About

Posts by :

Tap into the world of AI photo editing with Luminar Neo

Tap into the world of AI photo editing with Luminar Neo

The award-winning Luminar Neo Lifetime Bundle is on sale for just $79—just over $11 per program. 

Just a month ago, AI-generated took social media by storm. Users created wide-ranging photos—funny and realistic—using a technology that has recently become more prevalent in photography. According to Wedio, the implementation of AI drastically cuts down on how much time photographers need to edit their prized shots. 

While the technology was enjoyed in a more informal sense by the general public, AI-assistant photo editing has dramatically enhanced the portfolio and catalog of professional photographers. Aspiring and award-winning photographers alike have used technology to enhance their efforts. Now, you can also utilize AI-powered photo editing tools with Luminar Neo, which is bundled with other innovative tools, for only $79 (reg. $400). This is the best price you’ll find online.

Luminar Neo is the star of this bundle. Its easy-to-use friendly interface makes it accessible to everyone. It empowers users’ photography lovers to express the beauty they imagined using innovative AI-driven tools. Powerful editing tools feature many tools, including layers, masking, and local adjustments. AI-powered tools allow users to replace skies and enhance landscapes and portraits. It’s also compatible with Windows, macOS, and can even be used as a plug-in for Photoshop or Lightroom.  

Six photo editing add-ons also come with your purchase, including Perfect Fluffy Clouds, Soulful Panoramas, Spring Adventure, Emerald Forest, Bokeh Dreams, and Champions Bundle. Adjust the clouds in landscape photos to look more fluffy and dynamic, or add a moodier, earthy vibe to your stills. No matter what you want to edit, Luminar Neo and these add-ons can help.

In addition, mobile users can use the Luminar Share Mobile app, which allows them to quickly and seamlessly transfer images from their phone to their computer. Updates to the program are also included for the duration of your product’s lifecycle. 

Luminar Neo was the 2022 Red Dot Winner for Interface Design and boasts a 4.8 out of 5-star rating on Trustpilot. One verified user wrote, “The product is amazing. Its editing capabilities are astonishing and the technical support was thorough and committed.”

Unlock a world of photo editing creativity and capabilities with the help of AI. Grab the award-winning Luminar Neo Lifetime Bundle now for just $79 (reg. $400), the best price on the web.

Prices subject to change. 

This article was made in collaboration with The Jerusalem Post Deals.

AI photography is here to stay—here’s why we should be worried

AI photography is here to stay—here’s why we should be worried

The photographer Boris Eldagsen recently caused surprise and a wave of discussion in the photography field when he won in a category of the Sony World Photography Awards with a synthetic image that he had produced using the AI or generative neural network DALL-E 2.

Eldagsen claims his intent was not to deceive, and he rejected the prize at the awards ceremony because he felt the organisers were not talking about the fact the image was synthetic. His aim, he says, was always to stir debate about the impact of these technologies on the way we think about photography. He also made his position clear, arguing that these synthetic images are not photographs and should not be accepted in competitions for photography. But is it so straightforward?

In a subsequent interview with the BBC, Eldagsen described these images as “promptography” not photography, making the distinction that a true photograph is made from light reacting with a sensitive surface, whereas these photographs are the result of prompts inputted into a neural network. However, this description masks the rather more complex and murky reality of how these neural networks can generate these images at all.

In order to generate such impressively life-like photographs, these neural networks are trained on huge datasets of millions of pre-existing photographs, which allow them to form the necessary “neural” connections to take a textual prompt and turn it into a photorealistic image. In a sense these systems don’t exactly produce anything new at all – they synthesise new images based on the data points of pre-existing photographs.

Through this they “learn” how light and lenses interact to create images in a conventional camera, but they don’t do this themselves, so in a way their outputs are almost closer to collage or 3D-modelling than to conventional photography. The problem here is that these systems struggle to generate images of things they haven’t been trained on, and so this will always be a major limitation to their creativity.

As Eldagsen said in an interview “photographic language has become a free floating entity separated from photography and has now a life of its own”. At the same time, it is also worth noting that computational and generative photography is not exactly new, and we tolerate a wide range of post-processing effects being applied to photographs that bear no direct relationship to light, lenses and the other things we associate with traditional photography. Mobile phones increasingly employ neural networks to improve the images from their cameras, sometimes dramatically altering them in the process and producing an image that would not be possible through optics alone. So a middle ground between traditional photography and synthetic imagery also exists, one of “assisted” photographs that combine the best of both worlds.

