With a small show of prints by Indigenous artists, the MFA looks to the future

With a small show of prints by Indigenous artists, the MFA looks to the future

In 1987, the artist James Luna lay prone and motionless in a display case at the San Diego Museum of Man for hours at a time, dressed only in a loincloth. Luna, who was Puyukitchum, Ipai, and Mexican, used absurdist humor in his work as a blunt instrument; if institutions like the Museum of Man insisted on portraying Indigenous culture as dusty and lifeless, he would indulge them with some contemporary reality. Nearby, not far from the museum’s standard vitrines full of historical Indigenous objects like clothing and pottery, Luna had included some of his own – his Motown record collection, for example, and his divorce papers. Luna, who died in 2018, called the performance “The Artifact Piece,” and it quickly became an icon of Indigenous contemporary art – a good-humored statement that Native American culture was alive and well, despite the “culture-under-glass” ethos at most museums that cast it as a relic.

Luna’s work is featured in “Marking Resilience,” an exhibition of Indigenous prints at the Museum of Fine Arts. The show broadly engages contemporary Native American art’s agenda to portray a culture both ancient and living, and the timing couldn’t be better. Last week, new federal regulations prompted museums all over the country to remove objects from their historical Native American displays unless they’d received consent from the Indigenous nations they relate to. At the MFA, eight objects are being taken off view from the historical Native American gallery right next door to “Marking Resilience” while the museum confirms permission with the nations involved.

Consent, it hardly needs be said, hasn’t factored significantly in the display of Indigenous culture in American museums over centuries. In “Marking Resilience,” Luna takes that notion of cultural appropriation to an absurdist extreme. Eight prints from his 2011 “Sumo Jazz” series form a grid of irreverently pointed mischief. In them, Luna positioned a photo of himself between two Sumo wrestlers in an archival photograph, and then made each print unique with bright, gestural abstract patterning.

Installation view of “Marking Resilience: Indigenous North American Prints” exhibition at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Luna, clutching feathers and swathed in fabric from the waist down, glares theatrically, an accidental tourist in someone else’s culture. By inserting himself where he doesn’t belong, Luna was saying something, I think, about taking without asking – something Indigenous people have known about all too well for generations. The work is inviting, and then uncomfortable; if its cavalier treatment of stereotype makes you leery, that’s the point.

Organized by the MFA’s curator of Indigenous Art, Marina Tyquiengco, “Marking Resilience” is notable for a couple of reasons. It’s the first exhbition that Tyquiengco, who is CHamoru, has curated since her appointment in 2021. Also noteworthy: the MFA acquired almost all the work in the show, which occupies one small gallery, in the last few years. However small scale, the show signals a new commitment by a museum whose engagement with Native American culture has historically been spotty.

In 2018, the MFA exhibition “Collecting Stories: Native American Art” seemed to indicate a reset as the museum aired out its various shortcomings and missteps in the field over generations. Tyquiengco’s 2021 hiring gave it tangible form, and changes through the museum’s displays are an outward signal to viewers of a slowly shifting priority. Native American pieces now routinely appear alongside art of all eras, whether colonial, Modern, or contemporary. Slowly, parallel histories have begun to converge here, telling a richer, more complex story of the nation’s culture.

But “Marking Resilience” has the distinction of being a stand-alone, able to create its own world. Rich gray and crimson walls in low light make a cocoon-like environment, sombre and still, a refuge. Prints have a particular history with Indigenous culture of the post-colonial period, and I was glad to see two pieces by Inuit artists from Nunavut, Canada.

“Crafting a Consequential Narrative,” Duane Slick (Meskwaki (Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi Tribe of Iowa)/Ho‑Chunk Nation, born in 1961) 2020 . Lee M. Friedman Fun Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Drawing and printmaking were not part of Inuit culture until government-funded economic development initiatives in the 1950s helped establish studios in Nunavut, and a market for tourist-friendly work in major cities. Now, Kingaiit Studios and Dorset Fine Arts have helped foster the careers of contemporary Inuit art stars like Shuvinai Ashoona, whose drawings have appeared at the Venice Biennale. Ashoona is part of a generation of Inuit artists making frank depictions of northern life and transcending the original intrusion on their culture.

