Photography

Sex positivity after 70: Marilyn Minter’s sensual photographs of couples in their golden years

Sex positivity after 70: Marilyn Minter’s sensual photographs of couples in their golden years

Written by Jacqui Palumbo, CNN

What does intimacy look like for seniors? There’s no end to sex scenes and other steamy content featuring the young and unwrinkled, but past a certain age, popular culture largely draws a blank — or treats sex as a punchline.

Last year, the artist Marilyn Minter set out to change that, gathering a group of men and women aged 70 and older in her New York studio to showcase a lesser-seen side of sex and relationships. In erotic and colorful images, the seniors are stripped down to lingerie or briefs; they hug, kiss and caress each other in the heat of the moment. The photographs beckon our attention to challenge something still seen as taboo, showing playful, loving moments of pleasure.

“There’s so much contempt for elder sex. Even one of the models that I worked with said, ‘Who wants to see all these?'” Minter recalled in a video call with CNN.

“My whole thought process going into it was that we’re pioneers,” she continued of the unabashedly sexualized context. “Nobody’s ever shot elder people affectionately, and with any kind of elegance. And that was my goal — to make to make them look very desirable.”

“Elder Sex” is Marilyn Minter’s full set of images originally shot for a New York Times Magazine story on senior sex and intimacy. Credit: Courtesy Marilyn Minter & LGDR

A handful of the ensuing images were originally published in the New York Times Magazine, accompanying a candid editorial feature about seniors’ sex lives. Minter is now publishing the series in full in the forthcoming book “Elder Sex,” and exhibiting them at New York gallery LGDR. The exhibition, which opened in April, is her first solo show in the city since the Brooklyn Museum mounted her retrospective “Pretty/Dirty” in 2016, and features highlights from her five-decade-long career, as well as other new bodies of work.

Seeking partners

In “Elder Sex,” Minter utilized one of her signature aesthetics, which she has explored in both hyperrealistic paintings and photographs: jewel-toned, close-cropped compositions of glistening bodies, seemingly shown through the glass of a steamed-up mirror or window. But despite her credentials as one of the most important and boundary-breaking artists today — and despite stars such as Lady Gaga and Lizzo posing for her — Minter couldn’t find enough real couples willing to participate.

The images “give permission to people who feel shame about their sexual urges,” Minter said. Credit: Marilyn Minter/Courtesy of JBE Books & LGDR

“We wanted to (include) all races, all types of sex,” Minter explained. “We had a lot of trouble getting models. I’m 74. I asked all my friends — in mixed-race relationships, in lesbian relationships — and none of them would do it.”

In the end, Minter cast actors along with the few people who had agreed. She paired them together in her studio, photographing them behind a panel of frozen glass — a trick to achieve the steamy, wet look without battling the ephemerality of water vapor. During their shoots, Minter said all her models, who were as old as 89 years old, told her they still had regular, enjoyable sex lives. Their sentiments matched the people interviewed for the New York Times Magazine article, who described deepening intimacy with their partners later in life, as well as learning to navigate and appreciate their needs as their bodies aged.

Seniors do have regular sex lives, but it's rarely discussed. Minter says all her models told her they still enjoy intimacy.

Seniors do have regular sex lives, but it’s rarely discussed. Minter says all her models told her they still enjoy intimacy. Credit: Marilyn Minter/Courtesy of JBE Books & LGDR

Minter believes there’s a sense of freedom in sex later in life that, for many people, can take time to reach.

“When you’re young and having sex, it’s a little more performative than it is when you’re 80,” she said. As an older person, “You’re thinking, ‘This is me. Take it or leave it. I’m just going to enjoy myself. I’m not going to fake anything here.'”

Changing attitudes

Minter acknowledges that sex and self-image is fraught for women of all ages — older women are rarely seen or taken seriously as having intimate needs, while for younger women, sexual agency is often a tightrope walk — too much of it and you can be “excoriated and slut-shamed,” Minter said.

“When you’re 25, there’s just so much fear about young women owning sexual agency — it’s just terrifying to people,” she said.

Related: Watch a previous interview with Marilyn Minter on her ‘steamy’ shower images

But the artist sees some progress in who gets to be seen as desirable on our television screens, reflecting a burgeoning broader shift in cultural attitudes around sex. She pointed to photographs in People magazine comparing the characters of “The Golden Girls” and “Sex and the City,” who are the same age at the time of the latter’s reboot on HBO Max (which is owned by CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery). “The 50s look a lot different in the 2020s!” a caption exclaimed.