Perhaps part of the problem with this debate, however, is that photography is used for a massive array of purposes, and to speak about all of them in the same breath is too ungainly to be useful. There are genres where we might agree that the undisclosed use of these images is problematic, like photojournalism, where the potential for them to be misused is enormous and could have genuinely dangerous consequences.

Synthetic imagery of news events is already circulating widely on social media (such as a recent image of presidents Putin and Xi), and in my own research I’ve found there is huge fear on newspaper desks about the dangers of news organisations using one of these images by mistake. It perhaps matters far less in the context of art, where these generative neural networks are a potentially powerful tool of expression, as Eldagsen himself argues.

But a final question is whether the debate should focus less on whether these images count as photographs, and more about the moral right or wrong of how they work. There is growing evidence that the training data for many of these neural networks draws on copyrighted imagery by existing photographers, and there are a growing number of court cases brought against the companies behind the neural networks. Beyond the rights and wrongs of the images themselves, we should be asking if it is fair that photographers might find themselves losing out financially to systems that are only made possible in the first case because of their photographs.

Lewis Bush is a London-based photographer. He is currently a PhD student at the London School of Economics in the department of Media and Communications and was formerly the course leader of the MA Photojournalism and Documentary Photography course at London College of Communication, University of the Arts London

Why Data-Driven DTC Ad Buyers Need Creative Types (And DTC Twitter) To Get By

Why Data-Driven DTC Ad Buyers Need Creative Types (And DTC Twitter) To Get By

Hey, readers! This is James Hercher, AdExchanger senior editor, here with our weekly Commerce Media newsletter.

Today, we’re getting into the art side of art and science, with a look at Motion, a creative tech and data visualization startup that sits at the awkward intersection of performance marketing and high-strategy creative.

Motion raised $6 million this week and is riding a wave of creative-focused mar tech, such as Memorable AI raising $2.5 million last October and ad tech vet Omar Tawakol launching Rembrand in February.

But Motion has another wave beneath it, and that’s the powerhouse business channel that is “DTC Twitter,” a bubble of ecommerce brand operators and ad buyers, as Motion Co-Founder and CEO Reza Khadjavi told me Tuesday evening, after news of the round.

Why launch creative tech?

Khadjavi and Motion’s other co-founders previously started or were executives at Shoelace, a DTC-focused social media agency. Shoelace began as SaaS tech, but the market wanted a services and agency company for boutique DTC social advertising.

The Shoelace engineering team, a redundant and expensive part for an agency company, spun out in 2021 and turned into Motion. The jumping off point, according to Khadjavi, was when the SaaS product conjoined the metrics and data the performance or growth marketers are using to the actual creative, like the video or image itself.

Performance marketers try to communicate to creative strategists with pivot tables containing columns of slightly different percentages and cells with labels like “UGC_video_ad_BlackFriday_2,” and it simply doesn’t translate. But when two videos are contrasted, the creative execs understand how production and strategy affect performance outcomes.

For example, say two obscurely labeled cells, each representing one video ad, are being compared for their thumb-stop rate (TSR) – an important metric for brands that reach customers on TikTok and other scrolling video feeds. With standard campaign analytics, that might come in a column labeled TSR containing percent rates within a similar bound. And the information goes unabsorbed.

But show creative strategists two side-by-side videos – one that captures people mid-scroll for a second or two but then loses them, another that doesn’t hook people quickly but has a strong completion rate – and creatives see how the content production impacts ecommerce ad metrics and what to do next with those video elements.

“People have this assumption about the creative team that, ‘Oh, they don’t care about data,’” Khadjavi said. In fact, creative agencies and branding departments are hungry for ways to prove the value of their work.

There are also big media-buying changes that make creative a more important lever for the people buying ads. This includes Apple’s ATT and iOS privacy restrictions, which diminish tracking and user-level targeting, and privacy laws and policies that have propelled Google and Meta to launch their own ad products with tighter control over campaigns.

