A photographer has filed a personal injury lawsuit after being seriously injured in a devastating helicopter crash to a wedding day photoshoot — which effectively ended her career.

Award-winning photographer Rachel Jordan, who specializes in remote photo shoots, was flying to a special location in a helicopter for a photoshoot with a newly-married couple moments after they exchanged vows on their wedding day on June 12, 2021.

Jordan and the newly-weds, Mahdi Zougub and Fay Elhanafy, were destined for a picturesque mountain spot in Canterbury, New Zealand to take pictures, with guests remaining behind ahead of the reception.

However, shortly after taking off, the Robinson Helicopter Company aircraft’s engine reportedly shut off in mid-air. Jordan and the bride passed out as the helicopter entered a rapid descent from a low altitude.

The aircraft plummeted and crashed onto a fairway at the Terrace Downs Golf Resort in rural Canterbury at 15:03.

All four people on board survived the crash but three, including Jordan and the newlyweds, were seriously injured and rushed by rescue helicopter to Christchurch Hospital.

The photographer was “left immobilized” and recovering in hospital for months after the crash. According to a Givealittle page set up for the photographer, Jordan suffered spinal fractures as well as five fractured ribs, lung laceration, a fractured sternum, a fractured arm, and fractured feet.

A Crash That Ended Her Career

According to EIN News, Jordan and the newly-weds have now filed a personal injury lawsuit against Robinson Helicopter Company and several aircraft parts manufacturers for the devastating crash.

According to a complaint filed on June 8, Jordan suffered serious and permanent physical and psychological injuries as a result of the crash.

The injuries suffered from the crash have essentially put an end to Jordan’s successful career as a top professional wedding photographer in Northland New Zealand. Jordan and her husband’s company, Two Little Starfish, had become a household name in the New Zealand wedding industry

Government crash data from the National Transportation Safety Board allegedly shows that Robinson helicopters have been involved in more than 1,650 incidents and accidents since 1983. Of those, 411 were fatal.

“Unfortunately, protecting profit margins is often more important to manufacturers than protecting the people that fly their aircraft,” Timothy A. Loranger, who represents Jordan and the newlyweds in this case, says.

“Robinson helicopters must do more to identify and resolve safety issues that all too often injure or take the lives of pilots and passengers.”

‘I Love Taking Photos’

Jordan previously said that she would have loved to photograph the couple’s anniversary/second wedding day and complete the photoshoot that never was.

“That is a completion for me. Getting to come back and photograph their day and do their photos in the mountains. That is like going full circle and completing what we started out to do,” Jordan tells RNZ in an interview in September 2021.

“I love taking photos and where there’s a will there’s a way like even if I’m in a wheelchair for many, many months to come I’ll still do photography.

“You know it’s not going to stop me doing what I love doing, but yeah, my goals are just to continue doing what I do.”

Image credits: All photos by Givealittle.

1 / 1
Canmore’s Ashton Thomson races in the women’s CAT 4 race at the Rundle Mountain Road Festival in Canmore on Saturday (June 3). JUNGMIN HAM RMO PHOTO

PiktID is a new software powered by artificial intelligence (AI) that allows photographers to replace people in their photos with synthetic faces, which the developer says offers numerous benefits to commercial and advertising photographers.

PiktID’s developers explain that its software can “keep people” and “remove identities.” The software’s three key features are face replacement, identity generation, and face editing.

The face replacement and identity generation features can protect people’s privacy and help photographers create new non-existing faces. PiktID says that replacing the faces of real people in photos allows images to be used commercially without a model release or worrying about the privacy of individuals, which can be especially useful for photographers taking street photographs or pictures in busy areas. This is also important when contending with privacy laws in specific areas.

PiktID promises to maintain and preserve the aesthetics and overall look of photos with people while generating new faces. This is important when working with photos of children, either for educational institutions or marketing campaigns. While companies and schools want photos of children for public relations and advertisements, there are potential issues concerning the privacy of children. PiktID can change the look of a child, so that the original model is unrecognizable.

Identity generation and face editing features offer further benefits, per PiktID, including the ability for users to tailor AI-generated faces to specific demands, including certain facial expressions, ethnicity, or age.

Going beyond creating a new non-existent face for commercial viability and complying with data protection, PiktID hopes to achieve commercial success by enabling companies to use AI to generate more diverse images of people and target advertising for specific groups of people.

