Editor’s Note: Call to Earth is a CNN editorial series committed to reporting on the environmental challenges facing our planet, together with the solutions. Rolex’s Perpetual Planet initiative has partnered with CNN to drive awareness and education around key sustainability issues and to inspire positive action.

A peckish tiger lunching on a softshell turtle, an ant snacking on honeydew, and a pair of glittery slug moth larva are just a handful of scenes depicted in the winning images from the Nature inFocus Photography Awards 2023.

The prize, based in India, recognizes both local and international photographers capturing critical moments in the natural world.

Nature and wildlife storytelling platform Nature inFocus runs the competition. “Every year, we see images that reveal new facets of our natural world while shining a light on pertinent global conservation issues,” said Rohit Varma, one of the group’s founders, in a press release.

A six-member jury composed of wildlife and environmental specialists across film, photography and business selected the winning photographs for each category from 24,000 images that were submitted by 1,500 photographers, according to Nature inFocus.

The winners were presented with their awards during a ceremony on July 29 in Bangalore.

Among the winning images is a photostory focusing on the devastation facing the intricate mangrove forests of the Godavari River in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Using a drone to capture a birds-eye view of the mangrove destruction, Srikanth Mannepuri highlighted the many risks forests face, including plastic waste, deforestation, and aquaculture – despite being a carbon sink and integral buffer against coastal erosion. Mannepuri, a wildlife conservationist, filmmaker and photographer, earned the “Photographer of the Year – Portfolio” title.

Other winning images include rarer wildlife sightings, such as a pair of agitated mountain goats locking horns in a cinematic rocky landscape. In the “Wildscape & Animals in Their Habitat” category, photographer Amit Eshel traveled to Israel’s Zin Desert to capture the two male Nubian ibexes in a heated face-off during rutting season.

According to the IUCN, the Nubian ibex is a vulnerable species – facing threats from agriculture to extreme weather.

In the “Conservation Focus” category, Jo-Anne McArthur was recognized for a haunting image depicting the scorched remains of a eucalyptus plantation following Australia’s bushfires in 2020. McArthur photographed a veterinarian searching for survivors whilst surrounded by charred trees.

Varma takes pride in the Award’s global scope.

“We are thrilled to see the growth in the number of participants and the geographical locations. It truly has become an international platform for wildlife photographers.”

It takes a lot of hard work to become a professional photographer. There are untold hours of toil to perfect the craft and lots of money spent to reach a pro level. So when you get there, how much should you be paid for a day’s work?

This is the issue raised by Roxy Facer this week who called out Vogue Polska for paying her $300 for a full day’s shoot and edit — a fee she deemed to be low.

Even for established professionals, photography can be a difficult career in which to make a living. There are few jobs and freelancing can be very insecure.

Facer, who is primarily a videographer specializing in 8mm and 16mm film, may well feel entitled to mock the $300 fee, as a job like that surely should be closer to $1,000. However, many photographers wouldn’t think twice about accepting that rate.

Sure, it’s not great, but it’s not exactly terrible either. Anyone working in editorial knows that rates have been tumbling for years. Inflation has been rising and prices are going up, but photographers are getting paid less.

This is in part due to the shifting landscape of media. Magazines and newspapers have more readers than ever before but the majority of those come in digital form and publications simply don’t receive anything like the money per reader they used to get in print.

The owners and board members of these huge companies avoid bearing the brunt of these seismic changes. Instead, the cuts are passed down onto the men and women who work tirelessly to put these publications together, e.g. photographers.

Perhaps Facer is not used to the relatively low fees offered to editorial photographers and is more accustomed to commercial fees.

Is $300 Enough Money for a Day Shoot?

I would wager that most editorial photographers would accept $300 as a day rate. As mentioned, it is definitely on the lower end, but it is not catastrophic. If, and that’s a big if, a photographer was paid that every weekday of the year, that is a respectable $78,000 salary before taxes. Depending on where you live in the country, and how big your overhead is (photographers do tend to have larger than normal overhead), it’s a livable wage.

But the fact is photographers don’t get hired every day. And even if they do, there is no guarantee of timely payment or even payment at all — just look at how long some have been waiting to get paid from Outdoor Photographer magazine.

It’s the big companies that are usually worse at this. Smaller companies tend to pay promptly but many, myself included, have had horrific experiences chasing major media companies for payments that should have come weeks, months, and even years ago.

Why Call Them Out?

Many have questioned whether what Facer did is a wise move for her future prospects, but she has nearly 40,000 TikTok followers and this particular episode has propelled her even further up the social media/influencer ladder.

Good for her.

There is no handbook on how to make it as a photographer, every creative takes a different path. Success comes in all forms and you have to take what comes your way.

Rather than burning her bridges, Facer may have opened up new career pathways by exposing the industry’s low rates — something that most photographers wouldn’t dare do for fear of losing clients.

This story is part of PetaPixel’s weekly newsletter Clipped Highlights.

What is Clipped Highlights?

Clipped Highlights is a free, curated, weekly newsletter that will be sent out every Wednesday morning and will focus on a few of the most important stories of the previous week and explain why they deserve your attention. This newsletter is different from our daily news brief in that it provides unique insights that can only be found in Clipped Highlights.

In addition to unique takes on the biggest stories in photography, art, and technology, Clipped Highlights will also serve to feature at least one photo series or art project that we think is worth your time to check out. So often in the technology and imaging space we focus on the how and not the what. We think that it’s just as important, if not more so, to look at the art created by photographers around the world as it is to celebrate the new technologies that makes that artwork possible.

If this kind of content sounds like something you’re interested in, we encourage you to subscribe to the free Clipped Highlights newsletter today. You can read this week’s edition right here, no subscription necessary, to make sure it’s something you want in your inbox.

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:17px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; width: 100%;} /* Add your own Mailchimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block. We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

We’ll also make sure to share each edition of Clipped Highlights here on PetaPixel so if you aren’t a fan of email, you won’t be forced to miss out on the weekly newsletter.

Image credits: Header photo licensed via Depositphotos.