The MFA’s prints – one, by Akesuk Tudlik, modern and abstract-looking, is actually a butchering diagram for a seal; the other, by Niviaksiak, an icy-blue silhouette of a summer tent with the stark outlines of a parent and child within – are both from 1959, the very beginnings of that northern art scene. I would have liked to see their contemporary progeny here, too. Maybe next time.

But some works here are among their relations: Jeffrey Gibson, who is Choctaw-Cherokee and the US representative at the upcoming Venice Biennale, offers “Say a Prayer,” 2021. A geometric pattern holds fast amid an inky wash of dark, fiery color, the piece quivers with a specific anxiety. Gibson, who is both Indigenous and queer, made it in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder, an explosive moment of violent intolerance once again dominating American life.

Nearby, Duane Slick’s “Crafting a Consequential Narrative,” 2020, also a pandemic response, is a hauntingly fractured image of roiling chaos; sinewy, coal-gray gnarls twist into themselves in the shadowy background, while a coyote’s skull floats on a block of crimson red. With the world tumbling down around him, Slick wrestled with a fact that Native Americans know well: history is shaped and owned by those with the power to record it. Now, as ever, culture — its embrace, its making, and its forward motion — is how Indigenous people endure.

MARKING RESILIENCE: INDIGENOUS NORTH AMERICAN PRINTS

Through March 17. Museum of Fine Arts, 425 Huntington Ave. 617-267-9300, www.mfa.org.


Murray Whyte can be reached at murray.whyte@globe.com. Follow him @TheMurrayWhyte.

25 award-winning photos from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year contest show the beauty and fragility of animals in the wild

25 award-winning photos from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year contest show the beauty and fragility of animals in the wild

An annual contest highlighting the best in wildlife photography shared its winning photos on Wednesday.

Wildlife Photographer of the Year is developed and produced by the Natural History Museum, London.

A panel of judges shortlisted 25 images out of 50,000 submissions. Members of the public then voted for the top five photos, with the top-voted image receiving the People’s Choice Award.

The winning photos will be displayed at the Natural History Museum through June 30, 2024.

Advertisement

Here are the best images from this year’s contest, including the top five fan favorites.

The Path to Authentic Photography

The Path to Authentic Photography

Navigating the creative landscape of photography presents unique challenges, especially when it comes to finding and maintaining a personal style and connection to one’s work. For many photographers, the struggle isn’t just about capturing images but creating photographs that resonate deeply on a personal level.

Coming to you from Rick Bebbington, this introspective video discusses the uncomfortable truth of feeling disconnected from the art of photography despite being deeply embedded in the creative process. Bebbington candidly shares his realization of not taking photos that feel authentically his, despite his involvement in photography-related projects. This revelation is not uncommon in the photography (or any creative) community, where the pressures of producing content can sometimes overshadow the personal joy and fulfillment derived from the craft. Bebbington’s admission highlights a crucial aspect of photography— the importance of personal connection and the quest for a distinctive style that makes one’s work recognizably their own.

Bebbington’s approach to overcoming this creative rut involves setting a dedicated schedule to practice photography, exploring different genres, and studying the work of other photographers to find what resonates with him. His plan to separate his photography from his professional projects serves as a reminder that personal growth in art often requires intentional effort and exploration outside of one’s comfort zone and paid work. It underscores the necessity of continuously pushing boundaries, experimenting, and dedicating time to personal projects to foster a deeper connection with one’s art. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Bebbington.

The Camera Equipment Beginners Don’t Need

The Camera Equipment Beginners Don’t Need

A mix of photography equipment laid out on a black table.

There’s no denying that photography is a gear-focused endeavor. We are constantly pitched fancy new equipment with the idea that more gear will make us better photographers. For some photographers and their needs, that’s absolutely true. But for those just starting, some equipment simply isn’t necessary.

As you begin your photography journey, it can be challenging to filter through all the noise and decipher what is “must-have” versus “nice-to-have,” or flat-out unnecessary. Below are some tips on things that you can likely skip as you start learning, saving you money and keeping you focused on the things that matter.

