photograph at schools across the UK and would like to reassure our customers that this is not standard procedure for our company and we are taking this matter very seriously.

‘We are committed to implementing meaningful changes to prevent such an occurrence in the future. We deeply regret any upset this has caused and would like to sincerely apologise to the parents and children affected.’

Natalie Pinnell, 38, told MailOnline the ‘inhumane’ decision to omit her nine-year-old daughter Erin from her class photo at Aboyne Primary School had ‘devastated’ their family.

She said: ‘You can’t erase them because they’re inconvenient. It’s just not OK. It’s devastating to have your child be erased from a photo or give parents a choice whether she should or should not be included.

‘She is the most beautiful human being. Who could do this? I’m grateful that she’s not aware of it because the damage that would do to her self-esteem would be devastating.

‘But I’m having to tell my other daughter about what’s happening to her sister. I’m not sure I’m going to sleep tonight.’

Natalie, who runs a business management and strategy company in Aboyne, said she had been sent an email from the school with two photo links – one that included her daughter and one that didn’t.

Lisa Boyd’s nine-year-old daughter Lily Nicolson, who has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair, was also omitted from one of the class photos, along with another boy.

She said: ‘This is clear discrimination and shouldn’t happen in a school or anywhere.

‘It is the worst that Lily has been treated in her entire life. The school is so inclusive, Lily is included in everything the school does.

‘Her twin sister, Iona, is in a different class and I only got one photo for that class, but I got two for Lily’s – one without my kid in it. It’s horrendous.’