Though “The Golden Girls” also delved into romance and intimacy — and was widely-viewed as remarkably sex-positive for its time — there’s a stark contrast in how women in their 50s are presented across the two shows.

“I thought, ‘Okay, here’s why it’s different,” she said. “Number one: People live a lot longer, and they’re healthier… Number two: there’s this thing called Viagra.” Minter laughed, adding: “But who retired at 54? To a home in Florida with three other ladies? What?”

Minter hopes “Elder Sex” will serve as a radical body of work and will help normalize sex at older ages. Credit: Marilyn Minter/Courtesy of JBE Books & LGDR

She hopes “Elder Sex” will not only serve as a much-needed visual reference for what intimacy can look like at older ages, but will also resonate for people who feel like their desires — and lives — are overlooked.

“It gives permission to people who feel shame about their sexual urges,” she said. “I want this to give them permission to explore that and erase the shame.”

Elder Sex,” published by JBE Books, is available now.

Sony World Photography Award 2023 winner turns down top prize after admitting his image was created with AI

Sony World Photography Award 2023 winner turns down top prize after admitting his image was created with AI

The winner of a major photography award has turned down the prize after admitting the image he submitted was created by artificial intelligence.

German artist Boris Eldagsen’s entry, entitled Pseudomnesia: The Electrician, was awarded a Sony World Photography Award last week in the creative open category.

In a statement on his website, the artist said he applied to the competition as a “cheeky monkey, to find out, if the competitions are prepared for AI images to enter”.

“They are not,” he concluded.

He also asked readers: “How many of you knew or suspected that it was AI generated? Something about this doesn’t feel right, does it?

“AI images and photography should not compete with each other in an award like this. They are different entities. AI is not photography.

“Therefore I will not accept the award.”

More on Artificial Intelligence

Eldagsen said he made the organisers aware of how his image was created when they told him he won, claiming they replied telling him he could keep the award.

He has published a detailed account of the conversations he had with award organisers Creo, where he appears to repeatedly push them on why they initially failed to reveal his image had been made using AI.

Advertisement

Eldagsen also pointed out that the phrase “pseudomnesia” means “fake memories” in Latin.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player


2:22

Can you tell which tiger is real?

Read more:
AI generated newsreader debuts in Kuwait
AI can now pick out transplant organs ‘more effectively than what human doctors can see’

AI art generators face backlash from artists – but could they unlock creative potential?

AI has developed rapidly in recent months, with the introduction of the likes of ChatGPT, a language model that can build code or write stories at the click of a button, and software that can drive cars, write university essays or generate images.

A spokesperson for the World Photography Organisation said Eldagsen did make the admission about how his image was made before he was announced as the winner of the contest, adding he emphasised the picture in question “relies on his ‘wealth of photographic knowledge'” and that they were satisfied he had fulfilled the entry criteria.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

However, they also said relations have now soured between two, adding: “Additionally, we were looking forward to engaging in a more in-depth discussion on this topic and welcomed Boris’ wish for dialogue by preparing questions for a dedicated Q&A with him for our website.

“As he has now decided to decline his award we have suspended our activities with him and in keeping with his wishes have removed him from the competition.

“Given his actions and subsequent statement noting his deliberate attempts at misleading us, and therefore invalidating the warranties he provided, we no longer feel we are able to engage in a meaningful and constructive dialogue with him.

“We recognise the importance of this subject and its impact on image-making today. We look forward to further exploring this topic via our various channels and programmes and welcome the conversation around it.”

The 2023 Women Photograph grant cycle is now open! – The Eye of Photography Magazine

The 2023 Women Photograph grant cycle is now open! – The Eye of Photography Magazine
image

L’Agenda de L’Œil de la Photographie est le tout premier agenda global pour la photographie : les actualités du monde entier sont réunies sur une même carte géolocalisée. 5 plateformes vont mettre en avant votre événement : notre site internet (les agendas premium sont présentés sur chaque page), sa web-app, notre newsletter événement envoyée tous les lundis (30K+ abonnés), nos pages Facebook, et Twitter. Réunissant plus de 250 000 visites par mois, L’Œil de la Photographie est la 5e plateforme de la photographie mondiale, et la 1ère en France. Publiez dès maintenant votre événement sur notre plateforme pour le rendre visible à toute notre communauté (nous vous présenterons nos offres après réception de ce formulaire).