The Most Expensive Camera

Obviously, a camera is the first step in getting started with photography. And while you may be tempted by the latest and greatest cameras on the market, expensive and advanced cameras may be overkill as you are learn the ropes.

When choosing a first camera, it is important to plan ahead and select an option that will give you room to grow, but only within reason. Otherwise, you’ll be paying for features you likely won’t be able to take advantage of for some time.

For example, the most high-resolution images aren’t necessary for many, and increase the barrier to entry. The same goes for the fastest cameras on the market. Photographers must learn to walk before they can run.

Super Telephoto or Ultra-Wide Angle Lenses

Lenses are a critical component of exploring the creative aspects of photography. However, don’t feel like you need to go out and buy a full kit of lenses right off the bat. It’s more important to have a few quality lenses with useful focal lengths and get used to those while learning the basics of exposure and composition.

When I taught introductory photography classes at a university, I encouraged all my students to invest in a 50mm and not worry about anything else for a while. 50mm offers a perspective close to our vision, meaning you don’t need to account for inherent distortion or perspective shifts related to different focal lengths. For those wanting a bit more versatility, a 24-70mm or 24-105mm standard zoom is a fantastic lens to start out with as well.

While ultra-wide and super telephoto lenses are fun and undoubtedly useful for certain situations, they can add a layer of complexity. This is especially true when learning about topics such as depth of field and distortion. These principles will be easier to understand with a normal lens (one with a focal length close to how we see, such as 50mm) and easier to tackle if you stick to one focal length for a while.

A camera sits on a white surface next to two lenses and three lens filters.

Once photographers find their current lens, or lenses, to not allow them to capture the kinds of images they want, it’s time to upgrade. But making the plunge at the start is a surefire way to unnecessarily spend a large chunk of change.

Niche Filters

There is no shortage of lens filters out there. They range from practical to strictly creative. It can be confusing to figure out which of those filters are worth buying and which are just extra.

Neutral density (ND) and polarizing filters have their place and may be worth purchasing even for beginners, depending on what they photograph. ND filters reduce the amount of light coming into the lens, allowing for the use of wide apertures or long exposures, even in bright light. Polarizing filters, like polarized sunglasses, reduce glare, intensify blue skies, and saturate colors, making them useful for photographing water or working in bright, sunny conditions.

ND and polarizing filters are by no means must-haves, so don’t fret if you don’t have the money for them now. But they can be useful in ways that image editing apps struggle to replicate. Beyond those two, however, most filters serve niche purposes that are rarely relevant to beginners. No matter what, the key is to invest in quality filters. The glass that the light passes through significantly impacts image quality, so opting for cheap filters (including ND and polarizing filters) can negatively impact your images.

Cheap Tripod

We get it; photography equipment is expensive, so it is tempting to look for cheap alternatives. Buying used gear is a great way to save money, for example. But there are some things you shouldn’t skimp on, tripods being one. While you by no means need the most expensive tripod, investing in a durable, sturdy tripod from a trusted manufacturer will actually save you money in the long run.

Cheap tripods are typically flimsy, defeating the purpose of a tripod. Instead of getting stable, sharp images, you’ll be left dealing with blur and camera shake. Or, in the worst-case scenario, it could even blow over in some wind, leaving you with a broken camera. Also, cheap tripods tend to break, so you will likely be buying a new one long before you would need to if you spent a bit more the first time around.

A hand holds the pen to an editing tablet while sitting in front a computer.

Editing Tablet

If you watch YouTube videos of photographers, chances are you’ve seen one working on an editing tablet when retouching photos. While these tablets can be useful, editing tools are complicated enough without adding another layer to the mix. Tablets typically have a steep learning curve, making the editing process even more confusing if you aren’t intimately familiar with the editing program and tools.

Instead, as you start your editing journey, focus on the basics of editing, adjusting things like exposure, contrast, white balance, shadows, and highlights. Once you get those things down pat and start diving into more complicated editing processes requiring fine adjustments, a tablet may make sense for you.