It’s been shown repeatedly that people in different countries and within diverse cultures have varying beauty standards. Some photographers have fought against prevailing ideas of beauty, which can sometimes be quite damaging to people.

Nonetheless, companies want to sell more products, and an effective way to do that is to make marketing materials that appeal to wider groups of people, which can include changing people’s apparent ethnicity. PiktID says that it allows users to “customize models and fit them to any market” and “retarget advertising photos for specific groups.”

Speaking directly to photographers, PiktID also says it can help photographers develop an expanded portfolio by allowing images of a small group of models to appear more diverse and interesting.

For photographers and designers alike, the software’s AI model enables faster face retouching, allowing users to easily adjust facial expressions.

Pricing and Availability

PiktID includes a couple of purchasing options for users. People can pay on a subscription basis and buy different numbers of credits, where each credit allows for one face generation. Subscription plans start at €19 per month, which equals €0.63 per credit for 40 credits. More expensive plans can reduce the per-credit cost down to €0.39 per credit.

A one-time payment “pay as you go” option allows users to purchase bundles of credits for higher costs per credit.

A free trial allows users to test the software with 10 credits, although the face generation in the free trial is described as “low quality.”

A detailed breakdown of subscription and purchasing options is available on PiktID’s website.

Image credits: PiktID

As we all know, there are many things that can make or break a photograph. While technical aspects might immediately jump to mind and the light may grab our attention, one word that tends to pop up a lot in my feedback is “intent”.

There are countless rules in photography, all of which can either be followed, bent, or even broken to various degrees. To me, the difference between an image that “works” and one that “doesn’t work”, is how clearly the intent behind each decision is conveyed by the photographer through their image.

In my opinion, just about any location, any subject, and any style has the potential to work, so long as the image has been executed with a clear intent. Now, I know, I’ve said the word “intent” about 300 times without explaining what I mean, so allow me to break it down a little more below.

Shooting With Intent

For me, this is one of the most notable differences between an experienced photographer and an inexperienced one. If you talk to experienced photographers, I’m almost certain most of them will tell you they rarely press the shutter without a general idea of what the final image is going to look like. When I’m out with my camera, I always have the same mentality. I can’t recall the last time I pressed the shutter without some idea of what I intended the final image to look like.

For example, if I’m shooting an image with a black-and-white conversion in mind, I’ll consider the contrast within the scene and try to use it in the most effective way. Rather than shooting an image and just converting it later, I visualize the scene in black and white as I’m shooting it. However, that isn’t to say I’m married to my original vision til death do us part. Sometimes my final image turns out completely different, because of an adjustment I made in the editing software that suddenly helps me see the scene in a different way or discover an entirely new photograph.

Regardless, having an idea of what you want your final image to look like can both increase the odds of getting a keeper and reduce the number of purposeless photos you have to filter through. So, why is shooting with intent so important? Well, a few reasons, which means it’s time for a list within a list.

It helps you frame the image appropriately: One of the biggest mistakes I used to make in my earlier years was not considering the crop I was going to use for the final image. This meant that I would often shoot the image with no breathing room, which often resulted in awkward cropping challenges, especially when adjusting the lines. Now, I always shoot a little bit wider than I need, which gives me more freedom to make any minor changes I might come across along the creative process. This also comes in handy, when adjusting the lines and leveling the image. Often, if you shoot too tight, adjusting the angles/lines or leveling the image can result in a loss of some elements, or it can throw off the composition/framing. Shooting wider ensures you can make these adjustments and still end up with the image you envisioned.

It helps you use the elements within your frame appropriately: One of the most common mistakes I see from new photographers are images that have multiple elements that don’t seem to have any kind of cohesion within the frame. It’s not uncommon for me to pop online and quickly stumble upon a single image that looks like 3 separate images stitched together, as the elements within the frame have no connection to one another. Taking a moment to visualize the scene as a finished image can help you break it down into its components and realize what is or is not adding to the image as a whole. Furthermore, actively thinking about each element as a cohesive unit and how they interact with each other will help you seek out things to use as leading lines and foreground elements while shooting in the field.