Award-winning photograph revealed to be AI-generated image

Award-winning photograph revealed to be AI-generated image

Sony World Photography Award winner Boris Eldagsen from Germany has refused to accept his trophy, revealing his prize-winning photo is an AI-generated image.

The picture, a haunting black and white portrait of two women from different generations, which looks similar to a 1940s family portrait, won the award in the open competition for single images.

During the London award ceremony, Eldagsen revealed the image had been created using artificial intelligence and he refused the prize.

“Thank you for selecting my image and making this a historic moment, as it is the first AI-generated image to win in a prestigious international photography competition,” he says.

“AI images and photography should not compete with each other in an award like this. They are different entities. AI is not photography. Therefore I will not accept the award.”

In a statement on his website, Eldagsen explains how AI technology can be used to “co-create”.

“It is not about pressing a button — and done it is. It is about exploring the complexity of this process, starting with refining text prompts, then developing a complex workflow, and mixing various platforms and techniques.” 

Eldagsen has suggested his competition prize be donated to a photo festival in Odesa, Ukraine. 

Loading Twitter content

Eldagsen said he entered the competition to provoke a debate about artificial intelligence and photography.

“We, the photo world, need an open discussion. A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter — or would this be a mistake?”

Eldagsen has been embracing the new opportunities that artificial intelligence brings, specialising in making AI-generated images, and calling for separate competitions to be created.

His series Pseudomnesia consists of a number of images that look like “fake memories of a past that never existed, that no-one photographed”. 

“Just as photography replaced painting in the reproduction of reality, AI will replace photography. Don’t be afraid of the future. It will just be more obvious that our mind always created the world that makes it suffer,” he says. 

The Sony World Photography Award is yet to issue a statement responding to Eldagsen’s revelation, however it has removed his image from the website and the exhibition in London.

An AI-Generated Photo Was Submitted to a Competition to Make a Point, and It Ended Up Winning

An AI-Generated Photo Was Submitted to a Competition to Make a Point, and It Ended Up Winning

German artist Boris Eldagsen rejected a prestigious photography award, revealing that his submission was AI-generated and he was merely trying to spark debate.

The Sony World Photographer Awards announced its 2023 winners back in March, with Eldagsen among them. The photograph (below), titled Electricia, is described in Sony’s press release as “a haunting black-and-white portrait of two women from different generations, reminiscent of the visual language of 1940s family portraits.”

Image Credit: Eldagsen.com

Image Credit: Eldagsen.com

There’s just one problem: it was made using articial intelligence software. Eldagsen admitted as much in a recent blog post, asking readers, “How many of you knew or suspected that it was AI generated? Something about this doesn’t feel right, does it?”

He went on to say that he would not accept the award nor attend the ceremony, as “AI images and photography should not compete with each other in an award like this.”

“I applied as a cheeky monkey, to find out, if the comeptitions are prepared for AI images to enter. They are not,” he wrote. “We, the photo world, need an open discussion. A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter – or would this be a mistake?”

“With my refusal of the award I hope to speed up this debate,” he concluded.

The image has since been removed from the Sony World Photographer Awards website, and Eldagsen wrote in a follow-up that he “hopes” an official statement form the organization is imminent.

The news comes as controversy continues to swirl around the use of AI software in creative industries, which IGN will be taking a closer look at over the course of its AI Week, starting today. For more, check out how AI became the new battlefield in the animation industry and how a roundtable of how experts think it could affect games.

Alex Stedman is a Senior News Editor with IGN, overseeing entertainment reporting. When she’s not writing or editing, you can find her reading fantasy novels or playing Dungeons & Dragons.

Photographer refuses award after winning top prize with image made by AI

Photographer refuses award after winning top prize with image made by AI

A German photographer has turned down a prestigious prize after revealing that his winning photograph was created using artificial intelligence.

Boris Eldagsen was named the winner in the creative open category at the Sony World Photography Awards, with his black and white photograph Pseudomnesia / The Electrician. The image shows a young woman standing in front of the camera while an older woman stands behind her.

