A new photo collection at the Harold Washington Library is giving a glimpse into what life was like for Latinos in Chicago during the 1990s.

At the time, Japanese photographer Akito Tsuda was a student at Columbia College when a class assignment brought him to the Pilsen neighborhood.

After graduating, he left the United States — taking those photos with him.

But years later he took a chance and reconnected with his subjects. Now he’s back in the city revisiting the people and places he visited all those years ago.

The library acquired 118 of Tsuda’s photographs, which will be on display in the ninth-floor exhibit hall through the end of the year.

Click here for more information about the “Akito Tsuda: Pilsen Days” exhibit and future events.

It’s easy to imagine the text prompt Miles Astray entered into an image-generating AI tool to get his wild photo of a flamingo looking like a headless ball of pink fluff on spindly legs. The photo just won two awards in the AI category of an international photo competition.

Plot twist: Artificial intelligence had nothing to do with Astray’s photo. He shot it with a camera. And that’s why it got disqualified from the 1839 Awards after winning third place and people’s choice honors for AI photography.

The contest, named for one of the most formative years in the history of photography, includes a range of categories: animals, architecture, landscapes, people, photojournalism, still life. Photographers from 55 countries entered this year’s 1839 Awards. Astray submitted his flamingo photo in the AI group to prove that human-generated art hasn’t lost its impact in a world of algorithms.

“After seeing recent instances of AI-generated imagery outshining actual photos in competitions, it occurred to me that I could twist this story inside down and upside out the way only a human could and would, by submitting a real photo into an AI competition,” Astray explains on his website. He saw the shot, titled “Flamingone,” as the perfect candidate for the job “because it’s a surreal and almost unimaginable shot, and yet completely natural. It is the first real photo to win an AI award.”

Judges from The New York Times, Getty Images, Maddox Gallery and the Centre Pompidou in Paris are among those who picked this year’s winners. Right after Astray found out he won on Tuesday, he notified contest organizers that he’d actually shot his “AI” image of a bird scratching its belly with a Nikon D750 DSLR camera, using Lightroom to convert it from its RAW format to JPG and making a few minimal adjustments.

“I don’t process my images much and usually only to correct whatever the camera didn’t capture authentically,” Astray said in an email. “I like to show the world as is.”

1839 Awards co-founder and director Lily Fierman said the organization fully appreciates the message Astray conveyed by submitting a real photo to the AI category. “We agree that it is an important, relevant and timely statement,” Fierman said in an email. “However, after much internal debate, we decided to disqualify his entry into the AI category in consideration of the other artists who submitted their work.”

Astray calls the decision to disqualify him from the competition “completely justified and right,” and added that the organization’s support for his intended message surprised and heartened him.

The photographer, who’s currently based in La Paz, Bolivia, considers himself a creative nomad. He’s worked for nonprofits in Colombia and Argentina and photographed local communities in Latin America, Asia and Africa. He took “Flamingone” in Aruba in 2022, getting up at 5 a.m. to beat the crowds to a beach known as a site of free-roaming flamingoes.

If Miles Astray seems too perfect of a name for someone who travels the world, it is. In an email, the photographer acknowledged that he uses a nom de plume (nom de camera?) and that he prefers not to reveal his real name publicly.

Astray said he had ethical concerns about misleading the jury, and he didn’t take them lightly.

“But I was hoping that these industry professionals and also the audience would find that this jab at AI and its ethical implications outweighs the ethical implications of deceiving the viewer, which, of course, is ironic because that is what AI does,” he said. “I hope that winning over both the jury and the public with this picture was not just a win for me but for many creatives out there.”

Below, you can see the (truly) AI-generated image that won top prize in the category this year.