It helps you clean up the frame: Another frequent mistake I see is photographers not putting themselves in the right position to get a clean frame. I can’t count the number of times my feedback has included something to the effect of “If you had taken one step to the left/right…” Scenes can be overwhelming, but it’s important to avoid needless distractions which could have been easily removed by taking a single step in any direction. The easiest way to avoid this is to take a picture and check it on your back screen. This means checking the details within the image, such as the edges of the frame. I always recommend using your back screen, because the human eye tends to overlook these small elements in real time. On the other hand, if you shoot the scene with the knowledge that you will clone something out in Photoshop, you can shoot the image with that element already erased in your mind. Sometimes it’s impossible to get an angle without branches or poles popping into the frame, so understanding that you intend to remove them in post is an advantage of visualizing the scene as a finished image.

It helps you consider the light: As the saying goes ‘photography is light’. Every so often I see an interesting scene, that lacks the necessary light to make it pop. Sometimes, the light is there, but the photographer didn’t consider the contrast, which results in blown highlights. Understanding what you want your image to look like will help you consider things like exposure blending. Additionally, if you are going for a specific look, such as a high-key image, you may want to overexpose specific parts of the image. This will allow you to ensure you have the exact setting you need for each and every image. Knowing what your final image is going to look like before you shoot is not only imperative to creating unique images but it can save you a lot of time fixing up mistakes in post.

It helps you consider the settings: It’s not uncommon for me to ask a newer photographer about the decision process behind their settings choices, only to be told that there wasn’t any. From slightly blurry subjects to questionable depth of field choices, I’ve seen just about every mistake one can make when not shooting with a clear intent. It’s one thing to understand things like shutter speed, aperture, and ISO, but it’s a whole other thing to understand how to use them to achieve different effects. Whether you want your scene to be sharp or blurry to convey motion; your scene overexposed or underexposed; or you want your background in focus or a bokeh, achieving your desired effect requires a combination of understanding your settings and when to use them. Shooting with a clear intent will help you choose those settings, so you can get those effects in-camera rather than trying to fake them in post.

It helps you with the editing process: At one point or another, just about every photographer has uttered those five infamous words: “I’ll save it in post”. While editing software and cameras have come a long way, if you shoot with a clear intent, you don’t have to go around saving images in post, rather you can spend more time enhancing them in post. I can count the number of photos in my portfolio that were ‘saved in post’ on one hand, even if that hand has no fingers, because that number is zero. Every photograph in my portfolio was shot and edited with a clear intent. When you shoot with intent, it increases your odds of getting a photo that has no technical flaws. This will help ensure that you use your editing software to bring your photos to their full potential, rather than a first-aid kit.

It’s required for advanced editing techniques: It won’t, I hope, come as a shock that no photograph requiring advanced editing techniques has happened by accident. For anyone looking to take their photography to the next level by using advanced editing techniques, it’s imperative that you know which techniques you’re planning to use before pressing the shutter. Whether you’re creating panoramic images, blending exposures, or focus stacking, you need to know you intend to use those techniques so that you can take the photos required for the editing process. The first step to using advanced editing techniques is shooting with intent.

Editing With Intent

The second part of photography, which I already mentioned above, is post-processing. Without a doubt, the biggest issue I see with people learning to edit is a lack of intent behind their choices. There’s no bigger offender of this than what I consider to be my least-liked editing choice: the teal sky. I don’t know who started this trend, but I don’t think we can be friends.

I’m not going to be hyperbolic and say “This is the death of good editing”, but it does often ruin an image for me, regardless of the other elements. That’s not to say I hate all images with teal skies, but much like a “Dutch Angle”, there’s a time and place for everything. However, the teal sky isn’t the only offender of the shoot now, worry about the edits later style (looking at you “Cyberpunk Tokyo”).

While teal skies and cyberpunk cities could be considered trend-chasing edits, sometimes longstanding editing choices fall victim to this same issue. I often see images converted to black and white, for no other reason than it’s what people do to make it look artistic. When it comes to editing an image for black and white, it usually helps if the picture was originally shot with that edit in mind. All of this is to say, when you make edits to your photograph, you should be doing so with some clear idea of why you’re making each particular edit. So, what do I mean by editing with intent, and how can it help?

It helps you express or emphasize a feeling/atmosphere within your image: I just finished talking about how I dislike teal skies, but the full truth is that I only really dislike teal skies that are purposelessly added to landscape or cityscape images. If the effect is used to enhance the atmosphere of an image, for example a dystopian theme or a surreal image, then there is a chance I’ll actually like it. However, slapping a teal sky on your image of some mountains and a lake doesn’t make it surreal, it makes it some mountains and lake with a teal sky. I often use my editing software to enhance the color the scene provided to me since RAW images tend to lose a bit of the punch. This means, for example, I make editing choices to enhance the elements that come with a sunset, such as adding a touch of orange/yellow to help the viewer feel the warmth of the setting sun. That’s not to say all of your edits are required to look realistic — go as wild as you like — but be sure that each choice leads towards the image you intend to make.