However, one week after he won the prize, Eldagsen shared a statement on his website announcing that he “would not accept the awards”.

“I applied as a cheeky monkey, to find out, if the competitions are prepared for AI images to enter. They are not,” he wrote.

“We, the photo world, need an open discussion. A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter – or would this be a mistake?”

Eldagsen, who specialises in photo and visual art, said that he “hoped to speed up this debate” by refusing the award.

He suggested that “if you dont know what to do with the prize, please donate it to the fotofestival in Odesa, Ukraine”.

A spokesperson for the World Photography Organisation said that Eldagsen told them he had “co-created” the image using AI before he was announced as the winner.

“As per the rules of the competition, the photographers provide the warranties of their entry,” they told The Guardian.

“The creative category of the open competition welcomes various experimental approaches to image making from cyanotypes and rayographs to cutting-edge digital practices. As such, following our correspondence with Boris and the warranties he provided, we felt that his entry fulfilled the criteria for this category, and we were supportive of his participation.”

The WPO added that they had additionally “welcomed Boris’s wish for dialogue”, but had suspended working with him after he declined the award.

“Given his actions and subsequent statement noting his deliberate attempts at misleading us, and therefore invalidating the warranties he provided, we no longer feel we are able to engage in a meaningful and constructive dialogue with him,” they said.

Major Photography Prize Winner Reveals Image Is AI-Generated, Rejects Award

Major Photography Prize Winner Reveals Image Is AI-Generated, Rejects Award

The winner of a major photography prize has rejected the award after revealing that the winning image was generated by AI. 

In March this year, the World Photography Organisation announced the winners of the Sony World Photography Awards 2023. Among many stunning images that took home various prizes was “PSEUDOMNESIA: The Electricia” by German artist Boris Eldagsen, which won in the Creative category. A Sony press release described the image as “a haunting black-and-white portrait of two women from different generations, reminiscent of the visual language of 1940s family portraits.”

However, the image was generated by AI, and not a real photo (something that is obvious when you zoom in and look at the hands in the image, for example). On his personal website, Eldagsen revealed the truth and refused the award. 

“I applied as a cheeky monkey, to find out if the competitions are prepared for AI images to enter. They are not,” he wrote. “We, the photo world, need an open discussion. A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter—or would this be a mistake? With my refusal of the award I hope to speed up this debate.” 

Eldagsen wrote that he has been a photographer for 30 years and recently turned to AI as part of his artistic practice. The winning image is “a complex interplay of prompt engineering, inpainting and outpainting that draws on my wealth of photographic knowledge,” he wrote.

A World Photography Organisation spokesperson told Motherboard that while the judges were aware that AI was used in creating the image, they were under the impression that it was a “co-creation” with AI and that Eldagsen “deliberately” misled them. 

“The Creative category of the Open competition welcomes various experimental approaches to image making from cyanotypes and rayographs to cutting-edge digital practices,” the spokesperson said. “As such, following our correspondence with Boris and the warranties he provided, we felt that his entry fulfilled the criteria for this category, and we were supportive of his participation.” The organization even initially planned to run a Q&A with Eldagsen, but has since “suspended our activities” with the artist, the spokesperson said. The winning image has been removed from the competition’s website “in keeping with his wishes.”

“We recognise the importance of this subject and its impact on image-making today. We look forward to further exploring this topic via our various channels and programmes and welcome the conversation around it,” the spokesperson said. “While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of photographers and artists working in the medium.”

This isn’t the first time that an AI-generated image won an artistic award. Last year, the top prize at the Colorado State Fair’s fine art competition went to an image that was generated using AI, sparking a controversy among artists over whether artificially-generated images should be given accolades over those created by human hands. 

Update: This article was updated with comment from the World Photography Organisation.

Missed Connection

Missed Connection

photo by Victoria Pickering

Ed. Note: If this was you, please email [email protected] so I can put you in touch with OP.

“Dear PoPville,

I was at the “Hands-On Photography” event at THEARC in Southeast on Wednesday, and thought one of the co-participants was really cute!

I took a Polaroid of him and he asked me to sign it, which I thought might have been flirty, but I got distracted trying to return the camera and missed my chance.

If Johnson happens to see this, let me know how the picture came out and if you’d like to go on a photo walk with the blonde girl in glasses!”