Paid Editing Software

Speaking of editing, when you are a beginner photographer, paid editing software may be more than you need. Programs like Photoshop or Lightroom are advanced tools with nearly limitless options, which makes them challenging to learn. There are some highly capable free editing programs to learn on, allowing you to get a feel for the editing process and if it’s something you want to explore before paying for an expensive program.

An external flash sits with a white umbrella attached.

Lighting Equipment

Lighting equipment can be fun and is a way to create dramatic, unique images. However, for beginners, external lights are not necessary because it’s best — and free — to start with natural light. The basics of photography can be complicated enough, and things get a lot more complicated when you add artificial light, especially flash.

So, instead of spending money on constant lights or strobes, get familiar with natural light and how to adjust exposure based on different lighting conditions. You can also modify light with simple and cheap tools (such as reflectors) instead of investing in lights.

As your skills improve and you find ways in which natural light is limiting your creativity, you’ll know it’s time to jump into artificial lighting. Of course, by that point, you’ll be far from a beginner!

Invest In Gear You’ll Actually Use

At the end of the day, what gear you buy depends on your goals and what you shoot. Certain genres are more gear-heavy or gear-specific than others. Likewise, a beginner casual hobbyist will have different needs than someone who aims to pursue photography as a career or side gig. No matter what, give yourself some room to grow and try to avoid getting sucked into the hype of fancy or niche gear that you likely won’t end up using.

More gear doesn’t always mean better photos, and more expensive equipment is not a shortcut to reaching your photography goals.


Image credits: Header photo licensed via Depositphotos.

Kan. photographer accused of stealing photos liable for $32,000

Kan. photographer accused of stealing photos liable for $32,000

WICHITA, KAN. – A Kansas photographer entered into a consent judgment with the Office of the Sedgwick County District Attorney earlier this month.

The District Attorney’s Consumer Protection Division investigated Caitlin Payne of Derby doing business as CP Family Photography, after receiving several consumer complaints.

The District Attorney’s Office alleged Payne violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (”KCPA”) by deceptively advertising photography services using photographs taken by other photographers and failing to disclose to the consumers that the photographs were not her own.

As part of the investigation, the Consumer Protection Division received an additional complaint involving Payne sending a replacement photographer to a wedding while she was allegedly attending another event and failing to disclose the replacement lacked the skills to perform the contracted services.

While Payne denied intentionally violating the KCPA, she accepted a consent judgment to resolve the matter. The agreement calls for Payne to be liable for $30,000.00 in civil penalties, additional investigative expenses, and court costs while on a 48-month probationary period with the Consumer Protection Division. Payne will have to pay over $2,000.00 in restitution to two impacted consumers.

The consent judgment also calls for an injunction from engaging in deceptive or unconscionable acts and cooperation with any future complaints. Payne promised in future offers for photography services not to use photographs of other photographers unless they are clearly and conspicuously disclosed as only a style of photography that she is capable of reproducing.

The District Attorney reminded that “when hiring a professional for a service, you shouldmake sure to get the scope of work and all promises in writing. If you pay for the services in advance or make a deposit, make sure you understand if you are entitled to a refund in the event the professional fails to perform services or you need to cancel. When selecting a professional you should always research the provider, including on available websites such as the Better Business Bureau. If the professional provides references, be sure to verify they are  legitimate and ask for samples of work the professional has previously performed.

Napping Polar Bear image wins top photography prize

Napping Polar Bear image wins top photography prize
image

(CNN) — An image of a napping Polar Bear curled up on an iceberg is the winner of this year’s Wildlife Photographer of the Year People’s Choice Award.

It’s called “Ice Bed.”

British amateur photographer Nima Sarikhani captured the image off Norway’s Svalbard Archipelago.

He said he hopes it inspires hope that there’s still time to reverse climate change.

More than 75,000 people voted in the competition, a record number. It was chosen from a shortlist of 25 images. Those were narrowed down from around 50,000 entries.

In addition to the winner, there are four finalists. All five images will be exhibited at the Natural History Museum in London through June 30.