It can help you guide the viewer: I typically do this by using local adjustments to make points of interest brighter or to add depth to an image. If you have an idea of where you want the viewer to be looking, then you can use your tools to assist them. All too often, I see an image and my first thought is “What am I supposed to be looking at?” or “What’s the focus?” While a lot of this begins with shooting the image with intent, a well-shot image can be enhanced when accompanied by a complementary edit.

It can help you make more deliberate editing choices: When we first dive into editing our images, it can be overwhelming. As such, many newer photographers resort to using pre-sets. I was no different. When I first started editing my photos, I’d simply clicked on the ‘pre-sets’ tab of Lightroom and it let take the wheel. After eventually moving on from essentially outsourcing my editing process to Lightroom, I moved into the next logical step: slapping vignettes on every single one of my photos for no discernible reason. Needless to say, a lot of my early work was unpalatable. However, now that I shoot and edit in a more deliberate way, each and every one of my choices is made with a clear intent. Deliberate editing choices can make all the difference between images that stand the test of time and ones that don’t.

It enhances the image: I know this one is about as simple as they come, but when you edit an image with a clear intent, it’s the easiest way to bring a RAW image to its full potential. As I mentioned above, when you both shoot and edit an image with intent, you can use the powerful tools at your disposal to enhance your images. Whether you’re using global editing tools, local editing tools, or advanced editing techniques, the editing process is one that should be spent creating the images you envisioned, rather than attempting to take them off life-support.

The Wrap-Up

While shooting and editing with intent is important, it’s not a magic wand. There’s no way to guarantee that every image you envision, shoot, and edit will turn out exactly as you imagined it, or even all that good. However, if you do everything with a clear intent, the chances of ending up with portfolio-grade or wall-worthy photographs are much greater.

To help newer photographers, here are a few questions you could ask yourself when shooting and editing.

Questions to Ask Yourself While Shooting

What is the focus of this image? Ask yourself what you intend your viewer to look at and use that to help you with the composition.

Why am I shooting this image? Ask yourself what about the scene interests you and what you consider photo-worthy about the scene.

What settings work best for this scene? Ask yourself if the scene would look better with a short exposure or a long one; a shallow depth of field or a wider one.

How do the elements within my frame enhance the focus or scene? Ask yourself if all the elements work together to form a cohesive image.

How do I intend to edit this photo? Are you planning to convert it to black and white? Do you need to exposure blend?

What crop am I going with for this shot? Consider how wide you need to shoot the image and what it will look like with your intended crop and adjustments

Does this location benefit from a vertical or horizontal shot? If all else fails, take both.

Do the conditions work? Consider if the scene would look better with different weather or at a different time of day.

Are there any distractions? Check the image on your back screen before you pack up.

Questions to Ask Yourself While Editing

What sort of look am I going for? Do you want to create a true-to-life image or a stylized one?

Why am I making these editing choices? Ask yourself why you’re making certain edits to the image (ex: I need to raise the shadows to show more of the detail)

How do these edits enhance the image? Ask yourself if the stylistic choices you’ve made enhance the image (ex: if you reduced the saturation in the image, why do you feel that was the best choice?)

How can I guide the viewer’s eyes with local edits? Ask where you can increase or reduce things like exposure or color to draw the eye of the viewer to particular areas of the image.

Does the crop I envisioned actually work? See if there are alternative crops that might better suit the scene now that you’re in the editing software.

Of course, there are a lot more questions you could ask, but start with these and you’ll start to think more critically about how and what you shoot. Just remember that shooting with intent and editing intent go hand-in-hand to enhance your images in perfect harmony, much like pineapple on a pepperoni pizza – and that is a hill I’m willing to die on.

About the author: Jordan McChesney is a landscape, cityscape, and abstract Canadian photographer living in Chigasaki, Japan. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. You can find more of McChesney’s work on his website, Facebook, and Instagram.

A photographer has told the extraordinary story of how a single photograph he took exposed a CIA coverup in Nicaragua — proving the Reagan administration was illegally supplying rebels.