Ed. Note: If this is you, please email [email protected] so I can put you in touch with OP. PoPville is not affiliated with either party, please proceed with any potential connection at your own risk using caution as you would any online encounter. For those curious about past missed connections, many have been made and when possible I’ll try to update when/if more are made.

Sony World Photography Award: Winner refuses prize for AI creation

Sony World Photography Award: Winner refuses prize for AI creation

German winner of Sony World Photography Award refuses his prize after revealing his stunning black and white portrait of two women wasn’t all it seems

  • Boris Eldagsen used AI photo to create discussion about future of photography 
  • The German artist admitted he had been a ‘cheeky monkey’ with his entry
  • He explained that he would not accept award because ‘AI is not photography’ 

A German artist who won the Sony World Photography Award has refused to accept his prize after revealing his black and white portrait of two women was in fact created by AI.

Boris Eldagsen tricked competition organisers with his entry, Pseudomnesia: The Electrician – a haunting close-up of two women in a grainy sepia which won the creative open category last week.

He stunned organisers by rejecting the award, claiming that ‘AI is not photography’ – as he hopes to create a discussion surrounding the future of art.

The World Photography Organisation, who run the Sony awards, told MailOnline that they had been deliberately mis-led by Eldagsen about the extent to which AI would be involved.

In a statement on his website, Eldagsen, 52, described this as a ‘historic moment’, adding: ‘I applied as a cheeky monkey, to find out if the competitions are prepared for AI images to enter. They are not.

Boris Eldagsen tricked competition organisers with his entry, Pseudomnesia: The Electrician - a haunting close-up of two women in a grainy sepia which won the creative open category

‘AI images and photography should not compete with each other in an award like this. They are different entities. AI is not photography. Therefore I will not accept the award.’

Eldagsen, who has been a photographer for 30 years before turning to AI, is hoping his snub of the award at Somerset House in London can trigger a debate.

He added: ‘We, the photo world, need an open discussion. A discussion about what we want to consider photography and what not. Is the umbrella of photography large enough to invite AI images to enter – or would this be a mistake?

‘With my refusal of the award I hope to speed up this debate.’

In gate-crashing the prestigious awards ceremony to reject the prize, Eldagsen has reignited a row over the rapid development of AI.

Recent fake photographs of Donald Trump being arrested and the Pope in a puffer jacket have raised concerns over the future of AI. 

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak are among those to have publicly declared their fears over the development of AI.

In an open letter on The Future of Life Institute, Musk and 100 others called for a pause on the ‘dangerous race’ to develop AI, arguing that humankind doesn’t yet know the full scope of the risk involved in advancing the technology. 

They asked all AI labs to stop developing their products for at least six months while more risk assessment is done. 

Musk and others fear that the technology will become so advanced that it will no longer require – or listen to- human interference. 

Eldagsen (pictured), who has been a photographer for 30 years before turning to AI, is hoping his snub of the award at Somerset House in London can trigger a debate

Fake AI image of Trump being arrested

The photo is said to have been created using an AI-generated AI (artificial intelligence) image generator called Midjourney

The World Photography Organisation said they were under the belief that Eldagsen’s entry was a a ‘co-creation’ of his image using AI which ‘fulfilled the criteria for this category’, adding: ‘We were supportive of his participation’.

He noted his interest in ‘the creative possibilities of AI generators’, they added, while ’emphasising the image heavily relies on his wealth of photographic knowledge’. 

A spokesman added: ‘The Creative category of the Open competition welcomes various experimental approaches to image making from cyanotypes and rayographs to cutting-edge digital practices. 

‘As such, following our correspondence with Boris and the warranties he provided, we felt that his entry fulfilled the criteria for this category, and we were supportive of his participation. Additionally, we were looking forward to engaging in a more in-depth discussion on this topic and welcomed Boris’ wish for dialogue by preparing questions for a dedicated Q&A with him for our website.

‘As he has now decided to decline his award we have suspended our activities with him and in keeping with his wishes have removed him from the competition. 

‘Given his actions and subsequent statement noting his deliberate attempts at misleading us, and therefore invalidating the warranties he provided, we no longer feel we are able to engage in a meaningful and constructive dialogue with him.

They continued: ‘We recognise the importance of this subject and its impact on image-making today. We look forward to further exploring this topic via our various channels and programmes and welcome the conversation around it. 

‘While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of photographers and artists working in the medium.’