Performance Max and Advantage+, Google’s and Meta’s respective machine-learning ad systems, give advertisers no choice in targeting creative. In fact, neither reports which videos, images and words were used in the campaign.

But advertisers control the content they create and feed into those machine-learning systems.

imageThe DTC Twitter phenomenon

Motion is built in a community of DTC brands, agencies and tech companies that settled on Twitter as a weird breeding ground, like Atlantic seabirds squashed together on a far-flung rock.

“There’s something special about DTC ecommerce and Twitter,” Khadjavi said. Lots of agency buyers, social consultants and brand operators share their information and strategies very openly. People create deal flow by returning value to the community, he said.

Some of the most prominent CMOs and CEOs on DTC Twitter are early Motion customers, too. HexClad pans, Ridge Wallets, Viori pants and Jones Road Beauty makeup are among the brand logos. Performance agencies like Foxwell Digital, Wpromote and Tinuiti license Motion for their own account services as well.

Aside from banding together to support one another’s businesses, DTC Twitter is an investment source. Before this week’s round, Motion previously was backed by angel investors in the space, including Nik Sharma, who owns a branding agency and invests in DTC ad tech and brands themselves; Adam Turner, CEO of Shopify marketing company Postscript; and Ben Jabbawy, who founded and sold the ecommerce marketing company Privy.

“We’re trying to shine a light on this topic of creative strategy,” Khadjavi said, “and build a bit of a community around that.”

‘A History of the World According to Getty Images’ Challenges the Power Structures Inherent in the Capture and Control of Footage

‘A History of the World According to Getty Images’ Challenges the Power Structures Inherent in the Capture and Control of Footage



When a creative material’s copyright lapses, it enters the public domain, which means it is no longer subject to trademarks, patents, or intellectual property rights. No individual, company, author, or artist owns it, and it belongs to the public. If this is the case, why is some public domain footage so expensive? This is the question at the core of Richard Misek’s short film “A History of the World According to Getting Images” in which he explores how historically significant footage from newsreels, government agencies, and pioneers of film are “held captive” behind paywalls.

Beyond the history contained within the images, Misek examines footage itself and what happens after it’s captured. He focuses on Getty Images, the world’s largest commercial archive, challenging its control over public footage, which it only makes available through steep licensing fees. In the case of The Miles Brothers’ iconic short film “A Trip Down Market Street,” which captures downtown San Francisco just days before the devastating 1906 earthquake, the film was digitized in 2016 by the Prelinger Archive and made available for free, while Getty charges hundreds or thousands of dollars for the rights to use the footage, depending on its intended use.

 

Misek parses the unequal power dynamics inherent within capturing life and major events, in addition to the barriers to accessing that footage today. “Newsreel cameras document power, but what strikes me most from my exploration of the Getty Archive, is how much the act of filming itself is an expression of power,” Misek narrates. He points out that footage shot by the government, like the first atomic explosions at Bikini Atoll in 1946, enters the public domain immediately, but that NASA is the only federal agency that releases directly to the public. Misek paid to us use six of the eight full clips in the film, which he sourced from various collections to find the best price.

Whenever I search a news archive, I always hope I’ll find some images that aren’t about power. And once in a while I do. But by and large, the past offers no surprises. As it is the source of all the inequalities and injustices that still exist. That’s why I made this film. Its aim is not only to share images’ stories, it’s to release them from captivity.

By paying to use the full clips, Misek slyly adds previously inaccessible images into the public realm by claiming no copyright, making the film available to stream online and download in full for free. You can find more of his work on Vimeo and his site.

 

A still from a short film by Richard Misek featuring a black-and-white image of a civil rights march.

A clip of two astronauts on the moon. One walks toward the camera and shuts it off.

A still from a historic newsreel of a figure standing with flowers in the road in front of two military tanks.

A historic clip of the Hindenburg zeppelin on fire and crashing to the ground in 1937.

A still from footage of police in riot gear standing in front of protestors. The Getty Images logo is superimposed on top of the image.

Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $5 per month. The article ‘A History of the World According to Getty Images’ Challenges the Power Structures Inherent in the Capture and Control of Footage appeared first on Colossal.