Lou Dematteis sat down with Vice to recall how his photo of Eugene Hasenfus, a United States Marine, led to a huge controversy for President Reagan known as the Iran-Contra scandal.

Hasenfus was onboard a cargo plane flying into Nicaragua with supplies for the Contra rebels — an illegal act under U.S. law and international law.

However, the supply plane was shot down by the revolutionary government in charge of Nicaragua known as the Sandinistas. The U.S. Marine jumped from the aircraft with a parachute.

“He wasn’t supposed to have a parachute because this was a covert operation run by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). If there was a mess-up they didn’t want anybody alive to talk about it,” Dematteis tells Vice.

The photographer, who had been covering the Nicaraguan revolution since 1985, received a phone call to say there was an American in the jungle so he jumped on a helicopter and arrived at the scene.

Dematteis saw Hasenfus being led away by the Sandanista who had shot the plane down with a shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile and got a photo of him that would be published across the world.

“He looked really worried. He was worried they were just going to kill him,” he says.

“That photo ran all around the world, it ran everywhere. In fact, the head of Reuters Photos in Washington asked me ‘Why I was the only one who had that photograph.’ And I said: ‘I don’t know why, but I know that I got it and if other photographers didn’t get it that’s unbeknownst to me’.”

The Reagan administration denied any knowledge of Hasenfus, despite overwhelming evidence found on the plane. The Miami Herald would win a Pulitzer prize for linking Hasenfus to the Iran-Contra scandal.

“We were able to show that, contrary to what the Regan administration had been saying, the United States was involved illegally in supplying and supporting the Contra rebels,” Dematteis tells Vice.

“I think it’s an example of what photography and what reporting can do and I think that is one of the jobs that journalists have and I’m very proud that I played a part in that.”

Crowd-funded projects mix excitement – because they can represent genuine innovation – and frustration – because things take a long time to make it from idea to reality. They don’t usually present the chance to get you shot, but this one, by Stockcam, definitely does!

• You could consider a stabilizer with camera controls like the Ronin RS3 Mini.

The offering is available for early birds at Indegogo, but Stockcam has also created a page to look for early enthusiasts for the gun-shaped camera cage.

OK, we can see some conceivable advantages to the design when it comes to holding the camera steady with the shoulder rest, and there are places for fill lights or microphones to easily be attached. There are mounts for a couple of lenses in the adjustable shoulder rest, There is even a tripod mount. 

It might even actually make a lot of sense. After all, guns are designed to be steady when aiming. Guns, though, tend to be associated with another purpose, and here is where we run into a problem. One heavily exaggerated by the Stockcam campaign images which don’t exactly steer away from the soldier look!

Size-wise, the ‘gun’ is 500mm long, a similar length to the legendary AK-47 popular with terrorists (at least in 80s movies), rather than the longer but more accurate M4 that US soldiers use today, which is about twice as long again.

That makes sense – here the ‘scope’ (or camera) is the key component, and the butt provides the stabilizing element resting on the photographer’s body. The thing is, through the eyes of a nervous law enforcer, will that be obvious? Or will it cause panic in public places? It looks very gun-like, and a slightly chunky-looking scope isn’t dissuade a nervous officer (and people get nervous when you wave a ‘gun’ around).

In the US alone, law enforcers shot and killed 1,097 people in 2022 – a trend that is steadily rising. That’s just the police. What about worried folk trying to protect their property? We live in a time of heightened concern and there are plenty of armed citizens in some countries, including the US.

Holding this in your hands is essentially handing someone an excuse to walk away from a 2nd-degree murder (manslaughter) inquiry with no punishment. In 2014 at 12-year-old boy, Tamir Rice, was shot by a police officer because he had a toy gun. There were other aspects, but in the inquiry it was noted that the toy didn’t have an ‘orange tip’ that would make it easy for the police officer to see that it was a toy.

Guess what, nor does the Stockcam. In fact, it is needlessly gun-like. Instead of a safety switch, it has a similar switch to choose focus modes. The shutter is, of course, connected to a trigger. And it is called “Fun and engaging” by its designers. That just feels a bit wrong.

So it’s a tool, being marketed a bit like a toy, that might get you shot. Still, I bet it feels somehow more powerful and important to hold it than a traditional rig!

By all means, give it some thought, or be proud to be a photographer and choose something from our best camera rigs guide.