Photographer Captures Jaw-Dropping Mysterious Spiral Over the Aurora with a Simple Explanation–(LOOK)

Photographer Captures Jaw-Dropping Mysterious Spiral Over the Aurora with a Simple Explanation–(LOOK)
credit Todd Slatt with permission – www.aurorahunter.com

For Todd Slatt, a.k.a the “Aurora Hunter” photographing the northern lights is nothing out of the ordinary, but last Saturday, he witnessed something emerging from the darkness of the night sky that shocked and inspired him.

A spiral of pale blue light began to form in the distance, growing ever larger and coming ever closer to the man holding his camera and his breath.

Eventually, it completely passed over his viewing spot in Delta Junction, Alaska, leaving the expert photographer mystified.

“It was a beautiful piece of art in the sky,” Slatt told Anchorage News Daily. “I would say this was maybe the most bizarre thing I’ve ever seen in my life.”

Residents farther north, who are used to wild weather phenomenon, also saw the spiral and wondered what it was.

MORE WILD WEATHER: Hiker Captures Video of Rare Ice Disk Vortex Spinning in Scottish Winter Weather Phenomenon–WATCH

Like many others that night, Slatt did some research and soon appeared on his Facebook with a stunning image of the spiral and a surprising explanation for its origin.

“After doing some online research, this phenomenon appears to be rocket engine exhaust from a SpaceX Transporter-7 mission that launched on the Falcon 9 about three hours earlier in California,” he wrote.

“Water vapor in the exhaust (or jettisoned fuel causing it to spiral?) from the second stage engine freezes and catches high-altitude sunlight, effectively glowing and creating this spiral-galaxy-looking display of light.”

The beauty of the aurora is augmented no end by the blue spiral atop it, and serves to make the sky look somewhat like a national flag.

SHARE This Inspiring And Beautiful Photography With Your Friends… 

Two Mexican Photographers on Vulnerability and Legacy

Two Mexican Photographers on Vulnerability and Legacy

Graciela Iturbide: I became Maya’s mentor through a government grant in the 1990s and, not long after, she traveled with me to France and Hungary as an assistant. We have a similar way of thinking, politically and spiritually, and we live in similar worlds, but our temperaments are very different. Maya has often looked for the toughest thing she can find — the femicides in Juárez; her wonderful projects with sex workers — though she has also photographed healers and shamans. I prefer to shoot in calmer situations. When I get surprised by something, that’s when I pull the trigger.

I don’t feel I’m her teacher, although I suppose she learned about photography from our long conversations and from looking at images together, and we have a shared way of working. I go to live with the people I photograph for a month or two [in order to] establish relationships. It makes the work less intrusive. While Maya was working on “Plaza de la Soledad” (2006), her book about prostitutes in Mexico City, she took me to meet those women. She’d developed such close relationships with them, too.

culture banner

handwritten logo for this issue of T Magazine - reads 'A Woman's Work'

40 legendary female artists —
and the younger women who remind them

why they make art.

READ THE ISSUE

But I don’t know if we have such clear-cut legacies in Mexican photography. When I started out in the 1970s, the great Manuel Álvarez Bravo was the first photographer I knew. As his assistant, I learned how to develop, how to draw out blacks, whites and grays. More than anything, though, in the many years I knew him, he taught me a way of life. He taught me about literature and music and painting, about how to be myself and how to have liberty. My family, who were very conservative, didn’t approve, but now I have nieces who want to be photographers so, in one way or another, I’m passing down the legacy that he left to me, to Maya and others. We all have to go our own way at some point. If we don’t, we never become ourselves.

Maya Goded: For more than 30 years, Graciela and I have had this intense dialogue. I would go over and we would drink a lot of mezcal, look at images, talk about photography, what we were reading, what we were listening to, ideas, politics, the social and cultural life taking place around us. Photography wasn’t just looking at photo books. It was life itself. For a time, Graciela was the only person I always showed my work to, and she’s the only photographer I’ve gone into the field with. She has this powerful but natural way of moving through space, which is something I learned from her: to wait and observe, letting time do its work.

If you’re photographing vulnerable situations, you have to make yourself vulnerable, too. Photography’s a kind of healing, a way to understand your own wounds, which is something Graciela and I have spoken about a lot. Over the years, I’ve seen that she’s always searching. If you have a fixed idea about your work, if you’re not questioning yourself, that means you’re not really living your craft.

Interviews have been edited and condensed.